GLOBE Act of 2025
Sponsored By: Representative Titus
Introduced
Summary
Advance LGBTQI human rights worldwide. This bill would set a U.S. policy and tools package to reduce violence, discrimination, and criminalization of people based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or sex characteristics by creating new diplomatic posts, funding, sanctions tools, and immigration changes.
Show full summary
- People facing persecution and civil society: Would get targeted grants, emergency assistance, technical support, and capacity building through a new Global Equality Fund and a USAID Global Development Partnership, with a focus on historically excluded groups.
- Refugees and asylum seekers: Would treat persecution for sexual orientation or gender identity as membership in a particular social group, repeal the asylum filing deadline, expand Priority 2 refugee processing for vulnerable LGBTQI nationals, and expand access to appointed counsel in some proceedings.
- U.S. government operations and partners: Would create a permanent Special Envoy and a USAID Senior LGBTQI Coordinator, require PEPFAR partners to train on LGBTQI health needs, allow self-selected sex markers on State Department IDs, publish a biannual sanctions list with visa inadmissibility consequences, and require regular reporting and interagency coordination.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
9 provisions identified: 8 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.
Easier asylum and refugee help
This bill would remove the legal filing deadline for asylum, and it would apply to cases filed before, on, or after enactment. It would treat persecution based on sexual orientation or gender identity as a valid basis for asylum. If you are indigent and ask, a court would appoint a lawyer for covered removal cases at government expense. LGBTQI people from countries that fail to protect them could get Priority 2 refugee processing. If a refugee shares SOGI information with U.S. staff, the State Department would share it with a resettlement agency only with the refugee’s consent to avoid unsafe placements.
Simpler IDs and citizenship for families
The State Department would let you choose the sex marker on passports and consular birth records, including a nonbinary “X”. Within 90 days, it would issue rules clarifying that a biological link is not always needed for a child born abroad through assisted reproductive technology to get U.S. citizenship, if the parent is legally recognized at birth. The bill would also treat a qualifying “permanent partnership” like marriage for this Act, with clear age, relationship, and commitment rules.
More reporting and police training abroad
The State Department’s annual human-rights reports would include laws, discrimination, and violence tied to sexual orientation, gender identity, or sex characteristics. Posts would report incidents, drivers, and responses, and regional plans would include strategies, investigations, and victim support. The Department would track how much aid goes to LGBTQI-related programs and share indicators with the OECD on request. U.S.-supported international law-enforcement academies would teach LGBTQI rights and how to document and prosecute hate crimes.
Stronger U.S. leadership on LGBTQI rights
This bill would create a permanent Special Envoy for LGBTQI human rights at the State Department. It would set up an interagency group, led by the Secretary of State, to coordinate urgent responses, long-term policy, and sanctions advice. USAID would add a Senior LGBTQI Coordinator to guide inclusive development work across the agency.
PEPFAR training and reports on equity
The PEPFAR Coordinator would require all partners to get training on LGBTQI health needs and human rights and set up ways to ensure fair access to services. The Coordinator would promptly tell Congress about obstacles and fixes. Within 180 days, the government would send three reports to Congress on: use of U.S.-provided commodities as evidence for arrests, the effects of partner notification and index testing, and how the Mexico City Policy has affected the global LGBTQI community.
Aid partners must serve everyone fairly
U.S. humanitarian, development, and global health funds would not go to partners that exclude people from services, unless a program has a valid focus on higher-risk groups. Recipients would need to make reasonable efforts to ensure subs comply. If they cannot follow these rules, they would agree to return funds and could face penalties. The State Department would brief Congress every quarter on how it monitors compliance.
More support for U.S. diplomats' families
The State Department would give employees and families more information on LGBTQI issues at posts overseas. It would make every effort to ensure U.S.-supported schools abroad have active nondiscrimination policies, and include LGBTQI-focused school info in post reports and bidding materials. The Department would also push host countries to issue visas and accredit LGBTQI family members. It would send Congress a classified list within 180 days naming countries that refused accreditation in the prior two years and actions taken.
