Women’s Health Protection Act of 2025
Sponsored By: Senator Tammy Baldwin
Introduced
Summary
Guarantee nationwide protections for a person's right to obtain abortion services and a provider's right to deliver them. The Women's Health Protection Act of 2025 would create a federal rule that stops laws and rules that single out abortion or place heavier burdens on abortion than on similar medical procedures. It defines key terms, protects pre-viability care, allows post-viability care to protect life or health, and explicitly protects interstate travel and the movement of medicines, equipment, patients, and providers.
Show full summary
- Families and patients: Would protect access to abortion before viability and allow post-viability care when needed to protect life or health. It would bar medically unnecessary in-person visit rules and stop forced disclosure of why a patient seeks care.
- Health care providers: Would protect providers' ability to give abortion care including by telemedicine and across state lines, and would forbid facility, staffing, testing, or disclosure requirements that are not required for similar procedures.
- States and interstate commerce: Would preempt conflicting state laws and recognize a right to travel and to assist others in getting reproductive health services across state lines.
- Courts and enforcement: Would let the Attorney General sue and would create a private right of action so patients and providers can seek injunctive relief and attorney's fees. It would limit state sovereign immunity where federal law allows challenges.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
4 provisions identified: 4 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
Federal protections for abortion care
If enacted, you would be able to get abortion care before fetal viability without state rules that single out abortion. Providers could give abortions after viability when, in their good-faith medical judgment, it is needed to protect the patient's life or health. The bill would bar residency bans, medically unnecessary in-person visit rules, telemedicine limits beyond generally applicable rules, and facility or staffing rules that do not apply to comparable procedures. Tests or procedures could only be required if they are standard in established clinical practice guidelines. These protections would take effect upon enactment.
Federal preemption of conflicting laws
If enacted, the bill would make its protections override any federal or State law that conflicts with it. Federal and State officials would be prohibited from enforcing laws that conflict with the Act. The bill preserves specific exceptions, such as clinic access laws and certain insurance and contract rules. These preemption rules would take effect upon enactment.
Stronger federal enforcement and court tests
This bill would let the Attorney General sue in federal court and let individuals and providers sue States or officials to stop laws that violate the Act. Plaintiffs would not have to exhaust state remedies and courts could enjoin enforcement and award costs and reasonable lawyer fees to winners. The bill also requires courts to demand clear and convincing proof that a challenged restriction is essential to safety or health and cannot be achieved by less-restrictive means. These enforcement and judicial rules would take effect upon enactment.
Right to travel for reproductive care
If enacted, you would be able to travel to another State to get reproductive health services, including abortion. You would also be able to assist another person to travel for such care. These travel and assistance rights would take effect upon enactment.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Tammy Baldwin
WI • D
Cosponsors
Richard Blumenthal
CT • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Charles Schumer
NY • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Patty Murray
WA • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Richard Durbin
IL • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Angela Alsobrooks
MD • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Michael Bennet
CO • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Lisa Blunt Rochester
DE • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Cory Booker
NJ • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Maria Cantwell
WA • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Christopher Coons
DE • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Catherine Cortez Masto
NV • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Tammy Duckworth
IL • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
John Fetterman
PA • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Ruben Gallego
AZ • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Kirsten Gillibrand
NY • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Maggie Hassan
NH • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Martin Heinrich
NM • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
John Hickenlooper
CO • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Mazie Hirono
HI • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Timothy Kaine
VA • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Mark Kelly
AZ • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Andy Kim
NJ • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Angus King
ME • I
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Amy Klobuchar
MN • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Sen. Luján, Ben Ray [D-NM]
NM • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Edward Markey
MA • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Jeff Merkley
OR • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Christopher Murphy
CT • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Jon Ossoff
GA • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Alex Padilla
CA • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Gary Peters
MI • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
John Reed
RI • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Jacky Rosen
NV • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Bernie Sanders
VT • I
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Brian Schatz
HI • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Adam Schiff
CA • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Jeanne Shaheen
NH • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Elissa Slotkin
MI • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Tina Smith
MN • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Chris Van Hollen
MD • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Mark Warner
VA • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Raphael Warnock
GA • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Elizabeth Warren
MA • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Peter Welch
VT • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Sheldon Whitehouse
RI • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Ron Wyden
OR • D
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
S1503 — Equality Act
Treat sexual orientation and gender identity as forms of sex discrimination across federal law. The bill would explicitly add sexual orientation and gender identity to federal sex‑discrimination protections and apply those rules across many statutes and programs.
