COST of Relocations Act
Sponsored By: Representative Subramanyam
Introduced
Summary
Mandatory benefit-cost analysis for large federal agency relocations. This bill would require agencies to conduct a benefit-cost analysis, following OMB Circular A-4 (as of Sept. 17, 2003), and to submit an unredacted report to the agency Inspector General before any covered relocation.
Show full summary
- Workers: Employees affected by a covered relocation (moves or redelegations involving more than the lesser of 5% or 100 employees outside the commuting area) would see required employee engagement plans and an assessment of how the move affects them and the people they serve.
- Agencies: Agencies would have to produce detailed analyses that quantify expected outcomes, list metrics, show staffing and funding needs, provide an implementation timeline, and include risk assessments and mission-impact reviews.
- Inspectors General and Congress: The agency Inspector General would review the unredacted analysis and must send a report to specified House and Senate committees within 90 days, including the data used, conclusions, and whether the agency followed Circular A-4.
- Public and stakeholders: The analysis would be published for the public with proprietary or confidential material removed and must list stakeholders and past and planned engagement timelines.
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
New checks before moving federal jobs
If enacted, agencies would face new steps before moving many federal jobs. A move would be covered when it shifts more than the lesser of 5% or 100 positions outside the commuting area, or under another agency. Before asking OMB or others to review, the agency would have to do a cost-benefit study using OMB Circular A-4 (from 2003) and send an unredacted report to its Inspector General. The report would need to spell out expected results, metrics, an employee plan, stakeholder input and timeline, staffing and budget needs, risks, and mission impacts. A public version would be posted without trade secrets or other confidential data. The IG would have 90 days to review and report to Congress; if jobs leave the National Capital Region, the IG would check local vs. destination real estate comparisons. These rules would add to, not replace, other relocation laws, and would take effect upon enactment.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Subramanyam
VA • D
Cosponsors
Beyer
VA • D
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Carson
IN • D
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Connolly
VA • D
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Elfreth
MD • D
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Evans (PA)
PA • D
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Garcia (CA)
CA • D
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Hoyer
MD • D
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Ivey
MD • D
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Lynch
MA • D
Sponsored 3/27/2025
McClain Delaney
MD • D
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]
DC • D
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Raskin
MD • D
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Scott (VA)
VA • D
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Titus
NV • D
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Tlaib
MI • D
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Vindman
VA • D
Sponsored 3/27/2025
McCollum
MN • D
Sponsored 3/31/2025
Pocan
WI • D
Sponsored 4/8/2025
Bishop
GA • D
Sponsored 8/5/2025
Walkinshaw
VA • D
Sponsored 9/18/2025
Cleaver
MO • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Barragan
CA • D
Sponsored 4/6/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govTake It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Start a Free Government Policy Watch to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.
Already have an account? Sign in