All Roll Calls
Yes: 429 • No: 417
Sponsored By: Representative Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5]
Passed House
This bill would impose new accountability and transparency rules for court-appointed monitors. It would cap fees, limit terms, require public notice and comment, and force annual public accountings and judge transfers for long-running monitors.
Personalized for You
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
2 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.
This bill would set timing rules for long‑running monitorships. If a monitorship has already lasted 6 years when this bill is enacted, a new monitor would be appointed within 180 days, and the case would move to another judge within 1 year after enactment. Going forward, if a monitorship is still in place 6 years after the court’s order, the case would transfer to another judge in the same district on that 6‑year date.
This bill would set new rules for court‑appointed monitors of state or local governments. Courts would have to post a proposed monitor’s name and let the public comment before any appointment. A person would be limited to one monitorship at a time, for no longer than 5 years, with no reappointment under the same order. A successor could not work for the same employer as the prior monitor. If anyone seeks to change a monitorship, the court would hold a hearing and could change only items not yet in substantial and sustained compliance. The Judicial Conference of the United States would set maximum hourly rates, and monitors would be allowed to use pro bono time or reduced rates. Each year, monitors would file a public accounting of services, fees, and any pro bono or reduced‑rate work. These appointment and fee rules would take effect within 180 days after this section takes effect.
Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5]
AZ • R
Rep. Fry, Russell [R-SC-7]
SC • R
Sponsored 4/20/2026
Rep. Nehls, Troy E. [R-TX-22]
TX • R
Sponsored 4/20/2026
All Roll Calls
Yes: 429 • No: 417
house vote • 5/14/2026
On Motion to Recommit
Yes: 210 • No: 213
house vote • 5/14/2026
On Passage
Yes: 219 • No: 204
119-hr-2395, SHORT Act
Reclassifies short‑barreled rifles and shotguns under federal law and limits state oversight. The SHORT Act would change the Internal Revenue Code and Title 18 to treat certain short‑barreled weapons differently, create a federal safe harbor for people who comply with Chapter 44, preempt state taxes and registration rules, and require destruction of some National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record entries. - Owners who follow federal Chapter 44 rules would be regarded as meeting any state or local registration or licensing requirement for short‑barreled rifles and shotguns. - States and localities would be barred from imposing taxes other than general sales or use taxes, or from requiring markings, recordkeeping, or registration for short‑barreled rifles and shotguns that affect interstate commerce. - The Attorney General would have to destroy within 365 days certain NFRTR registrations and transfer and maker applications that identify owners or makers of those weapons.
119-hr-21, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
Mandates care and penalties for infants born alive after an abortion. This bill would set standards of care, require reporting, create criminal penalties, and allow civil suits when an infant is born alive following an abortion. - Women and families: A woman on whom an abortion is performed may sue anyone who violates the law and recover objectively verifiable medical and psychological damages, punitive damages, and statutory damages equal to three times the cost of the abortion. Courts must award reasonable attorney's fees to prevailing plaintiffs and may award fees to defendants if a suit is frivolous. - Health care practitioners and facility employees: Any practitioner present at a birth resulting from an abortion must exercise the same professional skill, care, and diligence as for any other live-born infant of the same gestational age. Practitioners or employees who know of a failure to comply must immediately report the violation to appropriate State or Federal law enforcement. - Criminal and statutory consequences: Violators face fines, up to 5 years in prison, or both, and anyone who intentionally kills a born-alive infant is punished under the murder statute. The bill also updates chapter headings and adds statutory definitions for "abortion" and "attempt."
119-hr-1181, Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act
Stops payment systems from assigning merchant codes that single out firearms sellers. The bill would bar payment card networks and covered entities from requiring or assigning merchant category codes that identify retailers as selling firearms, ammunition, accessories, or components. - Firearms retailers — would not be assigned MCCs used only or primarily for firearms sellers, removing a discrete code that labels their transactions. - Consumers — purchases at firearms retailers would be less likely to be automatically tagged by payment codes as firearm-related, limiting that avenue for transaction classification. - Payment card networks and covered entities — would be prohibited from requiring or assigning firearms-specific MCCs and must follow the new restrictions. - Enforcement and oversight — the Attorney General must create a complaints process within 90 days, require remedies within 30 days of notice, may seek federal injunctions for unresolved violations, and must report to Congress annually. The bill creates no private right of action. - Federal preemption — it would preempt state and local laws regulating these specific MCC practices while allowing compliance with laws on fraud, dispute processing, and transaction integrity.
