Background Check Expansion Act
Sponsored By: Senator Christopher Murphy
Introduced
Summary
Would require background checks for most private firearm transfers by routing them through licensed dealers. This bill would create a new transfer framework that makes it unlawful for two unlicensed people to complete a firearm transfer without a licensed importer, manufacturer, or dealer first taking possession to run the check and comply with federal transfer rules.
Show full summary
- Private sellers and buyers would have to route most sales through a licensed importer, manufacturer, or dealer who would take possession to run the background check and follow all transfer requirements.
- Licensed importers, manufacturers, and dealers would be required to provide a notice of the prohibition and collect a certification on a form prescribed by the Attorney General before completing a transfer.
- Close family and estate transfers would be exempt, including transfers between spouses, domestic partners, parents and children, siblings, aunts or uncles and nieces or nephews, and grandparents and grandchildren, and transfers by operation of law to executors or trustees.
- Temporary and specific transfers would be exempt in narrowly defined situations. These include short-term transfers to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm, transfers approved under the tax code, and transfers that occur only at a shooting range or for hunting, trapping, or fishing while the transferor is present and has no reason to believe the transferee is prohibited.
- Transfers to law enforcement officers, armed private security professionals acting within official duties, and members of the Armed Forces acting in their official capacity would be exempt.
- The bill's amendments would take effect 180 days after enactment.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
2 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 1 costs, 0 mixed.
New rules for private gun sales
This bill would make most private gun sales illegal unless a licensed dealer, importer, or manufacturer first takes the gun to run a background check. The licensee would have to follow dealer rules, give a written notice, and get the buyer's certification on a form. If the licensee takes the gun and the sale cannot go forward, returning it would not count as a sale. The bill would make breaking this rule a crime. Several exceptions would apply, including certain law enforcement or military transfers, many family loans or gifts, short emergency handovers, transfers at ranges, and hunting uses. These rules would start 180 days after enactment.
No federal gun registry allowed
This bill would say nothing in the Act allows the federal government to create a national gun registry. It would also say states can still make their own laws on the same topic. This rule would take effect upon enactment.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Christopher Murphy
CT • D
Cosponsors
Angela Alsobrooks
MD • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Tammy Baldwin
WI • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Michael Bennet
CO • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Richard Blumenthal
CT • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Lisa Blunt Rochester
DE • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Cory Booker
NJ • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Maria Cantwell
WA • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Christopher Coons
DE • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Catherine Cortez Masto
NV • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Tammy Duckworth
IL • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Richard Durbin
IL • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
John Fetterman
PA • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Ruben Gallego
AZ • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Kirsten Gillibrand
NY • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Maggie Hassan
NH • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Martin Heinrich
NM • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
John Hickenlooper
CO • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Mazie Hirono
HI • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Timothy Kaine
VA • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Mark Kelly
AZ • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Andy Kim
NJ • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Angus King
ME • I
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Amy Klobuchar
MN • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Sen. Luján, Ben Ray [D-NM]
NM • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Edward Markey
MA • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Jeff Merkley
OR • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Patty Murray
WA • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Alex Padilla
CA • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Gary Peters
MI • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
John Reed
RI • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Jacky Rosen
NV • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Bernie Sanders
VT • I
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Brian Schatz
HI • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Adam Schiff
CA • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Charles Schumer
NY • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Jeanne Shaheen
NH • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Elissa Slotkin
MI • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Tina Smith
MN • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Chris Van Hollen
MD • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Mark Warner
VA • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Raphael Warnock
GA • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Elizabeth Warren
MA • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Peter Welch
VT • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Sheldon Whitehouse
RI • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Ron Wyden
OR • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Jon Ossoff
GA • D
Sponsored 1/14/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
S1503 — Equality Act
Treat sexual orientation and gender identity as forms of sex discrimination across federal law. The bill would explicitly add sexual orientation and gender identity to federal sex‑discrimination protections and apply those rules across many statutes and programs.
