HR7223119th CongressWALLET

Language Access for All Act of 2026

Sponsored By: Representative Rep. Meng, Grace [D-NY-6]

Introduced

Summary

Meaningful access to federal programs for people with limited English proficiency would be required across federal agencies. The bill would set deadlines, technical standards, and enforcement so translated materials, interpreters, bilingual staff, and AI rules are in place to help LEP individuals use government services.

Show full summary
  • Families and LEP individuals would see translated vital documents, in-person and remote interpretation, sight translation, and multilingual notices and signage. Emergency communications during disasters and health crises would also need to be provided in appropriate languages.
  • Federal agencies and staff would have to make practical Language Access Plans with measurable performance indicators, run needs assessments, hold a 60-day Federal Register public comment period, and name a Language Access Coordinator within one year to oversee training and reporting.
  • Technology providers and agency tech teams would face limits on replacing humans with AI. Machine translations would need human verification, agencies must disclose AI limits and error rates, AI systems would be audited every two years, and noncompliance would be treated as discrimination under Title VI with DOJ enforcement options.

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

5 provisions identified: 5 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.

Agency language access plans

If enacted, each federal agency would have one year to write a practical language access plan. Plans would list LEP populations, say how agencies will provide translated vital documents, oral interpretation, sight translation, and multilingual digital content. Agencies would add language tracking to IT systems, publish a proposed plan for a 60-day Federal Register comment period, and send the final plan to the Attorney General and congressional leaders within 30 days. The Department of Justice would host the finished plans on a public site at LEP.gov.

Coordinators and interagency council

If enacted, each agency head would name a Language Access Coordinator to be the main contact and manage training and planning. Coordinators would push for annual training where feasible, decide each year which programs need language access, and review plans and costs three years after enactment. The General Services Administrator would convene an Interagency Language Access Standards Council and a working group led by the Attorney General to share best practices and give technical help. The working group would include one coordinator from each agency and meet with community groups and LEP stakeholders.

DOJ complaint system and enforcement

If enacted, the Attorney General would run a public complaint system for people who face language barriers with federal programs. Agencies named in complaints would have to respond within 60 days after the Attorney General forwards the complaint. Noncompliance could be treated as discrimination under Title VI, letting DOJ investigate and seek remedies or allowing private parties to pursue relief. DOJ would also publish a yearly report that breaks down complaints by agency, language, and program.

Government language technical standards

If enacted, the Attorney General, with NIST and stakeholders, would issue language access technical standards within one year. Standards would cover written, oral, digital, web, mobile, and AI-assisted communications and require annual agency certifications. Agencies would review and update the standards at least every three years. The rules would include an undue-burden waiver process that the Attorney General must decide within 30 days and that expires after two years.

Limits and checks on AI translation

If enacted, agencies could not fully replace qualified human translators with AI or machine translation. Any machine-assisted output would have to be verified by a qualified human translator or interpreter. Agencies would post annual disclosures on LEP.gov about AI tool data sources, limits, confidence levels, and error rates, follow Privacy Act and FISMA rules, test for discrimination, and fix user-reported errors. Inspectors General would audit agency AI language systems at least every two years and send reports to the Attorney General, and NIST would provide technical validation help.

Free Policy Watch

You just read the policy. Now see what it costs you.

Pick a topic. PRIA runs your household against live legislation and sends you a free personalized readout.

Pick a topic to get started

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

Rep. Meng, Grace [D-NY-6]

NY • D

Cosponsors

  • Rep. Chu, Judy [D-CA-28]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 1/22/2026

  • Rep. Goldman, Daniel S. [D-NY-10]

    NY • D

    Sponsored 1/22/2026

  • Rep. Vargas, Juan [D-CA-52]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 1/22/2026

  • Rep. Clarke, Yvette D. [D-NY-9]

    NY • D

    Sponsored 2/3/2026

  • Rep. Davis, Danny K. [D-IL-7]

    IL • D

    Sponsored 2/3/2026

  • Rep. Espaillat, Adriano [D-NY-13]

