All Roll Calls
Yes: 64 • No: 0
Sponsored By: Mike Oliverio (Republican)
Failed
Personalized for You
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
5 provisions identified: 5 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
Qualifying surviving spouses receive 50% of the judge’s office salary each year, up from 40%. The salary base is the office held at the judge’s death, resignation, or retirement. The judge must have been eligible for retirement at death or served at least five years as a sitting judge. Coverage applies when the judge dies in office or after resigning or retiring under the retirement system. Payments rise or fall with judicial salaries and end when the spouse dies or remarries.
Judges first appointed or elected after July 1, 2005, gain access to the main retirement path. That path requires at least 14 years as a sitting judge, in addition to its age and service requirements. An alternate path provides a pension at age 65 after at least 12 full years as a sitting judge. Judges using this option must have made required fund payments for every month served. This lifetime pension is based on 16 years of credited service, reduced using pension calculations; the law does not specify the reduction amount.
For judges first appointed or elected after July 1, 2005, dependent-child payments now follow the general salary-based rule. The law removes the final-average-salary limit and the ban on increases tied to judicial pay raises. Payments rise or fall with judicial salaries, with all eligible children together capped at 40% of the applicable salary. Benefits require no surviving spouse, or the death of a spouse receiving benefits who leaves the judge’s dependent children. Payments continue until age 18, or age 23 while the child remains a full-time student.
The law removes a statutory section limiting increases in judges’ retirement benefits. It also repeals a section governing adjusted annual retirement benefit calculations. The provided text does not explain the old calculation rules or establish how much or when individual payments change.
West Virginia courts stop making employer contributions while the judges’ pension fund’s funded ratio is at least 150%. Contributions resume when that ratio falls below 150%. This reduces courts’ required payments during the pause; it does not directly change household benefits.
Mike Oliverio
Republican • Senate
Joey Garcia
Democratic • Senate
Tom Takubo
Republican • Senate
Mike Woelfel
Democratic • Senate
All Roll Calls
Yes: 64 • No: 0
Senate vote • 3/2/2026
Passed Senate (Roll No. 284)
Yes: 32 • No: 0
Senate vote • 3/2/2026
Effective July 1, 2026 (Roll No. 285)
Yes: 32 • No: 0
House received Senate message
Introduced in House
To Finance
To House Finance
On 3rd reading
Read 3rd time
Passed Senate (Roll No. 284)
Effective July 1, 2026 (Roll No. 285)
Ordered to House
On 2nd reading
Read 2nd time
Reported do pass
Immediate consideration
Read 1st time
Committee substitute reported, but first to Finance
To Finance
Filed for introduction
To Pensions then Finance
Introduced in Senate
To Pensions
Committee Substitute
Introduced Version
HB 5694, Supplemental appropriation to Department of Education, fund 0313.
HB 5353, To bring virtual currency kiosks within the purview of money transmission licensure and create disclosure requirements and daily transaction limitations for new and existing customers.
HB 4452, To remove Mortmain restrictions on religious organizations
HB 4390, Relating to the temporary payment to a kinship parent of a subsidy equal to that of a foster parent
HB 4354, Relating to necessity allowance
HB 4191, Relating to providing child care generally