S2150 — Women’s Health Protection Act of 2025
Guarantee nationwide protections for a person's right to obtain abortion services and a provider's right to deliver them. The Women's Health Protection Act of 2025 would create a federal rule that stops laws and rules that single out abortion or place heavier burdens on abortion than on similar medical procedures. It defines key terms, protects pre-viability care, allows post-viability care to protect life or health, and explicitly protects interstate travel and the movement of medicines, equipment, patients, and providers. - Families and patients: Would protect access to abortion before viability and allow post-viability care when needed to protect life or health. It would bar medically unnecessary in-person visit rules and stop forced disclosure of why a patient seeks care. - Health care providers: Would protect providers' ability to give abortion care including by telemedicine and across state lines, and would forbid facility, staffing, testing, or disclosure requirements that are not required for similar procedures. - States and interstate commerce: Would preempt conflicting state laws and recognize a right to travel and to assist others in getting reproductive health services across state lines. - Courts and enforcement: Would let the Attorney General sue and would create a private right of action so patients and providers can seek injunctive relief and attorney's fees. It would limit state sovereign immunity where federal law allows challenges.
S2523 — John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025
This bill would restore and strengthen federal voting-rights protections by rewriting Section 2, creating a practice-based preclearance process for certain election changes, and boosting transparency and enforcement. - Voters in racial, language-minority, and Tribal communities would gain broader legal standards to challenge discrimination. The bill would add distinct Section 2 tests for vote-dilution, vote-denial, and intentional discrimination and add a retrogression standard that applies to actions taken on or after 2021. - State and local election officials would face new preclearance and public-notice rules. Covered changes like election methods, redistricting shifts, ID rules, polling-place moves, and voter-list removals would need review before implementation and require pre-election notices 30 days before Federal elections with 48-hour updates. - The Department of Justice and private citizens would get stronger tools to enforce rights. The Attorney General would centralize observers, extend bilingual protections to 2037, seek preventive relief, issue pre-action information demands, and pursue expanded court remedies.
S1115 — Paycheck Fairness Act
Stronger enforcement against sex-based wage discrimination. This bill would tighten legal remedies, expand pay-data reporting, and fund training and grants to help close persistent pay gaps between men and women. - Workers: Would expand protections so employees can discuss pay without retaliation and pursue compensatory and, for willful misconduct, punitive damages. It also narrows the employer "bona fide factor" defense so pay differences must be job-related and business-necessary. - Employers: Private firms with 100 or more employees would face new pay-data reporting requirements by sex, race, and ethnicity and public disclosure of aggregated results by industry, occupation, and metro area. - Federal contractors and agencies: The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs would restart and expand contractor pay surveys and must annually select not less than half of nonconstruction contractor establishments to report. The Bureau of Labor Statistics would continue tracking women in its employment survey. - Training, grants, and outreach: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and OFCCP must receive training funded by appropriations. A new competitive Negotiation Skills Training grant program would fund entities to teach pay negotiation and report on outcomes.
S2837 — Protect America’s Workforce Act
Protect federal employees' collective bargaining rights. This bill would nullify Executive Orders 14251 and 14343 that exclude certain workers from federal labor-management programs, bar any federal funds from carrying them out, and preserve collective bargaining agreements in effect on March 26, 2025 through their stated terms. - Federal employees and unions: Keeps contracts that existed on March 26, 2025 in force until their agreed expiration, protecting negotiated pay and working conditions. - Federal agencies: Prevents agencies from obligating or spending federal funds to implement the two Executive Orders, blocking efforts to remove those exclusions.
S2556 — Protecting Health Care and Lowering Costs Act
Permanently expands premium tax credits and removes the 400% cap. This bill would make enhanced premium subsidies permanent with a new sliding scale of required premium shares by income and would repeal Subtitle B of Title VII to restore the prior health-related framework. - Households: Families and individuals above 400% of the federal poverty line could qualify for premium tax credits and would face premium caps up to 8.5% of income. - Health law framework: Repeals Subtitle B of Title VII and directs that any law or regulation referenced there apply as if that subtitle had not been enacted, restoring the earlier health-related rules. - Timing: The changes would apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in