100 opinions issued in 2004.
Opinion 2004-L-40 — Rhonda Ehlis, Gladstone City Attorney
Jun 1, 2004
LETTER OPINION 2004-L-40 June 1, 2004 Ms. Rhonda R. Ehlis Gladstone City Attorney PO Box 570 Dickinson, ND 58602-0570 Dear Ms. Ehlis: Thank you for your letter asking whether a protest against an improvement project which fails to describe the property subject to the protest is legally sufficient. It is my opinion that a protest which fails to describe the property subject to the protest is legally insufficient and, therefore, invalid. ANALYSIS If a property owner wishes to protest the creation of an improvement project, the property owner must comply with N.D.C.C. § 40-22-17. Section 40-22-1
Opinion 2004-L-39 — Michael Polovitz, State Senator
May 27, 2004
LETTER OPINION 2004-L-39 May 27, 2004 Honorable Michael Polovitz State Senator 2529 9th Avenue North Grand Forks, ND 58203-2278 Dear Senator Polovitz: Thank you for your letter asking several questions about the applicability of federal law 1 regarding disclaimers 2 on political ads you may run in your campaign for reelection to the state Senate. While this office cannot give private legal advice, your questions do address issues that have a general statewide impact. Consequently, while I cannot give advice on your specific advertisement, in the interest of clarifying the law for state and
Opinion 2004-L-38 — William E. Kretschmar, Ashley City Attorney
May 26, 2004
LETTER OPINION 2004-L-38 May 26, 2004 Mr. William E. Kretschmar Ashley City Attorney PO Box 97 Ashley, ND 58413-0097 Dear Mr. Kretschmar: Thank you for your letter asking several questions about the authority of the Ashley City Council to reduce special assessments and about any appeal procedures for persons aggrieved by the failure of the city council to make reductions. I t is my opinion that a home rule city that has not enacted ordinances permitting the city council to reduce special assessments based on ability to pay or value of the property assessed is subject to state law, whi