New funds and partnerships for equality
The State Department would create a Global Equality Fund, if Congress provides money, to give grants and emergency help to human-rights groups. The Secretary could also accept private and nonprofit contributions to support the fund’s goals. USAID would launch an LGBTQI Global Development Partnership to back leadership, research, inclusive development, and entrepreneurship with help from donors, companies, NGOs, and universities.
Visa bans for foreign LGBTQI abusers
The President would publish a list within 180 days, and every six months after, of foreign persons tied to severe abuses against people due to sexual orientation, gender identity, or sex characteristics. The list could include a classified annex, with 15 days’ notice to Congress. Listed people and their immediate family would be inadmissible and ineligible for U.S. visas or entry. Any current visas would be revoked under existing immigration law. There would be procedures to remove names and to answer congressional requests within 120 days.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Titus
NV • D
Cosponsors
Cohen
TN • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Casten
IL • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Dean (PA)
PA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Strickland
WA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Schneider
IL • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Jacobs
CA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Omar
MN • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Moulton
MA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Gottheimer
NJ • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Krishnamoorthi
IL • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Peters
CA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Davids (KS)
KS • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Brownley
CA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Castro (TX)
TX • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Lieu
CA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Kennedy (NY)
NY • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Lynch
MA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Goldman (NY)
NY • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Jayapal
WA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Torres (CA)
CA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Barragan
CA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Nadler
NY • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Meng
NY • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
McGovern
MA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Pocan
WI • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Ramirez
IL • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Huffman
CA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]
DC • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Garcia (CA)
CA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Crockett
TX • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Tlaib
MI • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Simon
CA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Williams (GA)
GA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Johnson (GA)
GA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Balint
VT • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Costa
CA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Mullin
CA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Keating
MA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Khanna
CA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Chu
CA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
McClellan
VA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Moore (WI)
WI • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Hayes
CT • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Amo
RI • D
Sponsored 6/30/2025
Bera
CA • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Fletcher
TX • D
Sponsored 7/23/2025
DeSaulnier
CA • D
Sponsored 8/15/2025
Quigley
IL • D
Sponsored 10/6/2025
Johnson (TX)
TX • D
Sponsored 7/23/2025
Cisneros
CA • D
Sponsored 9/3/2025
Sherman
CA • D
Sponsored 10/24/2025
Moskowitz
FL • D
Sponsored 11/17/2025
Harder (CA)
CA • D
Sponsored 11/18/2025
McBride
DE • D
Sponsored 11/21/2025
Horsford
NV • D
Sponsored 12/15/2025
Houlahan
PA • D
Sponsored 12/18/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HR20 — Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2025
Strengthens worker organizing rights and enforcement. The bill broadens who counts as an employee or joint employer and builds tougher remedies, penalties, and election rules to make organizing and bargaining easier to enforce and monitor. - Workers: Expands who is treated as an employee by tightening the three-part test for independent contractors and broadening the joint-employer test to include direct, indirect, and reserved control. It adds clear protections for strike participation and allows back pay without reduction and liquidated damages equal to twice awarded damages. - Employers: Requires prompt disclosure and new notice duties including a detailed voter list within two business days and multilingual employee notices. Noncompliance can trigger civil penalties including up to $50,000 per unfair labor practice, up to $10,000 per refusal to obey Board orders, and fines for posting or voter-list violations. - Elections, agencies, and unions: NLRB must adopt remote electronic voting within one year and aim to hold elections within twenty business days. The bill also boosts NLRB reporting and transparency, expands private suits, and creates new whistleblower protections and expedited enforcement.
HR1589 — American Dream and Promise Act of 2025
New pathways to permanent residence. This bill would create a ten‑year conditional permanent resident status for certain people who entered as children and would add an adjustment pathway for specified Temporary Protected Status and Deferred Enforced Departure holders. - Young long‑term residents and DACA‑eligible people could get a ten‑year conditional status if they meet rules like continuous presence since Jan 1, 2021 and education or credential benchmarks. They could convert to full permanent residence after meeting removal‑of‑condition rules and have limits on removal while applying. - Nationals with qualifying TPS or DED status who meet continuous‑presence rules could apply within a three‑year window and face a capped application fee of $1,140. - The bill creates a competitive grant program to help applicants, allows fee exemptions for youth, low‑income people, foster care alumni, and those with serious disabilities, and adds a $25 supplemental surcharge to fund appointed counsel.
