Assault Weapons Ban of 2025
Sponsored By: Senator Adam Schiff
Introduced
Summary
Nationwide ban on semiautomatic assault weapons and large-capacity magazines. This bill would broadly prohibit the import, sale, manufacture, transfer, and interstate possession of defined semiautomatic assault weapons and magazines holding more than 10 rounds while creating marking rules, enforcement tools, exemptions, and buy-back funding.
Show full summary
- Gun owners and households: Would make it unlawful for unlicensed people to transfer grandfathered semiautomatic assault weapons to other unlicensed people unless a licensed importer, manufacturer, or dealer handles the transfer, with required background checks and recordkeeping starting 90 days after enactment. Appendix A lists hundreds of specific models that would be exempted.
- Manufacturers and dealers: Would require new serial-number and marking rules for firearms made after enactment and give the Attorney General authority to set identification standards and maintain a public, annual record of SAWs used in crimes.
- Law enforcement and local governments: Creates exemptions for qualified federal and state officers and authorizes Byrne grant funding for buy-back programs to compensate surrendered semiautomatic assault weapons and large-capacity magazines.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
6 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 2 costs, 1 mixed.
Ban on many assault weapons
If enacted, it would be illegal to import, make, sell, transfer, or possess many semiautomatic assault weapons and magazines in interstate commerce. A large-capacity device is any feed device that holds more than 10 rounds. People who lawfully had covered items on the date of enactment could keep them under the grandfather rule. The bill also lists many narrow exemptions such as certain law enforcement and government uses.
New rules for grandfathered weapons
If enacted, owners of grandfathered semiautomatic assault weapons would face new rules. You could not privately transfer such a gun to another private person unless a licensed dealer first takes custody and runs the required background check. That transfer rule would begin 90 days after enactment. You must lock the gun or carry it if a person prohibited from having firearms could access it. The Attorney General would set a maximum fee dealers may charge for handling transfers.
Stronger penalties and forfeiture rules
If enacted, existing federal criminal penalties and seizure/forfeiture rules would apply to violations involving the newly banned weapons and large-capacity devices. Prosecutors could use current sentencing and asset-forfeiture tools for those offenses. These changes would take effect upon enactment.
Grants for local gun buybacks
If enacted, the federal government could give Byrne grants to states and localities to help pay people who turn in certain semiautomatic assault weapons and large magazines. The bill does not set how much each payment would be. Grants would be available to jurisdictions that run buy-back programs.
List of exempt firearm models
If enacted, the bill would add an Appendix A listing specific firearm models that are not covered by the ban. A firearm is exempt only if it was manufactured on the bill's introduction date. Owners and dealers of listed models could keep or transfer those specific guns under the law.
Public list of guns used in crimes
If enacted, the Attorney General would keep and publish a record of semiautomatic assault weapon makes, models, and manufacture dates when they are used in state or federal crimes. The record must include crime details and investigation outcomes and be sent to Congress each year.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Adam Schiff
CA • D
Cosponsors
Christopher Murphy
CT • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Richard Blumenthal
CT • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Alex Padilla
CA • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Angela Alsobrooks
MD • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Tammy Baldwin
WI • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Michael Bennet
CO • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Lisa Blunt Rochester
DE • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Cory Booker
NJ • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Maria Cantwell
WA • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Christopher Coons
DE • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Tammy Duckworth
IL • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Richard Durbin
IL • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
John Fetterman
PA • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Ruben Gallego
AZ • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Kirsten Gillibrand
NY • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Maggie Hassan
NH • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
John Hickenlooper
CO • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Mazie Hirono
HI • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Timothy Kaine
VA • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Andy Kim
NJ • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Amy Klobuchar
MN • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Sen. Luján, Ben Ray [D-NM]
NM • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Edward Markey
MA • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Jeff Merkley
OR • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Patty Murray
WA • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Gary Peters
MI • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
John Reed
RI • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Jacky Rosen
NV • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Bernie Sanders
VT • I
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Charles Schumer
NY • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Jeanne Shaheen
NH • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Elissa Slotkin
MI • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Tina Smith
MN • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Chris Van Hollen
MD • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Mark Warner
VA • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Raphael Warnock
GA • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Elizabeth Warren
MA • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Peter Welch
VT • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Sheldon Whitehouse
RI • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Ron Wyden
OR • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Jon Ossoff
GA • D
Sponsored 5/5/2025
Brian Schatz
HI • D
Sponsored 7/23/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
S1503 — Equality Act
Treat sexual orientation and gender identity as forms of sex discrimination across federal law. The bill would explicitly add sexual orientation and gender identity to federal sex‑discrimination protections and apply those rules across many statutes and programs.
