Wall Street Tweak: Default Rules for Bond Traders Updated
Published Date: 12/19/2025
Notice
Summary
The Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (FICC) updated its rules to make handling defaults and moving indirect participant accounts between intermediaries smoother and clearer. This change mainly affects financial firms using FICC’s Sponsored and Agent Clearing Services. The new rules kick in soon and aim to keep the system safer and more efficient without extra costs for participants.
Analyzed Economic Effects
9 provisions identified: 7 benefits, 1 costs, 1 mixed.
Agent Clearing Default Rules Added
FICC added default-management provisions to GSD Rule 8 to govern the default of an Agent Clearing Member. If FICC ceases to act for an Agent Clearing Member, FICC may close-out affected Agent Clearing Transactions, permit Executing Firm Customers to complete settlement, or port positions to a different Agent Clearing Member under proposed GSD Rule 26.
New Porting Rule for Indirect Activity
FICC adopted a new GSD Rule 26 that allows an Indirect Participant's activity and, where applicable, Segregated Customer Margin, to be transferred between Sponsoring Members or Agent Clearing Members in the normal course of business and following an intermediary default. Transfers submitted by the published deadline take effect by the close of business that day; later submissions take effect the next business day.
Executing Firm Customers Shielded From Loss Allocations
FICC expanded GSD Rule 8 to state that Executing Firm Customers shall not be obligated for allocations of loss or liability incurred by FICC under GSD Rule 4; any loss determined to arise from Agent Clearing Transactions is the responsibility of the Agent Clearing Member. This aligns the Agent Clearing Service with the Sponsored Service (except for Off-the-Market Transactions).
Netting of Agent Clearing Transactions Clarified
Proposed GSD Rule 8 and amendments to GSD Rule 22A permit FICC to net Agent Clearing Transactions of Executing Firm Customers recorded in the same Agent Clearing Member Omnibus Account for margin and close-out purposes, and permit FICC to net positions of Indirect Participants on an Indirect Participant-by-Indirect Participant (gross) basis where applicable.
FICC Offset Rights Against Proprietary Accounts
Proposed GSD Rule 8, Section 5(f), gives FICC the right to offset obligations an Agent Clearing Member owes with respect to Executing Firm Customers against obligations FICC owes to the Agent Clearing Member in respect of the member's Proprietary Accounts.
Use of Proprietary Gains to Offset Indirect Losses
FICC proposes to expand its ability to use gains realized from closing-out a Defaulting Member's Proprietary Transactions to offset losses associated with the close-out of Indirect Participant activity under GSD Rule 22A. FICC also clarified that it will include costs and fees incurred when determining any resulting loss or liability.
Indirect Participant Claims Not Netted Against Intermediary
In a Corporation Default under proposed GSD Rule 22B, FICC clarified that Indirect Participant claims would not be netted against amounts owed by their Sponsoring Member or Agent Clearing Member. Activity in Sponsoring Member Omnibus Accounts and Segregated Indirect Participant Accounts would be netted on an Indirect Participant-by-Indirect Participant (gross) basis.
Conditions for Porting in Normal Course
Under proposed GSD Rule 26, porting in the normal course requires that the Indirect Participant complete onboarding with the Receiving Member, the trades be novated but not yet included in a Net Settlement Position, and both Sending and Receiving Members submit and accept the required trade data. FICC will maintain its lien on the Sending Member's Clearing Fund and any Segregated Customer Margin until the Receiving Member satisfies margin requirements.
New Liquidation Mechanisms Codified
Amendment No. 1 adds two explicit liquidation options for Sponsoring Members and Agent Clearing Members: (1) an Offsetting Transaction Mechanism where the intermediary submits an offsetting trade to liquidate a net position, and (2) a Transfer Mechanism where the intermediary instructs FICC to transfer a Net Settlement Position into the intermediary's Proprietary Account, making it proprietary.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-20466, Adviser and Regulated Fund Custody Rules; Crypto Custody Rules
The SEC is updating rules for how investment advisers and funds handle crypto assets, making sure they keep these digital investments safe and properly reported. These changes affect advisers, funds, and anyone managing crypto securities, aiming to modernize rules and improve transparency. Comments on the proposal are open until December 7, 2026, so get ready to weigh in!