S2523 — John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025
This bill would restore and strengthen federal voting-rights protections by rewriting Section 2, creating a practice-based preclearance process for certain election changes, and boosting transparency and enforcement. - Voters in racial, language-minority, and Tribal communities would gain broader legal standards to challenge discrimination. The bill would add distinct Section 2 tests for vote-dilution, vote-denial, and intentional discrimination and add a retrogression standard that applies to actions taken on or after 2021. - State and local election officials would face new preclearance and public-notice rules. Covered changes like election methods, redistricting shifts, ID rules, polling-place moves, and voter-list removals would need review before implementation and require pre-election notices 30 days before Federal elections with 48-hour updates. - The Department of Justice and private citizens would get stronger tools to enforce rights. The Attorney General would centralize observers, extend bilingual protections to 2037, seek preventive relief, issue pre-action information demands, and pursue expanded court remedies.
S1115 — Paycheck Fairness Act
Stronger enforcement against sex-based wage discrimination. This bill would tighten legal remedies, expand pay-data reporting, and fund training and grants to help close persistent pay gaps between men and women. - Workers: Would expand protections so employees can discuss pay without retaliation and pursue compensatory and, for willful misconduct, punitive damages. It also narrows the employer "bona fide factor" defense so pay differences must be job-related and business-necessary. - Employers: Private firms with 100 or more employees would face new pay-data reporting requirements by sex, race, and ethnicity and public disclosure of aggregated results by industry, occupation, and metro area. - Federal contractors and agencies: The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs would restart and expand contractor pay surveys and must annually select not less than half of nonconstruction contractor establishments to report. The Bureau of Labor Statistics would continue tracking women in its employment survey. - Training, grants, and outreach: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and OFCCP must receive training funded by appropriations. A new competitive Negotiation Skills Training grant program would fund entities to teach pay negotiation and report on outcomes.
S3214 — Background Check Expansion Act
Would require background checks for most private firearm transfers by routing them through licensed dealers. This bill would create a new transfer framework that makes it unlawful for two unlicensed people to complete a firearm transfer without a licensed importer, manufacturer, or dealer first taking possession to run the check and comply with federal transfer rules. - Private sellers and buyers would have to route most sales through a licensed importer, manufacturer, or dealer who would take possession to run the background check and follow all transfer requirements. - Licensed importers, manufacturers, and dealers would be required to provide a notice of the prohibition and collect a certification on a form prescribed by the Attorney General before completing a transfer. - Close family and estate transfers would be exempt, including transfers between spouses, domestic partners, parents and children, siblings, aunts or uncles and nieces or nephews, and grandparents and grandchildren, and transfers by operation of law to executors or trustees. - Temporary and specific transfers would be exempt in narrowly defined situations. These include short-term transfers to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm, transfers approved under the tax code, and transfers that occur only at a shooting range or for hunting, trapping, or fishing while the transferor is present and has no reason to believe the transferee is prohibited. - Transfers to law enforcement officers, armed private security professionals acting within official duties, and members of the Armed Forces acting in their official capacity would be exempt. - The bill's amendments would take effect 180 days after enactment.
S2837 — Protect America’s Workforce Act
Protect federal employees' collective bargaining rights. This bill would nullify Executive Orders 14251 and 14343 that exclude certain workers from federal labor-management programs, bar any federal funds from carrying them out, and preserve collective bargaining agreements in effect on March 26, 2025 through their stated terms. - Federal employees and unions: Keeps contracts that existed on March 26, 2025 in force until their agreed expiration, protecting negotiated pay and working conditions. - Federal agencies: Prevents agencies from obligating or spending federal funds to implement the two Executive Orders, blocking efforts to remove those exclusions.
S2556 — Protecting Health Care and Lowering Costs Act
Permanently expands premium tax credits and removes the 400% cap. This bill would make enhanced premium subsidies permanent with a new sliding scale of required premium shares by income and would repeal Subtitle B of Title VII to restore the prior health-related framework. - Households: Families and individuals above 400% of the federal poverty line could qualify for premium tax credits and would face premium caps up to 8.5% of income. - Health law framework: Repeals Subtitle B of Title VII and directs that any law or regulation referenced there apply as if that subtitle had not been enacted, restoring the earlier health-related rules. - Timing: The changes would apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in