OregonSB 15852026 Regular SessionSenateWALLET

Relating to matching grants for cities; and prescribing an effective date.

Sponsored By: Deb Patterson (Democratic), Dick Anderson (Republican), Ed Diehl (Republican), Floyd Prozanski (Democratic), James Manning Jr. (Democratic), Janeen Sollman (Democratic), Mark Meek (Democratic)

Became Law

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

6 provisions identified: 5 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.

Lower matches for small city projects

For certain state grants to cities, required matches are lower for small incorporated cities. Cities with 5,000 people or fewer match up to 3% for projects at $100,000 or less, and up to 5% for larger projects. Cities over 5,000 to 7,500 match up to 7%; over 7,500 to 10,000 up to 9%; and over 10,000 to 20,000 up to 12%. These cities can also use grant money for planning, engineering, support, and construction. Population counts come from the most recent federal census.

Lower matches for small city water projects

Small incorporated cities get lower matches for state water grants. For feasibility awards: 5,000 people or fewer match up to 3% for awards at $100,000 or less, and up to 5% for larger awards. For both feasibility and water supply grants: cities over 5,000 to 7,500 match up to 7%; over 7,500 to 10,000 up to 9%; and over 10,000 to 20,000 up to 12%. These cities can use money for planning, engineering, support, and construction. Population counts come from the most recent federal census.

Small city help for school safety projects

The law lowers the cash match small incorporated cities pay for school‑area safety projects. Cities with 5,000 people or fewer match up to 3% for projects at $100,000 or less, and up to 5% for larger projects. Cities over 5,000 to 7,500 match up to 7%; over 7,500 to 10,000 up to 9%; and over 10,000 to 20,000 up to 12%. These cities can use grant money for planning, engineering, support, and construction. The Transportation Commission can cut required matches further. The Commission also gives higher priority to projects within two miles of a pre‑K–12 school. Population counts come from the most recent federal census.

Small city help for transport grants

For transportation grants, small incorporated cities owe a much smaller match. Cities with 5,000 people or fewer match up to 3% for projects at $100,000 or less, and up to 5% for larger projects. Cities over 5,000 to 7,500 match up to 7%; over 7,500 to 10,000 up to 9%; and over 10,000 to 20,000 up to 12%. These cities can also use grant money for planning, engineering, support, and construction. Population counts come from the most recent federal census.

Small city help for walking and biking

For walking and biking grants, small incorporated cities pay lower matches. Cities with 5,000 people or fewer match up to 3% for projects at $100,000 or less, and up to 5% for larger projects. Cities over 5,000 to 7,500 match up to 7%; over 7,500 to 10,000 up to 9%; and over 10,000 to 20,000 up to 12%. These cities can use grant money for planning, engineering, support, and construction. Population counts come from the most recent federal census.

More levee help and capped planning grants

For levee projects that protect small cities, required matches are much lower. Cities with 5,000 people or fewer match up to 3% for grants at $100,000 or less, and up to 5% for larger grants. Cities over 5,000 to 7,500 match up to 7%; over 7,500 to 10,000 up to 9%; and over 10,000 to 20,000 up to 12%. Small cities can use levee grant money for planning, engineering, support, and construction. Planning grants are capped at $2 million per applicant every two years. The state also creates a Levee Project Grant Fund to support these awards. Population counts come from the most recent federal census.

Sponsors & Cosponsors

Sponsors

  • Deb Patterson

    Democratic • Senate

  • Dick Anderson

    Republican • Senate

  • Ed Diehl

    Republican • House

  • Floyd Prozanski

    Democratic • Senate

  • James Manning Jr.