2026-19260, Rescission of Rule 14a-8's Federal Regulation of Shareholder Proposals and Amendments to Rule 14a-4
The SEC wants to stop its federal rule that controls how shareholders can make proposals at company meetings, letting state laws and company rules take over instead. They’re also changing rules so companies can sometimes vote on proposals not in their official materials—but shareholders can opt out if they want. This affects investors and companies, with comments open until November 20, 2026, and could shake up how shareholder voices are heard and counted.
2026-18424, Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") is proposing to rescind the political contribution rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), which prohibits investment advisers from providing investment advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after an adviser or any covered associate of the adviser makes a contribution to certain categories of elected officials or candidates, among other prohibitions. In the more than fifteen years since the rule was adopted, implementation challenges associated with the political contribution rule have resulted in a range of significant unintended consequences, including compliance practices among some investment advisers that may have had the effect of restricting all political contributions by the investment advisers and their employees. Market participants also have stated that the political contribution rule is burdensome, complex, and both lacks clarity and creates a de facto strict liability standard. The Commission is of the view that other existing requirements of the Advisers Act and its associated rules, including prohibitions on fraud, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule, and the code of ethics rule (defined below), are likely sufficient to address pay-to-play practices while allowing an adviser the flexibility to implement an approach that is more appropriately tailored to its particular risks, rendering the political contribution rule unnecessary. The Commission also is proposing to amend the rule under the Advisers Act pertaining to books and records consistent with the proposed rescission.
2026-18190, Transfer Agent Rules
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") is proposing to adopt new rules, amend existing rules, amend the existing form for registration with the Commission as a transfer agent (Form TA-1) and the existing form for reporting activities of transfer agents (Form TA-2), and rescind an existing rule governing registered transfer agents. The proposals are designed to modernize the rules governing registered transfer agents.
2026-17183, Regulation Crypto Assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") is proposing new rules to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposed offering regime is intended to facilitate capital formation and accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. The proposed rules would be set forth in a new regulation titled "Regulation Crypto Assets" and would include two exemptions from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. The first exemption would permit offerings of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Under both exemptions, issuers would be required to make certain principles-based narrative disclosures available to their investors. In addition, issuers under the second exemption would be required to provide financial statements and would be subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Issuers that rely on these exemptions would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules also would include a conditional safe harbor from the term "investment contract" in the definitions of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If the conditions of that proposed safe harbor are satisfied, then a crypto asset would be deemed not to be subject to an investment contract for purposes of those definitions of "security."
2026-12163, The Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
The SEC wants to scrap some old rules that stop stocks from being traded at worse prices and prevent confusing market quotes. This change affects stock traders and exchanges, aiming to simplify trading and possibly speed things up. If you want to share your thoughts, you’ve got until August 17, 2026, so don’t miss out!
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2025-23332, Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Modify the Handling of Incoming Post Only Orders
Investors Exchange LLC (IEX) is changing how it handles Post Only orders that might lock or cross prices from other markets. This update helps make trading smoother and fairer for investors using IEX, starting right away with no extra fees. Traders and market participants should watch for these changes to keep their orders working just right.
Next: 2025-23334, Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust Shares To Trade Under NYSE Arca Rule 8.201-E (Generic) Commodity-Based Trust Shares
NYSE Arca is switching how the Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust shares are traded, moving them from a special rule to a more general one. This change affects investors who buy or sell these Bitcoin trust shares and aims to simplify trading without impacting costs or timing. The update took effect right after filing on December 3, 2025, so the market can roll with the new setup immediately.