Exposure · policy
15 public companies told the SEC they depend on Section 301.
If Section 301 is disrupted, these are the companies that said, in their own filings, it could hurt them — a deterministic read, every line cited. Some may be in your portfolio.
“In 2018, the United States imposed additional section 301 tariffs of up to 25%, on certain goods imported from China. These additional section 301 tariffs apply to our sourced products from China and have added additional cost to us.”
highSEC filing →
“operating results were unfavorably affected by tariffs implemented in 2025 which led to the Company incurring approximately $100 million of various tariff-related costs on inventory purchases.”
highSEC filing →
“since February 2025, under authority of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”), the U.S. government enacted an additional 10% to 35% “fentanyl-related” ad valorem tariffs on virtually all goods from China, Canada, and Mexico, with an exception for items qualifying for duty-free treatment under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (“USMCA”).”
highSEC filing →
“Substantially all of the Company's import operations are subject to customs requirements, trade restrictions and protection measures, and to tariffs, quotas and taxes on imports set by governments through mutual agreements, bilateral actions or, in some cases unilateral action, such as tariffs implemented by the U.S. government under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.”
highSEC filing →
“Currently, crystalline silicon solar cells are subject to 50% tariffs, and modules are subject to 25% tariffs.”
highSEC filing →
- ADT Inc.ADT
“In the past, the U.S. federal government imposed tariffs on certain alarm equipment components manufactured in China, and on other categories of electronic equipment manufactured in China that we install in our customers' premises, such as batteries and thermostats. Certain of these tariffs were as high as 25% and such tariffs increased our costs for such equipment as a result of some or all of such new tariffs being passed on to us by our suppliers.”
mediumSEC filing →
“In its original April 2025 notice, USTR had included the potential suspension of LNG export licenses as a remedy for non-compliance with the U.S. vessel restrictions; however, USTR subsequently removed the suspension language. In November 2025, the White House announced that, as part of the broader economic and trade relations deal with China, it had agreed to defer certain pending tariff and trade measures against China, including suspending for one year the implementation of fees on China-linked vessels pursuant to the Section 301 Investigation. However, the timeline for the U.S.-built vessel requirements for U.S. LNG exports thus far has not been modified.”
mediumSEC filing →
- Flex LNG Ltd.FLNG
“For example, in April 2025, the Office of the United States Trade Representative enacted vessel service fees under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 which were imposed as scheduled beginning on October 14, 2025”
lowSEC filing →
“The U.S. government imposed global tariffs on certain imported steel and aluminum products pursuant to Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as well as tariffs on imports of various Chinese product (including steel) pursuant to Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.”
lowSEC filing →
“a series of executive orders issued in March and April of 2025 have introduced or proposed significant changes to U.S. trade policy, including a baseline 10% tariff on a broad range of imported goods, unless replaced by higher country-specific rates.”
mediumSEC filing →
“The U.S. Government has also imposed, increased, or maintained Section 301 tariffs of 7.5%-100% on certain commodities from certain U.S. trading partners, most prominently China and Brazil.”
mediumSEC filing →
“In late 2025, the U.S. Trade Representative concluded following an additional Section 301 trade investigation that China engaged in unfair trade acts, policies, and practices with respect to the semiconductor industry, and therefore will implement an additional Section 301 tariff on Chinese semiconductors, in addition to the existing 50% Section 301 tariff, beginning on June 23, 2027.”
mediumSEC filing →
“At present, Section 301 tariffs are 50% on Chinese crystalline solar photovoltaic (“CSPV”) cells and modules, 25% on Chinese steel products, 25% on Chinese parts of lead-acid storage batteries (including separators thereof) and 25% on Chinese lithium-ion non-EV batteries.”
mediumSEC filing →
“The U.S. also maintains Section 301 tariffs on certain Chinese made lithium-ion batteries and related components utilized for energy storage systems, with such tariffs currently set at 25% effective January 1, 2026 (an increase from the previous rate of 7.5%).”
mediumSEC filing →
“If these anti-dumping duties and tariffs were to be revoked or reduced in the future, or if they do not adequately combat China's unfair trade practices, our results of operations and financial position could be adversely impacted.”
mediumSEC filing →