    Democratic • Senate

  • Janeen Sollman

    Democratic • Senate

  • Mark Meek

    Democratic • Senate

Cosponsors

  • Anthony Broadman

    Democratic • Senate

  • Bobby Levy

    Republican • House

  • Boomer Wright

    Republican • House

  • Cedric Hayden

    Republican • Senate

  • Chris Gorsek

    Democratic • Senate

  • Christine Drazan

    Republican • Senate

  • Court Boice

    Republican • House

  • Darcey Edwards

    Republican • House

  • Darin Harbick

    Republican • House

  • David Brock Smith

    Republican • Senate

  • David Gomberg

    Democratic • House

  • Dwayne Yunker

    Republican • House

  • Emily McIntire

    Republican • House

  • Jami Cate

    Republican • House

  • Jeff Golden

    Democratic • Senate

  • Jeffrey Helfrich

    Republican • House

  • Ken Helm

    Democratic • House

  • Kevin Mannix

    Republican • House

  • Kim Thatcher

    Republican • Senate

  • Lamar Wise

    Democratic • House

  • Lesly Muñoz

    Democratic • House

  • Lisa Fragala

    Democratic • House

  • Mark Gamba

    Democratic • House

  • Mark Owens

    Republican • House

  • Matt Bunch

    Republican • House

  • Paul Evans

    Democratic • House

  • Rick Lewis

    Republican • House

  • Sue Rieke Smith

    Democratic • House

  • Susan McLain

    Democratic • House

  • Suzanne Weber

    Republican • Senate

  • Todd Nash

    Republican • Senate

  • Travis Nelson

    Democratic • House

  • Zach Hudson

    Democratic • House

Roll Call Votes

All Roll Calls

Yes: 93 • No: 8

House vote 3/6/2026

Rules: Heard and Reported Out

Yes: 7 • No: 0

House vote 3/6/2026

Rules suspended. Third reading. Carried by Diehl. Passed.

Yes: 46 • No: 5

House vote 2/26/2026

Commerce and Consumer Protection: Heard and Reported Out

Yes: 10 • No: 0

Senate vote 2/19/2026

Third reading. Carried by Manning Jr. Passed.

Yes: 25 • No: 3

Senate vote 2/16/2026

Commerce and General Government: Heard and Reported Out with Amendments

Yes: 5 • No: 0

Actions Timeline

  1. Effective date, June 5, 2026.

    4/14/2026Senate
  2. Chapter 134, 2026 Laws.

    4/14/2026Senate
  3. Governor signed.

    4/7/2026Senate
  4. Speaker signed.

    3/10/2026House
  5. President signed.

    3/10/2026Senate
  6. Rules suspended. Third reading. Carried by Diehl. Passed.

    3/6/2026House
  7. Second reading.

    3/6/2026House
  8. Recommendation: Do pass.

    3/6/2026House
  9. Work Session held.

    3/6/2026House
  10. Referred to Rules by order of Speaker.

    2/26/2026House
  11. Without recommendation as to passage and be referred to Rules.

    2/26/2026House
  12. Work Session held.

    2/26/2026House
  13. Public Hearing held.

    2/24/2026House
  14. Referred to Commerce and Consumer Protection.

    2/20/2026House
  15. First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.

    2/19/2026House
  16. Third reading. Carried by Manning Jr. Passed.

    2/19/2026Senate
  17. Second reading.

    2/18/2026Senate
  18. Recommendation: Do pass with amendments. (Printed A-Eng.)

    2/17/2026Senate
  19. Work Session held.

    2/16/2026Senate
  20. Public Hearing held.

    2/9/2026Senate
  21. Referred to Commerce and General Government.

    2/2/2026Senate
  22. Introduction and first reading. Referred to President's desk.

    2/2/2026Senate

Bill Text

  • Enrolled

    3/6/2026

  • A-Engrossed

    2/17/2026

  • Senate Amendments to Introduced

    2/17/2026

  • SCGG Amendment -2 (Adopted)

    2/16/2026

  • SCGG Amendment -1 (Proposed)

    2/11/2026

  • SCGG Amendment -2 (Proposed)

    2/11/2026

  • SCGG Amendment -1 (Proposed)

    2/9/2026

  • Introduced

    1/28/2026

Related Bills

Back to State Legislation