Ensuring Accountability in Agency Rulemaking Act
Sponsored By: Representative Cline
Introduced
Summary
Would require Senate-confirmed presidential appointees to initiate and sign most agency rules under section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act. It also would give the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs new guidance and monitoring duties and establish a narrow public‑safety exemption with required notification.
Show full summary
- Agency leaders and senior political appointees would have to initiate or sign rules, making those tasks nondelegable except in limited cases. This shifts final rulemaking authority to presidentially appointed officials and non‑career senior executives.
- The Administrator of OIRA would issue guidance and monitor agency compliance, while the statute preserves OMB’s other budget and administrative roles. The bill also defines key terms so the requirements target substantive regulations rather than internal agency procedures.
- An agency head could exempt a rule only if complying would impede public safety or security, and must notify OIRA and publish the reasons in the Federal Register consistent with safety and privacy. The bill says these requirements supersede prior practice to the extent of any conflict.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.
Top officials to sign agency rules
If enacted, this bill would require a senior appointee to start any notice-and-comment rule. A Senate-confirmed Presidential appointee would need to sign the final rule. The agency head could make a nondelegable safety or security exception, but must notify the OIRA Administrator and publish the reason in the Federal Register when feasible. OIRA would issue guidance and monitor compliance. It would not change the OMB Director’s budget or administrative powers. It would not cover minor internal rules that do not affect the public. It would take effect upon enactment.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Cline
VA • R
Cosponsors
Golden (ME)
ME • D
Sponsored 1/15/2025
Hageman
WY • R
Sponsored 1/15/2025
Ellzey
TX • R
Sponsored 1/15/2025
Crenshaw
TX • R
Sponsored 1/15/2025
Brecheen
OK • R
Sponsored 1/15/2025
Fitzgerald
WI • R
Sponsored 1/15/2025
Green (TN)
TN • R
Sponsored 1/15/2025
Gill (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 1/21/2025
Webster (FL)
FL • R
Sponsored 2/21/2025
Van Drew
NJ • R
Sponsored 2/21/2025
Steube
FL • R
Sponsored 6/23/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HR38 — Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025
National concealed-carry reciprocity. This bill would create nationwide recognition of state concealed-carry licenses so people with a valid photo ID and a state permit or the right to carry in their home State could carry a concealed handgun in many other States. - Gun owners and travelers: People not federally prohibited from firearms possession who hold a state concealed-carry license or are entitled to carry in their home State could carry a concealed handgun in States that issue permits or do not ban concealed carry. Machine guns and destructive devices are excluded. It would take effect 90 days after enactment. - State and property rights: States would keep the power to prohibit or restrict concealed carry on private property and on State or local government property. The bill also lists federal public lands and agencies where carrying would be allowed in publicly accessible areas, including National Park units and Forest Service land. - Criminal and civil protections: Officers may not arrest absent probable cause that the carry falls outside the law and prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt when the defense is raised. Prevailing defendants can recover reasonable attorney fees and may sue for deprivation of rights with damages.
HR21 — Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
Mandates care and penalties for infants born alive after an abortion. This bill would set standards of care, require reporting, create criminal penalties, and allow civil suits when an infant is born alive following an abortion. - Women and families: A woman on whom an abortion is performed may sue anyone who violates the law and recover objectively verifiable medical and psychological damages, punitive damages, and statutory damages equal to three times the cost of the abortion. Courts must award reasonable attorney's fees to prevailing plaintiffs and may award fees to defendants if a suit is frivolous. - Health care practitioners and facility employees: Any practitioner present at a birth resulting from an abortion must exercise the same professional skill, care, and diligence as for any other live-born infant of the same gestational age. Practitioners or employees who know of a failure to comply must immediately report the violation to appropriate State or Federal law enforcement. - Criminal and statutory consequences: Violators face fines, up to 5 years in prison, or both, and anyone who intentionally kills a born-alive infant is punished under the murder statute. The bill also updates chapter headings and adds statutory definitions for "abortion" and "attempt."
HR925 — Dismantle DEI Act of 2025
Bans many federal Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) practices across the federal government. The bill would define a narrow set of "prohibited DEI practices," require agencies to end DEI offices and related programs, and block similar DEI requirements for contractors, grantees, accrediting bodies, and parts of the military and financial regulators.
HR1422 — Enhanced Iran Sanctions Act of 2025
Targets Iran's energy revenue through global sanctions. This bill would create a broad sanctions framework to punish foreign persons who process, export, or sell Iran-origin oil, condensates, gas, LNG, or petrochemical products. It pairs blocking of assets and visa bans with ownership-based triggers, waivers, humanitarian carve-outs, and new reporting to limit Iran's access to energy markets and finance for weapons and terrorism. - Foreign energy firms and financial institutions would face blocking of property and bans on transactions if they knowingly handle Iran-origin energy or are 50% or more owned by such actors. Associated aliens could become inadmissible and have visas revoked. - Maritime operators, insurers, flag registries, and LNG pipeline facilities would be exposed to sanctions risk when linked to Iran-origin shipments, though safety-of-crew rules and specific exemptions for imports remain. - Humanitarian organizations would keep explicit exemptions for agricultural commodities, food, medicine, medical devices, and humanitarian assistance to avoid disrupting aid. - U.S. agencies and private companies would see new duties: an interagency working group and multilateral contact group would coordinate enforcement, and private-sector reporting would be required to flag evasion and proceeds from intercepted Iran-origin energy sales.
HR1919 — Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act
Bars the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) or any similar digital asset. It would also stop Fed banks from offering accounts or financial products to individuals and prevent using a CBDC to carry out monetary policy, while leaving a narrow exception for an open, permissionless, privacy-preserving dollar-like currency. - Households and individuals: Would block the Fed from holding accounts for people or providing financial products directly, limiting any direct relationship between individuals and Federal Reserve banks. - Federal Reserve and monetary policy: Would ban the Board of Governors from testing, studying, developing, creating, or implementing a CBDC and bar the Fed and the Federal Open Market Committee from using a CBDC to conduct monetary policy. - Banks and intermediaries: Would forbid the Fed from indirectly offering a CBDC through banks or other intermediaries, but exempts a fully private, open, dollar-denominated currency that preserves cash-level privacy.
HR703 — Main Street Tax Certainty Act
This bill would permanently preserve the qualified business income (QBI) deduction by removing the sunset provision in Internal Revenue Code section 199A. The change would apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025, so the deduction would be available for 2026 and later tax years. It achieves this by striking subsection (i) of section 199A and setting that effective date. Taxpayers with qualified business income would continue to claim the QBI deduction under the existing Section 199A rules for those years.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in