Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2025
Sponsored By: Senator Bernie Sanders
Introduced
Summary
Strengthens worker organizing rights and enforcement. The bill would expand who counts as employees and joint employers, speed representation and bargaining, require voter lists and workplace postings, and increase penalties and remedies for unfair labor practices.
Show full summary
- Workers and jobseekers: Would broaden employee coverage and set a three-factor test that presumes employee status unless all three criteria are met. It would protect use of employer-provided electronic communications for organizing and clarify that the duration or pattern of strikes does not strip protection.
- Employers and bargaining: Would require employers to provide unions detailed voter lists and timely notices. It would force a fast initial bargaining process with mandatory mediation and binding arbitration if negotiations fail.
- Enforcement and remedies: Would expand National Labor Relations Board authority, allow private civil suits after a waiting period, make Board orders immediately effective, and raise civil penalties for unfair labor practices to up to $50,000 per violation and up to $100,000 for repeat or aggravated offenses.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
7 provisions identified: 4 benefits, 1 costs, 2 mixed.
Faster relief and larger damage awards
If enacted, charges alleging serious unfair labor practices would get fast investigations and quick court relief. If the Board finds a violation, workers could get full back pay, front pay, and consequential damages. They could also get liquidated damages equal to two times awarded damages. Workers could file a private federal lawsuit after waiting 60 days if the Board has not acted.
More workers treated as employees
If enacted, most people who do work would be presumed employees unless three strict conditions are all met. The bill tightens joint‑employer rules to cover indirect or reserved control. It also narrows who counts as a supervisor. Misrepresenting a worker as a contractor would be an unfair labor practice.
Binding first-contract arbitration and fees
If enacted, a union win would require bargaining to start within 10 days. If no agreement in 90 days, mediation then binding arbitration could set a first contract for two years. Arbitration must consider employer finances, local living costs, and comparable industry wages. Collective agreements could also require all unit employees to pay representation fees even if state law bans such fees.
Ban on employer coercion and forced waivers
If enacted, employers could not force employees to attend campaign activities unrelated to job duties. Most pre‑dispute class or collective waivers would be invalid and unenforceable. Employers could not promise to permanently replace strikers or punish workers for striking. The bill would also narrow a reporting exemption for many employer‑led meetings and trainings.
Speeding up union elections and voter lists
If enacted, the Board would speed election timelines and require fast pre‑election hearings. Employers would have to give unions a detailed voter list within two business days. Elections would be scheduled by the 20th business day after direction unless paused for a timely unfair labor charge. The Board could set aside tainted elections and certify unions where prior authorizations exist.
Higher fines and faster NLRB enforcement
If enacted, Board orders would take effect on issuance and the NLRB could seek quick injunctions and daily penalties for noncompliance. Employers could face civil penalties up to $50,000 per unfair labor violation, and up to $100,000 for serious or repeat violations. Fines up to $10,000 per violation could be imposed for disobeying Board orders, and $500 per posting or voter‑list violation. The bill also authorizes such sums as may be necessary and restores detailed NLRB recusal reporting.
Repeal of LMRA section 303
If enacted, the bill would repeal LMRA section 303 (29 U.S.C. 187). The repeal would remove that statutory provision from the code. The bill does not say what financial effects, if any, would follow.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Bernie Sanders
VT • I
Cosponsors
Patty Murray
WA • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Charles Schumer
NY • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Angela Alsobrooks
MD • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Tammy Baldwin
WI • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Michael Bennet
CO • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Richard Blumenthal
CT • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Lisa Blunt Rochester
DE • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Cory Booker
NJ • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Maria Cantwell
WA • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Christopher Coons
DE • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Catherine Cortez Masto
NV • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Tammy Duckworth
IL • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Richard Durbin
IL • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
John Fetterman
PA • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Ruben Gallego
AZ • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Kirsten Gillibrand
NY • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Maggie Hassan
NH • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Martin Heinrich
NM • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
John Hickenlooper
CO • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Mazie Hirono
HI • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Timothy Kaine
VA • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Mark Kelly
AZ • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Andy Kim
NJ • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Angus King
ME • I
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Amy Klobuchar
MN • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Sen. Luján, Ben Ray [D-NM]
NM • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Edward Markey
MA • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Jeff Merkley
OR • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Christopher Murphy
CT • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Jon Ossoff
GA • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Alex Padilla
CA • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Gary Peters
MI • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
John Reed
RI • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Jacky Rosen
NV • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Brian Schatz
HI • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Adam Schiff
CA • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Jeanne Shaheen
NH • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Elissa Slotkin
MI • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Tina Smith
MN • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Chris Van Hollen
MD • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Raphael Warnock
GA • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Elizabeth Warren
MA • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Peter Welch
VT • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Sheldon Whitehouse
RI • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Ron Wyden
OR • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
S1503 — Equality Act
Treat sexual orientation and gender identity as forms of sex discrimination across federal law. The bill would explicitly add sexual orientation and gender identity to federal sex‑discrimination protections and apply those rules across many statutes and programs.
