Responsible Path to Full Obamacare Repeal Act
Sponsored By: Representative Biggs (AZ)
Introduced
Summary
Full repeal of the Affordable Care Act. This bill would repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 and restore the federal statutory framework that existed before those laws.
Show full summary
- Families and patients: Federal health-law rules would revert to the pre‑2010 framework, changing the legal basis for insurance protections and coverage programs that are presently tied to the ACA.
- Federal statutes and programs: All provisions of law amended or repealed by the ACA and HCERA would be restored or revived as if those laws had not been enacted.
- Timing and transition: The repeal would take effect on October 1, 2025. The text does not specify additional transition rules or new funding mechanisms.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
2 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 1 costs, 1 mixed.
Roll back Affordable Care Act coverage and subsidies
If enacted, this would repeal the Affordable Care Act on October 1, 2025. It would restore prior law as if the ACA had never passed. The health insurance marketplace and premium tax credits could end on that date. Medicaid expansion and many consumer protections could also end. Many people could lose coverage or pay more for care.
Student loan and health rules rollback
If enacted, this would repeal the 2010 Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act on October 1, 2025. Rules and programs it changed would go back to pre-2010 law. Student loan rules could shift, changing repayment, lender options, or benefits. Some health law changes tied to the ACA would also revert. Some people could pay more, and others could pay less, depending on which rules applied.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Biggs (AZ)
AZ • R
Cosponsors
Fine
FL • R
Sponsored 10/8/2025
Roy
TX • R
Sponsored 10/28/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HR6225 — PAUSE Act of 2025
This bill would create a nationwide pause on issuing visas and providing immigration status until a set of conditions in the immigration system are met. It would also restrict who can claim birthright citizenship and bar many federal benefits for certain noncitizens. - Families and children: Would restrict birthright citizenship to a child born in the United States only if at least one parent is a U.S. citizen or a lawful permanent resident. It would also allow state and local governments to deny access to public schools for people present without lawful status. - Nonimmigrants and pending applicants: Would prevent nonimmigrants from adjusting to lawful permanent resident status and pause new visas or status grants. It would revoke applications filed before enactment if the new rules make the applicant ineligible and refund any fee paid. - People screened by ideology or affiliation: Would bar lawful status for people described as Islamists or observers of Sharia law, members or associates of the Chinese Communist Party, known or suspected terrorists, or people affiliated with foreign terrorist organizations. - Low-income immigrants and borrowers: Would deny many federal benefits and supports to aliens, including Medicare and Medicaid emergency medical care in certain cases, Supplemental Security Income, SNAP, WIC, premium tax credits, the Earned Income Tax Credit, federal student loans, HUD housing assistance, and Small Business Administration loans or guarantees.
HR22 — SAVE Act
Requires documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in Federal elections. The bill would add verification, recordkeeping, and new penalties while creating a sworn-affidavit and official‑verification path for people who cannot present documents. - Voters without documents: People who lack documentary proof would rely on a standardized sworn affidavit or an official verification process the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) must develop. Provisional ballots could still be cast and counted if citizenship is later verified. - State agencies and DMVs: Motor vehicle agencies and other voter registration points would be required to collect and record citizenship documents and to notify applicants in advance. The Federal mail registration form would be revised and the EAC must issue guidance within 10 days of enactment. - Removal and enforcement: States could use Department of Homeland Security Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (DHS SAVE), the Social Security Administration (SSA) verification service, and state ID data to identify and remove noncitizens. The bill expands private suits and increases criminal penalties for knowingly registering or assisting noncitizens.
HR116 — Stopping Border Surges Act
Tightens asylum eligibility and overhauls rules for unaccompanied children and family detention. The bill would narrow who can get asylum, shorten filing windows, mandate recordings and checklists for credible-fear and expedited-removal interviews, and expand DHS authority over detention and adjudication. - Children and families: Requires specialized interviews for unaccompanied alien children and provides access to counsel at no expense to the Government. It would impose a 14-day hearing timeline for qualifying cases, require certain placement and caretaker contact information be disclosed, and mandate that specified child information be given to DHS within 90 days of enactment. It also narrows Special Immigrant Juvenile Status eligibility and clarifies that non-UAC minors may be detained only to a parent or legal guardian lawfully present. - Asylum applicants and process: Lowers the asylum filing deadline from 1 year to 6 months. It would anchor credible-fear screenings to asylum eligibility rules, require audio or audiovisual recordings and competent interpreters, and change work-authorization timing from 180 days to 1 year with any issued employment authorization expiring 6 months after issuance. It also allows asylum termination if an asylee returns to their home country subject to a waiver for compelling reasons. - Enforcement, fraud, and adjudication: Expands safe-third-country and internal-relocation bars, requires consideration of investigative work product in credibility determinations, and reallocates some asylum adjudicatory authority between DHS and the Attorney General. It adds a criminal penalty of up to 10 years for knowingly fraudulent asylum statements and creates a discovery-based 10-year statute of limitations for certain immigration fraud offenses.
HR925 — Dismantle DEI Act of 2025
Bans many federal Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) practices across the federal government. The bill would define a narrow set of "prohibited DEI practices," require agencies to end DEI offices and related programs, and block similar DEI requirements for contractors, grantees, accrediting bodies, and parts of the military and financial regulators.
HRES888 — Censuring and condemning Delegate Stacey Plaskett and removing her from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence for conduct that reflects discreditably on the House of Representatives for colluding with convicted felony sex offender Jeffrey Epstein during a congressional hearing.
Formal censure and committee removal. This resolution would formally censure Delegate Stacey Plaskett and remove her from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence over allegations she coordinated with Jeffrey Epstein during a February 2019 hearing. - For Delegate Stacey Plaskett: Would issue a formal condemnation and strip her of her seat on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. - For congressional oversight and public trust: Frames alleged real‑time coordination with a convicted sex offender as damaging to the House's reputation and raising questions about her judgment. - For the House Committee on Ethics: Directs a full investigation into the extent of Plaskett's ties to Epstein and any potential improprieties.
HR2705 — Nuclear Family Priority Act
Refocuses family-based immigration to prioritize spouses and children. The bill would narrow who counts as an immediate relative, rewrite family-sponsored categories, change annual visa limits and country allocation rules, and create a limited parent visa. - Families and sponsors: Would redefine "immediate relatives" to include only spouses and children of U.S. citizens or permanent residents and would limit family-preference visas to spouses and children of lawful permanent residents. It also changes age rules so some younger applicants can be adjudicated as children for visa purposes. - Parents of adult U.S. citizens: Would create a new W nonimmigrant visa for parents of U.S. citizens aged 21 or older. Admissions would be up to 5 years, with no work authorization, no eligibility for public benefits, and the U.S. citizen child must arrange health insurance at no cost to the parent. - Visa supply and country caps: Would set the annual family-sponsored level at 88,000 minus a computed adjustment and restructure per-country limits so 75% of family visas are issued without country caps and the remainder are allocated under country ceilings.
Previous / Next Bills
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in