Right to Contraception Act
Sponsored By: Senator Edward Markey
Introduced
Summary
This bill would create a federal guarantee of the right to obtain contraception and protect health care providers who offer contraceptives, related information, referrals, and services.
Show full summary
- Individuals and families could obtain contraceptives and receive information or referrals without new federal or state restrictions stated in the bill. The protection expressly covers people regardless of income, race, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, immigration status, or location.
- Health care providers would be protected when they prescribe, dispense, counsel about, or refer for contraceptives. The bill preserves the Food and Drug Administration's authority over approval, clearance, authorization, and licensure of contraceptives.
- The law would preempt state and federal laws that restrict the sale, provision, or use of contraceptives while keeping certain federal coverage requirements intact. It establishes enforcement through private lawsuits and actions by the Attorney General in federal court, including injunctive relief and possible recovery of attorney's fees.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
4 provisions identified: 4 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
Stronger contraceptive rights and enforcement
If enacted, the bill would bar federal and state rules that ban or limit the sale, use, or provision of contraceptives. If enacted, it would also bar rules that stop people from helping others get contraception or that single out providers or clinics. If enacted, the Attorney General and harmed individuals or providers could sue in federal court to stop violating rules. If enacted, courts could order injunctions and must award reasonable lawyer fees to winners.
Clear definitions for contraception and providers
If enacted, the bill would define "contraception" to include drugs, devices, fertility-awareness methods, and sterilization. If enacted, it would define "contraceptive" to mean products approved, cleared, authorized, or licensed under specified FDA and Public Health Service law. If enacted, it would define "health care provider" broadly and list common provider types and which government units count as States.
Federal preemption and agency authority
If enacted, the bill would say it overrides conflicting state and federal rules unless the Act itself preserves them. If enacted, certain federal coverage rules for group health plans and federal programs would remain in force. If enacted, the bill would not limit HHS or FDA authority to approve, clear, authorize, or license contraceptives or the federal government's power to enforce those approvals.
Act takes effect immediately
If enacted, the bill would take effect immediately on the date it is signed. If enacted, its prohibitions, definitions, and enforcement rules would apply right away.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Edward Markey
MA • D
Cosponsors
Tammy Duckworth
IL • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Mazie Hirono
HI • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Tammy Baldwin
WI • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Michael Bennet
CO • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Richard Blumenthal
CT • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Cory Booker
NJ • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Lisa Blunt Rochester
DE • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Maria Cantwell
WA • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Christopher Coons
DE • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Catherine Cortez Masto
NV • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Richard Durbin
IL • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Ruben Gallego
AZ • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Kirsten Gillibrand
NY • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Martin Heinrich
NM • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
John Hickenlooper
CO • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Timothy Kaine
VA • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Andy Kim
NJ • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Amy Klobuchar
MN • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Jeff Merkley
OR • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Christopher Murphy
CT • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Patty Murray
WA • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Jon Ossoff
GA • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Alex Padilla
CA • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Gary Peters
MI • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
John Reed
RI • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Jacky Rosen
NV • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Bernie Sanders
VT • I
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Brian Schatz
HI • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Jeanne Shaheen
NH • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Elissa Slotkin
MI • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Tina Smith
MN • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Chris Van Hollen
MD • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Mark Warner
VA • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Raphael Warnock
GA • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Elizabeth Warren
MA • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Peter Welch
VT • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Sheldon Whitehouse
RI • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Ron Wyden
OR • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
John Fetterman
PA • D
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Sen. Luján, Ben Ray [D-NM]
NM • D
Sponsored 2/12/2025
Angela Alsobrooks
MD • D
Sponsored 6/12/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
S1503 — Equality Act
Treat sexual orientation and gender identity as forms of sex discrimination across federal law. The bill would explicitly add sexual orientation and gender identity to federal sex‑discrimination protections and apply those rules across many statutes and programs.
S2150 — Women’s Health Protection Act of 2025
Guarantee nationwide protections for a person's right to obtain abortion services and a provider's right to deliver them. The Women's Health Protection Act of 2025 would create a federal rule that stops laws and rules that single out abortion or place heavier burdens on abortion than on similar medical procedures. It defines key terms, protects pre-viability care, allows post-viability care to protect life or health, and explicitly protects interstate travel and the movement of medicines, equipment, patients, and providers. - Families and patients: Would protect access to abortion before viability and allow post-viability care when needed to protect life or health. It would bar medically unnecessary in-person visit rules and stop forced disclosure of why a patient seeks care. - Health care providers: Would protect providers' ability to give abortion care including by telemedicine and across state lines, and would forbid facility, staffing, testing, or disclosure requirements that are not required for similar procedures. - States and interstate commerce: Would preempt conflicting state laws and recognize a right to travel and to assist others in getting reproductive health services across state lines. - Courts and enforcement: Would let the Attorney General sue and would create a private right of action so patients and providers can seek injunctive relief and attorney's fees. It would limit state sovereign immunity where federal law allows challenges.