S2150 — Women’s Health Protection Act of 2025
Guarantee nationwide protections for a person's right to obtain abortion services and a provider's right to deliver them. The Women's Health Protection Act of 2025 would create a federal rule that stops laws and rules that single out abortion or place heavier burdens on abortion than on similar medical procedures. It defines key terms, protects pre-viability care, allows post-viability care to protect life or health, and explicitly protects interstate travel and the movement of medicines, equipment, patients, and providers. - Families and patients: Would protect access to abortion before viability and allow post-viability care when needed to protect life or health. It would bar medically unnecessary in-person visit rules and stop forced disclosure of why a patient seeks care. - Health care providers: Would protect providers' ability to give abortion care including by telemedicine and across state lines, and would forbid facility, staffing, testing, or disclosure requirements that are not required for similar procedures. - States and interstate commerce: Would preempt conflicting state laws and recognize a right to travel and to assist others in getting reproductive health services across state lines. - Courts and enforcement: Would let the Attorney General sue and would create a private right of action so patients and providers can seek injunctive relief and attorney's fees. It would limit state sovereign immunity where federal law allows challenges.
S2523 — John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025
This bill would restore and strengthen federal voting-rights protections by rewriting Section 2, creating a practice-based preclearance process for certain election changes, and boosting transparency and enforcement. - Voters in racial, language-minority, and Tribal communities would gain broader legal standards to challenge discrimination. The bill would add distinct Section 2 tests for vote-dilution, vote-denial, and intentional discrimination and add a retrogression standard that applies to actions taken on or after 2021. - State and local election officials would face new preclearance and public-notice rules. Covered changes like election methods, redistricting shifts, ID rules, polling-place moves, and voter-list removals would need review before implementation and require pre-election notices 30 days before Federal elections with 48-hour updates. - The Department of Justice and private citizens would get stronger tools to enforce rights. The Attorney General would centralize observers, extend bilingual protections to 2037, seek preventive relief, issue pre-action information demands, and pursue expanded court remedies.
S1115 — Paycheck Fairness Act
Stronger enforcement against sex-based wage discrimination. This bill would tighten legal remedies, expand pay-data reporting, and fund training and grants to help close persistent pay gaps between men and women. - Workers: Would expand protections so employees can discuss pay without retaliation and pursue compensatory and, for willful misconduct, punitive damages. It also narrows the employer "bona fide factor" defense so pay differences must be job-related and business-necessary. - Employers: Private firms with 100 or more employees would face new pay-data reporting requirements by sex, race, and ethnicity and public disclosure of aggregated results by industry, occupation, and metro area. - Federal contractors and agencies: The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs would restart and expand contractor pay surveys and must annually select not less than half of nonconstruction contractor establishments to report. The Bureau of Labor Statistics would continue tracking women in its employment survey. - Training, grants, and outreach: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and OFCCP must receive training funded by appropriations. A new competitive Negotiation Skills Training grant program would fund entities to teach pay negotiation and report on outcomes.
S3214 — Background Check Expansion Act
Would require background checks for most private firearm transfers by routing them through licensed dealers. This bill would create a new transfer framework that makes it unlawful for two unlicensed people to complete a firearm transfer without a licensed importer, manufacturer, or dealer first taking possession to run the check and comply with federal transfer rules. - Private sellers and buyers would have to route most sales through a licensed importer, manufacturer, or dealer who would take possession to run the background check and follow all transfer requirements. - Licensed importers, manufacturers, and dealers would be required to provide a notice of the prohibition and collect a certification on a form prescribed by the Attorney General before completing a transfer. - Close family and estate transfers would be exempt, including transfers between spouses, domestic partners, parents and children, siblings, aunts or uncles and nieces or nephews, and grandparents and grandchildren, and transfers by operation of law to executors or trustees. - Temporary and specific transfers would be exempt in narrowly defined situations. These include short-term transfers to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm, transfers approved under the tax code, and transfers that occur only at a shooting range or for hunting, trapping, or fishing while the transferor is present and has no reason to believe the transferee is prohibited. - Transfers to law enforcement officers, armed private security professionals acting within official duties, and members of the Armed Forces acting in their official capacity would be exempt. - The bill's amendments would take effect 180 days after enactment.
S2837 — Protect America’s Workforce Act
Protect federal employees' collective bargaining rights. This bill would nullify Executive Orders 14251 and 14343 that exclude certain workers from federal labor-management programs, bar any federal funds from carrying them out, and preserve collective bargaining agreements in effect on March 26, 2025 through their stated terms. - Federal employees and unions: Keeps contracts that existed on March 26, 2025 in force until their agreed expiration, protecting negotiated pay and working conditions. - Federal agencies: Prevents agencies from obligating or spending federal funds to implement the two Executive Orders, blocking efforts to remove those exclusions.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in