HJRES139119th CongressWALLET

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States requiring a balanced budget for the Federal Government.

Sponsored By: Representative Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5]

Failed

Summary

This proposed constitutional amendment would require that federal spending not exceed the average annual receipts from the prior three years, adjusted for changes in population and inflation. It sets rules for what counts as receipts and expenditures and creates high voting thresholds for tax increases and exceptions to the cap.

Show full summary
  • Households and program recipients: Total federal expenditures would be limited to a cap based on the three prior years' average receipts, adjusted for population and inflation. The cap would exclude payments on the national debt and would count all other federal spending toward the limit.
  • Congress and lawmaking: Congress could allow specific spending above the cap only by a recorded two-thirds vote in each House. That two-thirds override also applies for years when a declaration of war is in effect.
  • Taxes and timing: Any new tax or tax rate increase would need approval by two-thirds of each House to become law. The amendment would take effect beginning in the fifth year after ratification.

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

1 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.

Limits on federal spending and taxes

Had it passed, the amendment would have required that total federal spending in any year not exceed the average annual receipts from the three prior years, adjusted for changes in the citizen population and for inflation. Debt payments would not have counted as spending and borrowing proceeds would not have counted as receipts. Congress could have approved specific spending above the cap only by a two‑thirds roll call vote in each House, while a declared war year could allow excess spending by a roll call vote. Any bill creating a new tax or raising a tax rate would not have become law unless two‑thirds of each House approved it by roll call. The article would have taken effect in the fifth year after ratification and it would have required Congress to pass laws to enforce and implement the rules.

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5]

AZ • R

Cosponsors

  • Rep. Clyde, Andrew S. [R-GA-9]

    GA • R

    Sponsored 1/12/2026

  • Brecheen

    OK • R

    Sponsored 1/13/2026

Roll Call Votes

All Roll Calls

Yes: 211 • No: 207

house vote • 3/18/2026

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass

Yes: 211 • No: 207

View on Congress.gov
Back to Legislation