30 opinions issued in 2011.
Opinion 2011-O-17 — Minto City Council
Dec 22, 2011
OPEN RECORDS AND MEETINGS OPINION 2011-O-17 DATE ISSUED: December 22, 2011 ISSUED TO: Minto City Council CITIZEN’S REQUEST FOR OPINION This office received a request for an opinion under N.D.C.C. § 44-04-21.1 from Melvin Tibert asking whether the Minto City Council (Council) violated N.D.C.C. §§ 44-04-19 and 44-04-20 by holding a meeting that was not preceded by public notice. FACTS PRESENTED On June 2, 2011, a Summons and Complaint regarding Melvin Tibert’s legal action for quiet title was served on the city of Minto (City). On June 3, the mayor contacted all but one Council member.
Opinion 2011-L-13 — Craig Headland, House Representative
Dec 22, 2011
LETTER OPINION 2011-L-13 December 22, 2011 The Honorable Craig Headland District 29 House of Representatives 4950 92nd Ave SE Montpelier, ND 58472-9630 Dear Representative Headland: Thank you for your letter requesting an opinion on whether the language in state law or in a county home rule charter governs, regarding the number of petition signatures required in order to amend or repeal the county home rule charter. Based on the following analysis, it is my opinion that state law governs and, therefore, a petition to amend or repeal a county home rule charter must be signed by qualified elect
Opinion 2011-L-12 — Mohall City Attorney
Dec 21, 2011
LETTER OPINION 2011-L-12 December 21, 2011 Mr. Marvin K. Madsen Mohall City Attorney PO Box 476 Mohall, ND 58761-0476 Dear Mr. Madsen: Thank you for your letter requesting my opinion on whether a city creates a debt obligation subject to state constitutional and statutory debt limitations by approving a general obligation pledge under N.D.C.C. § 23-11-24(23)(b) to additionally secure revenue bonds issued by its housing authority. For the reasons indicated below, it is my opinion that a city approving a general obligation pledge under N.D.C.C. § 23-11-24(23)(b) to additionally secure rev