S2150 — Women’s Health Protection Act of 2025
Guarantee nationwide protections for a person's right to obtain abortion services and a provider's right to deliver them. The Women's Health Protection Act of 2025 would create a federal rule that stops laws and rules that single out abortion or place heavier burdens on abortion than on similar medical procedures. It defines key terms, protects pre-viability care, allows post-viability care to protect life or health, and explicitly protects interstate travel and the movement of medicines, equipment, patients, and providers. - Families and patients: Would protect access to abortion before viability and allow post-viability care when needed to protect life or health. It would bar medically unnecessary in-person visit rules and stop forced disclosure of why a patient seeks care. - Health care providers: Would protect providers' ability to give abortion care including by telemedicine and across state lines, and would forbid facility, staffing, testing, or disclosure requirements that are not required for similar procedures. - States and interstate commerce: Would preempt conflicting state laws and recognize a right to travel and to assist others in getting reproductive health services across state lines. - Courts and enforcement: Would let the Attorney General sue and would create a private right of action so patients and providers can seek injunctive relief and attorney's fees. It would limit state sovereign immunity where federal law allows challenges.
S2523 — John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025
This bill would restore and strengthen federal voting-rights protections by rewriting Section 2, creating a practice-based preclearance process for certain election changes, and boosting transparency and enforcement. - Voters in racial, language-minority, and Tribal communities would gain broader legal standards to challenge discrimination. The bill would add distinct Section 2 tests for vote-dilution, vote-denial, and intentional discrimination and add a retrogression standard that applies to actions taken on or after 2021. - State and local election officials would face new preclearance and public-notice rules. Covered changes like election methods, redistricting shifts, ID rules, polling-place moves, and voter-list removals would need review before implementation and require pre-election notices 30 days before Federal elections with 48-hour updates. - The Department of Justice and private citizens would get stronger tools to enforce rights. The Attorney General would centralize observers, extend bilingual protections to 2037, seek preventive relief, issue pre-action information demands, and pursue expanded court remedies.
S1115 — Paycheck Fairness Act
Stronger enforcement against sex-based wage discrimination. This bill would tighten legal remedies, expand pay-data reporting, and fund training and grants to help close persistent pay gaps between men and women. - Workers: Would expand protections so employees can discuss pay without retaliation and pursue compensatory and, for willful misconduct, punitive damages. It also narrows the employer "bona fide factor" defense so pay differences must be job-related and business-necessary. - Employers: Private firms with 100 or more employees would face new pay-data reporting requirements by sex, race, and ethnicity and public disclosure of aggregated results by industry, occupation, and metro area. - Federal contractors and agencies: The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs would restart and expand contractor pay surveys and must annually select not less than half of nonconstruction contractor establishments to report. The Bureau of Labor Statistics would continue tracking women in its employment survey. - Training, grants, and outreach: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and OFCCP must receive training funded by appropriations. A new competitive Negotiation Skills Training grant program would fund entities to teach pay negotiation and report on outcomes.
S51 — Washington, D.C. Admission Act
This bill would admit the District of Columbia as the State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth, giving its residents full congressional representation. It would also carve out a separate federal 'Capital' around core federal buildings and set a staged transition for courts, services, and federal property. - Residents: District residents would gain two Senators and one Representative immediately upon admission and the current non‑voting Delegate office would be repealed. - Territory and federal limits: A defined Capital area including the Capitol, White House, Supreme Court, and adjacent federal lands would remain under U.S. title or jurisdiction and generally would not be subject to state taxation except where Congress permits. - Courts, justice, and transition supports: The bill would keep federal prosecution support, U.S. Marshals services, pretrial and public defender arrangements, and Bureau of Prisons housing rules during transition; it would provide a temporary Federal Medical Assistance Percentage uplift for five years and establish an 18‑member Statehood Transition Commission to oversee the change.
S3214 — Background Check Expansion Act
Would require background checks for most private firearm transfers by routing them through licensed dealers. This bill would create a new transfer framework that makes it unlawful for two unlicensed people to complete a firearm transfer without a licensed importer, manufacturer, or dealer first taking possession to run the check and comply with federal transfer rules. - Private sellers and buyers would have to route most sales through a licensed importer, manufacturer, or dealer who would take possession to run the background check and follow all transfer requirements. - Licensed importers, manufacturers, and dealers would be required to provide a notice of the prohibition and collect a certification on a form prescribed by the Attorney General before completing a transfer. - Close family and estate transfers would be exempt, including transfers between spouses, domestic partners, parents and children, siblings, aunts or uncles and nieces or nephews, and grandparents and grandchildren, and transfers by operation of law to executors or trustees. - Temporary and specific transfers would be exempt in narrowly defined situations. These include short-term transfers to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm, transfers approved under the tax code, and transfers that occur only at a shooting range or for hunting, trapping, or fishing while the transferor is present and has no reason to believe the transferee is prohibited. - Transfers to law enforcement officers, armed private security professionals acting within official duties, and members of the Armed Forces acting in their official capacity would be exempt. - The bill's amendments would take effect 180 days after enactment.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in