HR4245119th CongressWALLET

GLOBE Act of 2025

Sponsored By: Representative Titus

Introduced

Summary

Advance LGBTQI human rights worldwide. This bill would set a U.S. policy and tools package to reduce violence, discrimination, and criminalization of people based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or sex characteristics by creating new diplomatic posts, funding, sanctions tools, and immigration changes.

Show full summary
  • People facing persecution and civil society: Would get targeted grants, emergency assistance, technical support, and capacity building through a new Global Equality Fund and a USAID Global Development Partnership, with a focus on historically excluded groups.
  • Refugees and asylum seekers: Would treat persecution for sexual orientation or gender identity as membership in a particular social group, repeal the asylum filing deadline, expand Priority 2 refugee processing for vulnerable LGBTQI nationals, and expand access to appointed counsel in some proceedings.
  • U.S. government operations and partners: Would create a permanent Special Envoy and a USAID Senior LGBTQI Coordinator, require PEPFAR partners to train on LGBTQI health needs, allow self-selected sex markers on State Department IDs, publish a biannual sanctions list with visa inadmissibility consequences, and require regular reporting and interagency coordination.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

9 provisions identified: 8 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.

Easier asylum and refugee help

This bill would remove the legal filing deadline for asylum, and it would apply to cases filed before, on, or after enactment. It would treat persecution based on sexual orientation or gender identity as a valid basis for asylum. If you are indigent and ask, a court would appoint a lawyer for covered removal cases at government expense. LGBTQI people from countries that fail to protect them could get Priority 2 refugee processing. If a refugee shares SOGI information with U.S. staff, the State Department would share it with a resettlement agency only with the refugee’s consent to avoid unsafe placements.

Simpler IDs and citizenship for families

The State Department would let you choose the sex marker on passports and consular birth records, including a nonbinary “X”. Within 90 days, it would issue rules clarifying that a biological link is not always needed for a child born abroad through assisted reproductive technology to get U.S. citizenship, if the parent is legally recognized at birth. The bill would also treat a qualifying “permanent partnership” like marriage for this Act, with clear age, relationship, and commitment rules.

More reporting and police training abroad

The State Department’s annual human-rights reports would include laws, discrimination, and violence tied to sexual orientation, gender identity, or sex characteristics. Posts would report incidents, drivers, and responses, and regional plans would include strategies, investigations, and victim support. The Department would track how much aid goes to LGBTQI-related programs and share indicators with the OECD on request. U.S.-supported international law-enforcement academies would teach LGBTQI rights and how to document and prosecute hate crimes.

Stronger U.S. leadership on LGBTQI rights

This bill would create a permanent Special Envoy for LGBTQI human rights at the State Department. It would set up an interagency group, led by the Secretary of State, to coordinate urgent responses, long-term policy, and sanctions advice. USAID would add a Senior LGBTQI Coordinator to guide inclusive development work across the agency.

PEPFAR training and reports on equity

The PEPFAR Coordinator would require all partners to get training on LGBTQI health needs and human rights and set up ways to ensure fair access to services. The Coordinator would promptly tell Congress about obstacles and fixes. Within 180 days, the government would send three reports to Congress on: use of U.S.-provided commodities as evidence for arrests, the effects of partner notification and index testing, and how the Mexico City Policy has affected the global LGBTQI community.

Aid partners must serve everyone fairly

U.S. humanitarian, development, and global health funds would not go to partners that exclude people from services, unless a program has a valid focus on higher-risk groups. Recipients would need to make reasonable efforts to ensure subs comply. If they cannot follow these rules, they would agree to return funds and could face penalties. The State Department would brief Congress every quarter on how it monitors compliance.

More support for U.S. diplomats' families

The State Department would give employees and families more information on LGBTQI issues at posts overseas. It would make every effort to ensure U.S.-supported schools abroad have active nondiscrimination policies, and include LGBTQI-focused school info in post reports and bidding materials. The Department would also push host countries to issue visas and accredit LGBTQI family members. It would send Congress a classified list within 180 days naming countries that refused accreditation in the prior two years and actions taken.

New funds and partnerships for equality

The State Department would create a Global Equality Fund, if Congress provides money, to give grants and emergency help to human-rights groups. The Secretary could also accept private and nonprofit contributions to support the fund’s goals. USAID would launch an LGBTQI Global Development Partnership to back leadership, research, inclusive development, and entrepreneurship with help from donors, companies, NGOs, and universities.

Visa bans for foreign LGBTQI abusers

The President would publish a list within 180 days, and every six months after, of foreign persons tied to severe abuses against people due to sexual orientation, gender identity, or sex characteristics. The list could include a classified annex, with 15 days’ notice to Congress. Listed people and their immediate family would be inadmissible and ineligible for U.S. visas or entry. Any current visas would be revoked under existing immigration law. There would be procedures to remove names and to answer congressional requests within 120 days.

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

Titus

NV • D

Cosponsors

  • Cohen

    TN • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Casten

    IL • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Dean (PA)

    PA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Strickland

    WA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Schneider

    IL • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Jacobs

    CA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Omar

    MN • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Moulton

    MA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Gottheimer

    NJ • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Krishnamoorthi

    IL • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Peters

    CA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Davids (KS)

    KS • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Brownley

    CA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Castro (TX)

    TX • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Lieu

    CA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Kennedy (NY)

    NY • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Lynch

    MA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Goldman (NY)

    NY • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Jayapal

    WA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Torres (CA)

    CA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Barragan

    CA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Nadler

    NY • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Meng

    NY • D

    Sponsored 7/16/2025

  • McGovern

    MA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Pocan

    WI • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Ramirez

    IL • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Huffman

    CA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]

    DC • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Garcia (CA)

    CA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Crockett

    TX • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Tlaib

    MI • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Simon

    CA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Williams (GA)

    GA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Johnson (GA)

    GA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Balint

    VT • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Costa

    CA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Mullin

    CA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Keating

    MA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Khanna

    CA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Chu

    CA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • McClellan

    VA • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Moore (WI)

    WI • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Hayes

    CT • D

    Sponsored 6/27/2025

  • Amo

    RI • D

    Sponsored 6/30/2025

  • Bera

    CA • D

    Sponsored 7/16/2025

  • Fletcher

    TX • D

    Sponsored 7/23/2025

  • DeSaulnier

    CA • D

    Sponsored 8/15/2025

  • Quigley

    IL • D

    Sponsored 10/6/2025

  • Johnson (TX)

    TX • D

    Sponsored 7/23/2025

  • Cisneros

    CA • D

    Sponsored 9/3/2025

  • Sherman

    CA • D

    Sponsored 10/24/2025

  • Moskowitz

    FL • D

    Sponsored 11/17/2025

  • Harder (CA)

    CA • D

    Sponsored 11/18/2025

  • McBride

    DE • D

    Sponsored 11/21/2025

  • Horsford

    NV • D

    Sponsored 12/15/2025

  • Houlahan

    PA • D

    Sponsored 12/18/2025

Roll Call Votes

No roll call votes available for this bill.

View on Congress.gov

Related Bills

Back to Legislation

Take It Personal

Get Your Personalized Policy View

Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.

Already have an account? Sign in