S2523 — John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025
This bill would restore and strengthen federal voting-rights protections by rewriting Section 2, creating a practice-based preclearance process for certain election changes, and boosting transparency and enforcement. - Voters in racial, language-minority, and Tribal communities would gain broader legal standards to challenge discrimination. The bill would add distinct Section 2 tests for vote-dilution, vote-denial, and intentional discrimination and add a retrogression standard that applies to actions taken on or after 2021. - State and local election officials would face new preclearance and public-notice rules. Covered changes like election methods, redistricting shifts, ID rules, polling-place moves, and voter-list removals would need review before implementation and require pre-election notices 30 days before Federal elections with 48-hour updates. - The Department of Justice and private citizens would get stronger tools to enforce rights. The Attorney General would centralize observers, extend bilingual protections to 2037, seek preventive relief, issue pre-action information demands, and pursue expanded court remedies.
S1115 — Paycheck Fairness Act
Stronger enforcement against sex-based wage discrimination. This bill would tighten legal remedies, expand pay-data reporting, and fund training and grants to help close persistent pay gaps between men and women. - Workers: Would expand protections so employees can discuss pay without retaliation and pursue compensatory and, for willful misconduct, punitive damages. It also narrows the employer "bona fide factor" defense so pay differences must be job-related and business-necessary. - Employers: Private firms with 100 or more employees would face new pay-data reporting requirements by sex, race, and ethnicity and public disclosure of aggregated results by industry, occupation, and metro area. - Federal contractors and agencies: The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs would restart and expand contractor pay surveys and must annually select not less than half of nonconstruction contractor establishments to report. The Bureau of Labor Statistics would continue tracking women in its employment survey. - Training, grants, and outreach: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and OFCCP must receive training funded by appropriations. A new competitive Negotiation Skills Training grant program would fund entities to teach pay negotiation and report on outcomes.
S51 — Washington, D.C. Admission Act
This bill would admit the District of Columbia as the State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth, giving its residents full congressional representation. It would also carve out a separate federal 'Capital' around core federal buildings and set a staged transition for courts, services, and federal property. - Residents: District residents would gain two Senators and one Representative immediately upon admission and the current non‑voting Delegate office would be repealed. - Territory and federal limits: A defined Capital area including the Capitol, White House, Supreme Court, and adjacent federal lands would remain under U.S. title or jurisdiction and generally would not be subject to state taxation except where Congress permits. - Courts, justice, and transition supports: The bill would keep federal prosecution support, U.S. Marshals services, pretrial and public defender arrangements, and Bureau of Prisons housing rules during transition; it would provide a temporary Federal Medical Assistance Percentage uplift for five years and establish an 18‑member Statehood Transition Commission to oversee the change.
S3214 — Background Check Expansion Act
Would require background checks for most private firearm transfers by routing them through licensed dealers. This bill would create a new transfer framework that makes it unlawful for two unlicensed people to complete a firearm transfer without a licensed importer, manufacturer, or dealer first taking possession to run the check and comply with federal transfer rules. - Private sellers and buyers would have to route most sales through a licensed importer, manufacturer, or dealer who would take possession to run the background check and follow all transfer requirements. - Licensed importers, manufacturers, and dealers would be required to provide a notice of the prohibition and collect a certification on a form prescribed by the Attorney General before completing a transfer. - Close family and estate transfers would be exempt, including transfers between spouses, domestic partners, parents and children, siblings, aunts or uncles and nieces or nephews, and grandparents and grandchildren, and transfers by operation of law to executors or trustees. - Temporary and specific transfers would be exempt in narrowly defined situations. These include short-term transfers to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm, transfers approved under the tax code, and transfers that occur only at a shooting range or for hunting, trapping, or fishing while the transferor is present and has no reason to believe the transferee is prohibited. - Transfers to law enforcement officers, armed private security professionals acting within official duties, and members of the Armed Forces acting in their official capacity would be exempt. - The bill's amendments would take effect 180 days after enactment.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in