All Roll Calls
Yes: 429 • No: 417
Sponsored By: Representative Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5]
Passed House
Sets national limits and rules for court-appointed monitors. This bill would cap fees, limit terms, require public notice and accounting, and set rules for judge transfers and reappointments of monitors who oversee state or local governments.
Personalized for You
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
3 provisions identified: 2 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.
If enacted, an Administrator would set maximum fee rates for court‑appointed monitors. Monitors would not be allowed to charge above those caps. They would be allowed to work pro bono or at reduced rates. Each year, monitors would send the court an accounting of services, fees, and whether any work was pro bono or reduced rate. The court would make these accountings public.
When a monitorship reaches 6 years and is still in effect, the case would be transferred to a different judge in the same district. For monitorships already in effect for 6 years when enacted, the court would appoint a new monitor within 180 days of enactment and transfer the case within 1 year of enactment. If anyone seeks to change the monitorship, the court would hold a hearing. The court would only change parts where the monitored party has not shown substantial and sustained compliance.
Within 180 days, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts would issue rules for appointing monitors. A person would not be allowed to serve on more than one monitorship at a time. Each appointment would be limited to 5 years, with no reappointment under the same court order. If a new monitor is named after a term expires under the same order, that person would not be employed by the same employer as the prior monitor. Before any appointment, the court would give public notice and allow public comment.
Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5]
AZ • R
Rep. Fry, Russell [R-SC-7]
SC • R
Sponsored 4/20/2026
Nehls
TX • R
Sponsored 4/20/2026
All Roll Calls
Yes: 429 • No: 417
house vote • 5/14/2026
On Motion to Recommit
Yes: 210 • No: 213
house vote • 5/14/2026
On Passage
Yes: 219 • No: 204
HR2395 — SHORT Act
Reclassifies short‑barreled rifles and shotguns under federal law and limits state oversight. The SHORT Act would change the Internal Revenue Code and Title 18 to treat certain short‑barreled weapons differently, create a federal safe harbor for people who comply with Chapter 44, preempt state taxes and registration rules, and require destruction of some National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record entries. - Owners who follow federal Chapter 44 rules would be regarded as meeting any state or local registration or licensing requirement for short‑barreled rifles and shotguns. - States and localities would be barred from imposing taxes other than general sales or use taxes, or from requiring markings, recordkeeping, or registration for short‑barreled rifles and shotguns that affect interstate commerce. - The Attorney General would have to destroy within 365 days certain NFRTR registrations and transfer and maker applications that identify owners or makers of those weapons.
HR21 — Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
Mandates care and penalties for infants born alive after an abortion. This bill would set standards of care, require reporting, create criminal penalties, and allow civil suits when an infant is born alive following an abortion. - Women and families: A woman on whom an abortion is performed may sue anyone who violates the law and recover objectively verifiable medical and psychological damages, punitive damages, and statutory damages equal to three times the cost of the abortion. Courts must award reasonable attorney's fees to prevailing plaintiffs and may award fees to defendants if a suit is frivolous. - Health care practitioners and facility employees: Any practitioner present at a birth resulting from an abortion must exercise the same professional skill, care, and diligence as for any other live-born infant of the same gestational age. Practitioners or employees who know of a failure to comply must immediately report the violation to appropriate State or Federal law enforcement. - Criminal and statutory consequences: Violators face fines, up to 5 years in prison, or both, and anyone who intentionally kills a born-alive infant is punished under the murder statute. The bill also updates chapter headings and adds statutory definitions for "abortion" and "attempt."
HR116 — Stopping Border Surges Act
Tightens asylum eligibility and overhauls rules for unaccompanied children and family detention. The bill would narrow who can get asylum, shorten filing windows, mandate recordings and checklists for credible-fear and expedited-removal interviews, and expand DHS authority over detention and adjudication. - Children and families: Requires specialized interviews for unaccompanied alien children and provides access to counsel at no expense to the Government. It would impose a 14-day hearing timeline for qualifying cases, require certain placement and caretaker contact information be disclosed, and mandate that specified child information be given to DHS within 90 days of enactment. It also narrows Special Immigrant Juvenile Status eligibility and clarifies that non-UAC minors may be detained only to a parent or legal guardian lawfully present. - Asylum applicants and process: Lowers the asylum filing deadline from 1 year to 6 months. It would anchor credible-fear screenings to asylum eligibility rules, require audio or audiovisual recordings and competent interpreters, and change work-authorization timing from 180 days to 1 year with any issued employment authorization expiring 6 months after issuance. It also allows asylum termination if an asylee returns to their home country subject to a waiver for compelling reasons. - Enforcement, fraud, and adjudication: Expands safe-third-country and internal-relocation bars, requires consideration of investigative work product in credibility determinations, and reallocates some asylum adjudicatory authority between DHS and the Attorney General. It adds a criminal penalty of up to 10 years for knowingly fraudulent asylum statements and creates a discovery-based 10-year statute of limitations for certain immigration fraud offenses.
HR2189 — Law-Enforcement Innovate to De-Escalate Act
Creates a federal definition and tax framework for less-than-lethal projectile devices. It sets rules to classify these tools, requires agency decisions within 90 days on submitted devices, and opens tax and regulatory exemptions. - Law enforcement: Gives agencies a clear statutory category for de-escalation tools and a path to modernize equipment. The Attorney General must decide whether a submitted device fits the definition within 90 days. - Manufacturers and owners: Adds tax exemptions for qualifying less-than-lethal devices and their shells or cartridges under Section 4182. It also broadens National Firearms Act exemptions to cover these devices and applies to articles sold after enactment. - Transparency and oversight: Requires the Treasury Secretary to publish an annual public list of covered devices and a separate list for devices whose projectiles exceed 500 feet per second. Both lists must be updated yearly and reported to the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee.
HR1181 — Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act
Blocks payment networks from assigning merchant codes that single out gun sellers. This bill would stop payment card networks and other covered entities from requiring or assigning merchant category codes that identify a retailer as selling firearms, ammunition, accessories, or components. - Firearms retailers would not be forced to use MCCs used only or primarily for firearms sellers. They and other individuals could submit complaints to the Attorney General. - Payment card networks and covered entities would be banned from requiring or assigning such firearms-specific MCCs. If the Attorney General finds a violation the network would be ordered to fix it within 30 days and could face a federal lawsuit if it does not comply. - State and local laws that regulate or require MCCs used only or primarily for firearms retailers would be preempted. - The Attorney General would establish a complaint process within 90 days and must send Congress an annual report summarizing investigations and any available data on the law's effectiveness.
HR925 — Dismantle DEI Act of 2025
Bans many federal Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) practices across the federal government. The bill would define a narrow set of "prohibited DEI practices," require agencies to end DEI offices and related programs, and block similar DEI requirements for contractors, grantees, accrediting bodies, and parts of the military and financial regulators.
Surfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph — ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.
The federal government runs two closely related conservation-workforce pipelines on public lands: the Youth Conservation Corps YCC and the Public Lands Corps PLC. YCC is a summer employment program fo
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 1952 — the "Steel Seizure Case" — is the Supreme Court's foundational decision defining the limits of presidential power, and the source of the most
The Uruguay Round Agreements Act URAA of 1994 19 U.S.C. §§ 3501–3624 implemented U.S. membership in the World Trade Organization WTO and incorporated the Uruguay Round trade agreements — the broadest
- WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding DSU, Annex 2 to the WTO Agreement — Establishes the WTO dispute settlement system: consultations, panel proceedings, Appellate Body review, adoption of reports,