    NY • D

    Sponsored 2/3/2026

  • Rep. Gomez, Jimmy [D-CA-34]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 2/3/2026

  • Rep. Green, Al [D-TX-9]

    TX • D

    Sponsored 2/3/2026

  • Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]

    DC • D

    Sponsored 2/3/2026

  • Rep. Kamlager-Dove, Sydney [D-CA-37]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 2/3/2026

  • Rep. Lofgren, Zoe [D-CA-18]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 2/3/2026

  • Rep. Kennedy, Timothy M. [D-NY-26]

    NY • D

    Sponsored 2/3/2026

  • Rep. Krishnamoorthi, Raja [D-IL-8]

    IL • D

    Sponsored 2/3/2026

  • Rep. Mullin, Kevin [D-CA-15]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 2/3/2026

  • Simon

    CA • D

    Sponsored 2/3/2026

  • Rep. Thanedar, Shri [D-MI-13]

    MI • D

    Sponsored 2/3/2026

  • Rep. Tlaib, Rashida [D-MI-12]

    MI • D

    Sponsored 2/3/2026

  • Rep. Lieu, Ted [D-CA-36]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 2/4/2026

  • Rep. Barragan, Nanette Diaz [D-CA-44]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 2/4/2026

  • Rep. Hayes, Jahana [D-CT-5]

    CT • D

    Sponsored 2/10/2026

  • Vindman

    VA • D

    Sponsored 2/10/2026

  • Rep. Strickland, Marilyn [D-WA-10]

    WA • D

    Sponsored 2/10/2026

  • Rep. Tokuda, Jill N. [D-HI-2]

    HI • D

    Sponsored 2/10/2026

  • Rep. Correa, J. Luis [D-CA-46]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 2/12/2026

  • Rep. Bera, Ami [D-CA-6]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 2/12/2026

  • Rep. Carson, Andre [D-IN-7]

    IN • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2026

  • Fletcher

    TX • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2026

  • Rep. Case, Ed [D-HI-1]

    HI • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2026

  • Rep. Khanna, Ro [D-CA-17]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2026

Roll Call Votes

No roll call votes available for this bill.

View on Congress.gov

Live Policy Activity

Live

Surfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph — ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.

Live · 11h ago15,853Bills1,439Wiki4 signals surfaced
Now TrackingHR8495
Moving· 5 days in stage

Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act, 2027

Rep. Joyce, David P. [R-OH-14] (R-OH)
IntroducedApr 24
Cmte Reported
Passed Origin Chbr
Passed Second Chbr
Resolving Diffs
Enrolled
Became Law
Current StageIntroduced· 5d

Appropriations package that would fund Treasury and IRS while imposing rulemaking limits and detailed DC policy constraints, affecting taxpayers, community lenders, and DC residents.

How These Connect

· reasoned by PRIA's knowledge graph
Graph Connectionextracted100% confidence
Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act, 202740 U.S.C. § 6111 — Supreme Court Building

$207,039,000, of which $1,500,000 shall remain available until expended. In addition, there are appropriated such sums as may be necessary under current law for the salaries of the chief justice and associate justices of the court. care of the building and grounds For such expenditures as may be necessary to enable the Architect of the Capitol to carry out the duties imposed upon the Architect by 40 U.S.C. 6111 and 6112 under the direction of the Chief Justice, $18,093,000, to remain available until expended.

Graph Connectionextracted100% confidence
Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act, 20273 U.S.C. § 106 — Assistance and services for the Vice President

vernment, $8,000,000, to remain available until expended. Special Assistance to the President salaries and expenses For necessary expenses to enable the Vice President to provide assistance to the President in connection with specially assigned functions; services as authorized by 5 U.S.C. 3109 and 3 U.S.C. 106, including subsistence expenses as authorized by 3 U.S.C. 106, which shall be expended and accounted for as provided in that section; and hire of passenger motor vehicles, $6,015,000.

Back to Legislation

Take It Personal

Get Your Personalized Policy View

Take the PRIA Score to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.

Already have an account? Sign in