IllinoisSB3020104th General Assembly (2025–2026)SenateWALLET

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE-HARASSMENT

Sponsored By: Adriane L. Johnson (Democratic)

Signed by Governor

Summary

Amends the Protective Orders Article of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Changes the definition of "harassment". Provides that the court may order the respondent to cease harassment. Establishes procedures for motions to extend plenary protective orders. Provides that the court may order the respondent to stop creating, using, and disseminating; remove; and delete the following harassing conduct: (1) any and all material or statements that constitute harassment, including, but not limited to, doxing, electronically generated or digitally altered content, and sexual private images and digitally altered sexual images; and (2) any and all electronic tracking or monitoring devices, system, or other electronic means, or tracking information. Provides that the court may order the respondent to present sufficient evidence that such compliance has occurred. Amends the Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986 to make conforming changes.

assignmentscriminal lawjudiciary - civil

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

9 provisions identified: 9 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.

Longer protection through order extensions

A court can extend an emergency or interim order when the legal requirements are met; a new violation or abuse incident is not required. A court must extend a plenary order when the legal requirements are met and relevant circumstances have not materially changed. Extensions can last more than two years for good cause. If an order would expire before the next available court date, the court must expedite the hearing and can extend or restore the order while the case is pending.

More money relief after abuse

A court can order a respondent to repay losses directly caused by abuse. These can include medical bills, lost pay or support, property repairs, legal costs, moving or travel, temporary shelter, meals, and costs to find a concealed child. A court can also order temporary support for a petitioner or child when the respondent has a legal duty to pay. Child-support amounts and payment rules follow state family-law procedures.

More control over homes and property

A court can bar a respondent from entering or staying in a home while under the influence of alcohol or drugs if the respondent threatens the petitioner or the petitioner’s children. A court can give the petitioner temporary use of personal property when the petitioner owns it, or when sharing jointly owned property risks abuse or is impractical and the hardships favor the petitioner. A court can also stop a respondent from moving, hiding, damaging, or disposing of property, and from improperly using an aged household member’s resources.

Firearm surrender under protection orders

People under Illinois protection orders generally cannot possess firearms, certain firearm parts, or a firearm owner card. Firearms at hand when the order is served must be surrendered then; other covered items are due within 24 hours. When sworn evidence shows an immediate threat, possession, and the items’ location, a court must issue a requested search warrant. The warrant must be carried out within 96 hours. Eligible people can request their items back after the order ends, and they must be returned within 14 days of the request.

More paths to seek protection orders

A person abused before a family or household member’s incarceration can use a filing path when that person is still incarcerated. A person may also seek protection based on prior abuse by a family or household member convicted of a covered offense. Courts cannot deny an order only because the petitioner or respondent is incarcerated.

More protection from online harassment

Repeated contact, electronic tracking, certain image sharing, impersonation content, and publishing personal information can count as presumed emotional harm. The conduct must be knowing, unreasonable, and cause distress to the petitioner and a reasonable person. A respondent can rebut the presumption with stronger evidence, and other harassment rules still apply. A court can also order harassing materials or tracking information removed and require proof of compliance.

Stronger child safety in protection cases

When a respondent is charged with abusing a child, the court presumes that giving the respondent physical care or temporary decision-making power is not in the child’s best interest. The presumption can be rebutted. Courts must limit or deny parenting time when the respondent has harmed or may harm the child, abused or harassed protected people, concealed or held the child, or acted against the child’s interests. Courts can also bar a child’s removal from Illinois, require the respondent to appear or return the child, and set clear parenting-time rules.

Remote hearings for protection orders

A person seeking a protection order can ask for a remote hearing. The court must allow it unless there is good cause to deny the request. Petitioners, witnesses, and respondents can appear remotely or in person. Courts must post information about requesting and attending remote hearings.

Protection for animals in the home

In a protection-order case, a court can give the petitioner care or control of an animal connected to either household, including an animal held by a child living there. The court can order the respondent to stay away and stop the respondent from taking, hiding, harming, or disposing of the animal.

Sponsors & Cosponsors

Sponsor

  • Adriane L. Johnson

    Democratic • Senate

Cosponsors

  • Amy Briel

    Democratic • House

  • Anne Stava

    Democratic • House

  • Anthony DeLuca

    Democratic • House

  • Bill Cunningham

    Democratic • Senate

  • Camille Y. Lilly

    Democratic • House

  • Carol Ammons

    Democratic • House

  • Chris Balkema

    Republican • Senate

  • Cristina Castro

    Democratic • Senate

  • Dagmara Avelar

    Democratic • House

  • Darby A. Hills

    Republican • Senate

  • David Koehler

    Democratic • Senate

  • Debbie Meyers-Martin

    Democratic • House

  • Jason Plummer

    Republican • Senate

  • Javier L. Cervantes

    Democratic • Senate

  • Joyce Mason

    Democratic • House

  • Justin Cochran

    Democratic • House

  • Kelly M. Cassidy

    Democratic • House

  • Laura Ellman

    Democratic • Senate

  • Laura M. Murphy

    Democratic • Senate

  • Li Arellano, Jr.