119-hr-987, Fair Access to Banking Act
Prevents banks and payment networks from cutting off customers for political or reputational reasons. It sets a national standard that forces objective, risk-based decisions and creates a private right of action for people and businesses harmed by unfair denials. - Families and households keep access to bank accounts and payment services without being excluded for politics or reputation, and any denial must include a written, quantifiable justification. - Lawful businesses and nonprofits, including politically unpopular ones, gain protection from category-based refusals and can sue for treble damages and attorney’s fees if a covered institution violates the rules. - Banks, credit unions, and payment networks must adopt impartial, data-driven risk standards, may face civil penalties, and large institutions that refuse service could lose access to discount window lending or automated clearing house services.
119-hr-116, Stopping Border Surges Act
Tightens asylum eligibility and overhauls rules for unaccompanied children and family detention. The bill would narrow who can get asylum, shorten filing windows, mandate recordings and checklists for credible-fear and expedited-removal interviews, and expand DHS authority over detention and adjudication. - Children and families: Requires specialized interviews for unaccompanied alien children and provides access to counsel at no expense to the Government. It would impose a 14-day hearing timeline for qualifying cases, require certain placement and caretaker contact information be disclosed, and mandate that specified child information be given to DHS within 90 days of enactment. It also narrows Special Immigrant Juvenile Status eligibility and clarifies that non-UAC minors may be detained only to a parent or legal guardian lawfully present. - Asylum applicants and process: Lowers the asylum filing deadline from 1 year to 6 months. It would anchor credible-fear screenings to asylum eligibility rules, require audio or audiovisual recordings and competent interpreters, and change work-authorization timing from 180 days to 1 year with any issued employment authorization expiring 6 months after issuance. It also allows asylum termination if an asylee returns to their home country subject to a waiver for compelling reasons. - Enforcement, fraud, and adjudication: Expands safe-third-country and internal-relocation bars, requires consideration of investigative work product in credibility determinations, and reallocates some asylum adjudicatory authority between DHS and the Attorney General. It adds a criminal penalty of up to 10 years for knowingly fraudulent asylum statements and creates a discovery-based 10-year statute of limitations for certain immigration fraud offenses.
119-hr-7651, Chloe Cole Act of 2026
Creates a federal private right of action letting children and their parents or guardians sue health providers over puberty‑delaying or sex‑altering medical interventions. It would apply to care that uses puberty blockers, cross‑sex hormones, or surgeries intended to delay, disrupt, or change development that corresponds to the individual's sex, and it applies under a strict‑liability standard for provider participation. - Families and children could bring civil lawsuits against licensed health professionals, hospitals, and clinics for prescribing, administering, authorizing, supervising, planning, or performing covered interventions. These claims cover puberty blockers, sex hormones, and surgeries aimed at changing external sex characteristics. - Health care professionals and institutions would face liability even without proof of intent when they participate in covered interventions. "Participation" explicitly includes prescribing, administering, performing procedures, and coordinating or authorizing care. - The measure carves out medical treatment for verifiable disorders of sexual development, care for infections or injuries caused by a covered intervention, and interventions tied to major organ or life‑threatening conditions. It also defines "detransition treatment" and defines sex as an immutable biological classification at conception, which affects how the law is applied.
Surfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph, ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.
Would block federal eminent domain for most agricultural land when a feasible alternative exists, defines covered land, and excludes tiny low‑income parcels.
- 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. — Communications Act of 1934: establishes the FCC and its jurisdiction over interstate and foreign communications by wire and radio; the foundational statute for all FCC regu
The Federal Communications Commission — an independent regulatory agency created by the Communications Act of 1934 47 U.S.C. § 151 and substantially restructured by the Telecommunications Act of 1996
The U.S. Department of Labor is revising its implementing regulations for Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (Section 503). The revisions align the regulations with applicable law and recent executive orders, including Executive Order 14173, "Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity," and Executive Order 14219, "Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's `Department of Government Efficiency' Deregulatory Initiative."
“Bill HR10135 contains provision HR10135::prov_1”
The War Powers Resolution 1973 — enacted over President Nixon's veto and codified at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1541–1548 — is Congress's primary statutory attempt to limit the President's ability to commit U.S. fo