2026-13546Proposed RuleWallet

FAA Moves to Override State Crew Rest and Meal Laws

Published Date: 7/6/2026

Proposed Rule

Summary

The FAA wants to make sure airline crew rest and work rules always come first, no matter what state or local laws say about meal and break times. This change affects airlines and their workers by clearing up confusion and keeping flights safe and on schedule. Comments are open until September 4, 2026, so get ready to weigh in!

Analyzed Economic Effects

5 provisions identified: 4 benefits, 1 costs, 0 mixed.

Keeps flight attendants available for emergencies

FAA says the rule clarifies that flight attendants and flightcrew must remain available during duty periods (including during flight) so they can respond immediately to emergencies such as evacuations, medical incidents, unruly passengers, and lithium-battery fires. FAA emphasizes safety reasons for preempting state "off-duty" break mandates.

Federal rules trump state break laws

FAA proposes adding Sec. 117.31 and Sec. 121.468 to make federal duty and rest rules for pilots and flight attendants the only rules that apply. This would preempt State and local meal and rest break laws so flightcrew members and flight attendants are governed by 14 CFR part 117 and 14 CFR part 121 instead of state break laws.

Airlines avoid patchwork of state rules

FAA says the proposed rule would prevent airlines from having to comply with differing State and local meal and rest break laws. FAA expects airlines to avoid costs like hiring extra crew, reserving passenger seats for relief crew, and operational disruption that could result from complying with multiple state rules.

Avoided higher ticket prices and route cuts

FAA says State meal and rest break laws, if applied, would force airlines to add crew and block seats, raising labor and operational costs that would be passed to passengers as "significantly higher ticket prices" and could make low-margin regional routes economically unviable. The proposed preemption is intended to prevent those effects.

FAA: No significant small-entity costs

FAA states under the Regulatory Flexibility Act that the proposed rule "does not impose costs on any entities, including small entities" and certifies it would not result in a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. FAA solicits comments on that determination.

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this regulation affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this federal register document and every other regulation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Key Dates

Published Date
Comments Due
7/6/2026
9/4/2026

Department and Agencies

Department
Independent Agency
Agency
Transportation Department
Federal Aviation Administration
Source: View HTML

Related Federal Register Documents

Previous / Next Documents

Back to Federal Register