    Republican • Senate

  • Lilian Jiménez

    Democratic • House

  • Linda Holmes

    Democratic • Senate

  • Mary Beth Canty

    Democratic • House

  • Mary Edly-Allen

    Democratic • Senate

  • Mattie Hunter

    Democratic • Senate

  • Maura Hirschauer

    Democratic • House

  • Maurice A. West, II

    Democratic • House

  • Meg Loughran Cappel

    Democratic • Senate

  • Mike Porfirio

    Democratic • Senate

  • Mike Simmons

    Democratic • Senate

  • Nabeela Syed

    Democratic • House

  • Natalie A. Manley

    Democratic • House

  • Rachel Ventura

    Democratic • Senate

  • Ryan Spain

    Republican • House

  • Sara Feigenholtz

    Democratic • Senate

  • Stephanie A. Kifowit

    Democratic • House

  • Steve Stadelman

    Democratic • Senate

  • Sue Scherer

    Democratic • House

  • Suzanne M. Ness

    Democratic • House

  • Willie Preston

    Democratic • Senate

Roll Call Votes

All Roll Calls

Yes: 317 • No: 36

Senate vote • 5/31/2026

House Committee Amendment No. 1 Senate Concurs

Yes: 57 • No: 0

Senate vote • 5/31/2026

House Floor Amendment No. 3 Senate Concurs

Yes: 57 • No: 0

Senate vote • 5/28/2026

House Floor Amendment No. 3 Motion To Concur Recommended Do Adopt Criminal Law;

Yes: 8 • No: 0

Senate vote • 5/28/2026

House Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion To Concur Recommended Do Adopt Criminal Law;

Yes: 8 • No: 0

House vote • 5/27/2026

Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed

Yes: 91 • No: 23

House vote • 5/20/2026

House Floor Amendment No. 3 Recommends Be Adopted Judiciary - Civil Committee;

Yes: 12 • No: 6

House vote • 5/13/2026

Do Pass as Amended / Short Debate Judiciary - Civil Committee;

Yes: 13 • No: 7

Senate vote • 4/14/2026

Third Reading - Passed;

Yes: 55 • No: 0

Senate vote • 3/24/2026

Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Recommend Do Adopt Criminal Law;

Yes: 7 • No: 0

Senate vote • 3/11/2026

Do Pass as Amended Criminal Law;

Yes: 9 • No: 0

Actions Timeline

  1. Public Act . . . . . . . . . 104-0754

    8/7/2026Senate
  2. Effective Date January 1, 2027

    8/7/2026Senate
  3. Governor Approved

    8/7/2026Senate
  4. Sent to the Governor

    6/29/2026Senate
  5. Passed Both Houses

    5/31/2026Senate
  6. Senate Concurs

    5/31/2026Senate
  7. House Floor Amendment No. 3 Senate Concurs 057-000-000

    5/31/2026Senate
  8. House Committee Amendment No. 1 Senate Concurs 057-000-000

    5/31/2026Senate
  9. House Floor Amendment No. 3 Motion To Concur Recommended Do Adopt Criminal Law; 008-000-000

    5/28/2026Senate
  10. House Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion To Concur Recommended Do Adopt Criminal Law; 008-000-000

    5/28/2026Senate
  11. House Floor Amendment No. 3 Motion to Concur Assignments Referred to Criminal Law

    5/28/2026Senate
  12. House Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Assignments Referred to Criminal Law

    5/28/2026Senate
  13. House Floor Amendment No. 3 Motion to Concur Referred to Assignments

    5/28/2026Senate
  14. House Floor Amendment No. 3 Motion to Concur Filed with Secretary Sen. Adriane L. Johnson

    5/28/2026Senate
  15. House Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Referred to Assignments

    5/28/2026Senate
  16. House Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Filed with Secretary Sen. Adriane L. Johnson

    5/28/2026Senate
  17. Placed on Calendar Order of Concurrence House Amendment(s) 1, 3 - May 29, 2026

    5/28/2026Senate
  18. Secretary's Desk - Concurrence House Amendment(s) 1, 3

    5/28/2026Senate
  19. Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Debbie Meyers-Martin

    5/27/2026House
  20. Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Carol Ammons

    5/27/2026House
  21. Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 091-023-000

    5/27/2026House
  22. Added as Co-Sponsor Sen. Javier L. Cervantes

    5/26/2026Senate
  23. Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Anthony DeLuca

    5/25/2026House
  24. Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Joyce Mason

    5/25/2026House
  25. Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Natalie A. Manley

    5/25/2026House

Bill Text

  • Engrossed

  • Enrolled

  • House Amendment 1

  • House Amendment 2

  • House Amendment 3

  • Introduced

  • Senate Amendment 1

  • Senate Amendment 2

Related Bills

Back to State Legislation