S3020119th CongressWALLET

Judicial Efficiency Improvement Act

Sponsored By: Senator Dan Sullivan

Introduced

Summary

Splits the current Ninth Circuit and creates a new Twelfth Circuit. This bill would redraw appellate lines, reassign judges by duty station, and phase in dozens of new district judges to relieve caseload pressure.

Show full summary
  • Residents and litigants in affected states and territories would see appeals move to different circuits. The new Ninth Circuit would cover California, Guam, Hawaii, and the Northern Mariana Islands. The Twelfth Circuit would cover Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington. Court locations would include Honolulu, Pasadena, and San Francisco for the Ninth and Las Vegas, Phoenix, Portland, and Seattle for the Twelfth.
  • Judges would be reassigned based on their official duty stations. Senior judges could elect which of the two new circuits to join. The President could appoint two additional circuit judges with duty stations in California for the new Ninth.
  • Pending filings would be handled by the court that would have received them if the split had already happened. Cases already submitted would proceed under the original court process.
  • The bill starts a phased, multi‑year expansion of district judgeships from 2025 through 2035, beginning with 11 new district judges in 2025 across high‑volume districts including multiple California and New York districts.
  • It creates three temporary district judgeships in Oklahoma with nonpermanent tenure rules and sets the Twelfth Circuit headquarters in Seattle. The bill also authorizes temporary inter‑circuit assignments to let judges sit in the other circuit when needed.

*It authorizes appropriations to implement the changes and establishes a funding schedule for the temporary Oklahoma judgeships that starts at about $13.0 million for FY2025–26, rises to about $23.2 million for FY2027–28 and reaches about $61.1 million annually from FY2035, with future amounts adjusted by the Consumer Price Index.*

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

3 provisions identified: 2 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.

New district judges through 2035

If enacted, the bill would add many new federal district judges between 2025 and 2035. Eleven judges would begin in 2025 when the law is signed. Further tranches of judges would take effect on January 21 of later years (2027, 2029, 2031, 2033, and 2035). The new judges are spread across many districts, including several in California, New York, Texas, Florida, Arizona, and others. The President would appoint them with Senate approval, and the law would update statutory judge-count tables.

Split Ninth Circuit and Reassign Judges

If enacted, this bill would split the current Ninth Circuit into two circuits. The new Ninth would cover California, Guam, Hawaii, and the Northern Mariana Islands. The new Twelfth would cover Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington. It would set Ninth Circuit judges at 18 and create a Twelfth with 13 judges. The President could immediately appoint two extra Ninth Circuit judges based in California when the law is signed. Active judges would be reassigned by their duty station, and senior judges could choose which circuit to join. Cases already submitted for decision would continue unchanged. Most of these changes would start one year after enactment, and administrative wrap-up would end two years after enactment.

Money to pay for court changes

If enacted, the bill would authorize Congress to appropriate whatever sums are necessary to carry out the court reorganization. That includes money for new court facilities. The bill does not set dollar amounts. Any spending would still require later appropriations acts.

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

Dan Sullivan

AK • R

Cosponsors

  • Sen. Crapo, Mike [R-ID]

    ID • R

    Sponsored 10/21/2025

  • Sen. Daines, Steve [R-MT]

    MT • R

    Sponsored 10/21/2025

  • Sen. Murkowski, Lisa [R-AK]

    AK • R

    Sponsored 10/21/2025

  • Sen. Risch, James E. [R-ID]

    ID • R

    Sponsored 10/21/2025

  • Sen. Sheehy, Tim [R-MT]

    MT • R

    Sponsored 10/21/2025

Roll Call Votes

No roll call votes available for this bill.

View on Congress.gov
Back to Legislation