HR8365119th Congress

Monitor Accountability Act

Sponsored By: Representative Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5]

Passed House

Summary

Sets national limits and rules for court-appointed monitors. This bill would cap fees, limit terms, require public notice and accounting, and set rules for judge transfers and reappointments of monitors who oversee state or local governments.

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

3 provisions identified: 2 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.

Caps and public reports on monitor fees

If enacted, an Administrator would set maximum fee rates for court‑appointed monitors. Monitors would not be allowed to charge above those caps. They would be allowed to work pro bono or at reduced rates. Each year, monitors would send the court an accounting of services, fees, and whether any work was pro bono or reduced rate. The court would make these accountings public.

Time limits and hearings for monitorships

When a monitorship reaches 6 years and is still in effect, the case would be transferred to a different judge in the same district. For monitorships already in effect for 6 years when enacted, the court would appoint a new monitor within 180 days of enactment and transfer the case within 1 year of enactment. If anyone seeks to change the monitorship, the court would hold a hearing. The court would only change parts where the monitored party has not shown substantial and sustained compliance.

Tighter rules to appoint court monitors

Within 180 days, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts would issue rules for appointing monitors. A person would not be allowed to serve on more than one monitorship at a time. Each appointment would be limited to 5 years, with no reappointment under the same court order. If a new monitor is named after a term expires under the same order, that person would not be employed by the same employer as the prior monitor. Before any appointment, the court would give public notice and allow public comment.

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5]

AZ • R

Cosponsors

  • Rep. Fry, Russell [R-SC-7]

    SC • R

    Sponsored 4/20/2026

  • Nehls

    TX • R

    Sponsored 4/20/2026

Roll Call Votes

All Roll Calls

Yes: 429 • No: 417

house vote • 5/14/2026

On Motion to Recommit

Yes: 210 • No: 213

house vote • 5/14/2026

On Passage

Yes: 219 • No: 204

View on Congress.gov
Back to Legislation