HR15 — Equality Act
Adds sexual orientation and gender identity to the federal definition of sex and creates a uniform, nationwide nondiscrimination framework across employment, housing, credit, education, public accommodations, jury service, and programs that receive federal funds. The bill would harmonize definitions, remedies, and rules of construction across multiple civil rights statutes to make enforcement and claims more consistent. - Workers: Private and federal employees would gain explicit protection from discrimination for sexual orientation and gender identity. The bill would update Title VII rules, expand remedies, and adjust bona fide occupational qualification rules to account for gender identity. - People using public places, students, and tenants: Public accommodations and education laws would explicitly bar discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. The Fair Housing Act would adopt the same definitions and protections to cover renters and buyers. - Borrowers, juries, and enforcement: The Equal Credit Opportunity Act would bar credit discrimination on these bases. Jury selection rules would be updated to prevent discrimination. The bill would also prevent the Religious Freedom Restoration Act from being used to challenge enforcement under the covered civil rights laws.
HR14 — John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025
This bill would restore robust federal oversight of voting rights by rewriting Section 2 and creating a broad practice-based preclearance system. It sets new tests for vote-dilution and vote-denial claims, adds retrogression rules for actions on or after January 1, 2021, and requires extensive public notice, data disclosure, and observer powers. - Minority and language-minority voters: Provides clearer legal paths to challenge districting and practices that dilute or abridge votes, recognizes coalitions of minority groups, and applies retrogression rules to actions from January 1, 2021. - States and local election officials: Triggers preclearance using a 25-year lookback with numeric thresholds and creates an administrative bailout that requires demonstrating sustained compliance over a 10-year period to avoid coverage. - Enforcement, oversight, and courts: Expands who may sue to include private "aggrieved persons", centralizes observer authority in the Attorney General, and authorizes pre-suit inspection and information demands that courts may enforce or modify.
HR12 — Women’s Health Protection Act of 2025
This bill would protect access to abortion before viability nationwide. It would block state rules that single out abortion, safeguard telemedicine and medication abortion, and protect the right to travel for care. - People seeking care and families: Would be able to obtain abortion prior to viability without residency limits, medically unnecessary tests, or required in‑person visits. About 63% of terminations are medication abortions and the bill limits extra drug restrictions beyond generally applicable rules. - Health care providers: Would be able to prescribe, dispense, and provide abortion through hospitals, clinics, pharmacies, and telemedicine without facility, staffing, or credential rules that are stricter than comparable procedures. - People in restricted states and cross‑state travelers: Would have a protected right to travel for abortion and to assist others. By January 2025 abortion is unavailable in 14 states and 17.98 million people of reproductive age lack home‑state access, and travel time to facilities has quadrupled since Dobbs. - States and officials: The Attorney General and private parties could sue to enforce the Act, and courts could grant injunctions, declaratory relief, and award costs and reasonable attorney fees.
HR2763 — American Family Act
This bill creates monthly child tax credit payments that replace the annual Child Tax Credit mechanism and add a separate credit for other dependents. It sets fixed monthly amounts, a monthly advance payment system, rules for presumptive eligibility, and enforcement for improper claims. - Families and parents: Parents get monthly payments of $300 per child age 6 and older, higher monthly rates for younger children, and a $2,400 payment for a child in their birth month. - Other dependents and income: A new $500 nonrefundable credit for other dependents is added and phases out for higher earners, with thresholds that vary up to about $400,000 depending on filing status. - Administration and safeguards: The IRS will deliver monthly advance payments, use presumptive eligibility and a submission portal, require child and taxpayer TINs, permit limited data sharing with other government entities, and can disallow claims for fraud with penalties including a 120-month bar for fraud and a 24-month bar for reckless or intentional disregard.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in