Workplace Violence Prevention for Health Care and Social Service Workers Act
Sponsored By: Senator Tammy Baldwin
Introduced
Summary
Prevent workplace violence against health care and social service workers. The bill would require a federal OSHA workplace-violence prevention standard that forces covered employers to build facility-specific prevention plans, run training, keep incident logs, and report violence data to the Department of Labor and Congress.
Show full summary
- Health care and social service workers would get required annual training, anti-retaliation protections for reporting incidents, access to plan records, and meaningful participation in creating and updating prevention plans.
- Covered employers would have to develop, implement, and maintain a written workplace violence prevention plan for each facility within 6 months of the interim standard. They would also conduct prompt incident investigations, prepare annual summaries, and keep plan and incident records for 5 years.
- The rule would apply broadly to hospitals, nursing homes, community clinics, psychiatric and substance use treatment centers, home health and emergency transport services, correctional facility clinics, and other sites the Secretary designates. It would also extend the standard to Medicare-funded hospitals and skilled nursing facilities that fall outside traditional OSHA coverage.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
7 provisions identified: 7 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
Medicare providers must follow standard
If enacted, the bill would require hospitals and skilled nursing facilities that are not covered by OSHA to comply with the workplace violence prevention standard. The rule would apply to Medicare‑participating providers and noncompliance could trigger Medicare enforcement actions. This Medicare requirement would begin one year after the interim standard is issued. The change would extend enforceable protections to facilities that previously fell outside OSHA coverage.
Employers must have violence plans
If enacted, the bill would require each covered employer to adopt a written workplace violence prevention plan for each facility or service within 6 months after the interim standard. Plans would be tailored to local hazards and made with meaningful input from direct care employees. Plans would name a responsible person, require risk assessments and hazard controls, set reporting and investigation procedures, include emergency response steps, and require timely correction of hazards.
Which workers and services are covered
If enacted, the bill would define which facilities, services, employers, and workers are covered. Covered facilities would include hospitals, nursing homes, hospices, psychiatric and substance use treatment centers, freestanding emergency centers, correctional medical clinics, and other Secretary-designated sites. Covered services would include home health, home hospice, emergency services and transport, and some Federal services, while child day care would be excluded. Covered employers would include contractors and temporary staffing firms, but not private household employers who hire a caregiver for a family.
Workplace violence rule timeline
If enacted, the bill would require the Labor Secretary to issue an interim workplace violence standard within 1 year. The interim standard would take effect within 30 days of issuance and may phase in engineering controls. A proposed rule would be due within 2 years and a final rule within 42 months. The Secretary could give up to 1 year of technical help to employers. If no interim standard appears in 1 year, the bill's rules would operate and be enforced like an OSHA section 6(b) standard until an IFS is issued.
Employees keep existing rights
If enacted, the bill would make clear it does not remove other legal rights for workers. Rights under the title would be in addition to Federal, State, or union protections. Workers could still report violent incidents to police. The bill would not limit protections for domestic violence, stalking, dating violence, or sexual assault.
Incident logs and record access
If enacted, the bill would require employers to keep a violent incident log for each facility and service and to retain plan and investigation records for at least 5 years. The Secretary would provide a log template within 1 year of the interim standard. Employers would update the log within 7 days of an incident and let employees and their representatives examine and copy records consistent with privacy rules. Copies must omit identifying information about alleged perpetrators.
Required training for workers and supervisors
If enacted, the bill would require employers to train covered employees about the prevention plan, hazards, controls, reporting, response, and anti‑retaliation rights. New employees would get training before they start their job. Supervisors would get additional hazard‑recognition training. Training must be in person in the first year and fit employees' language and literacy needs; later annual training may use live video only if in‑person is impracticable.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Tammy Baldwin
WI • D
Cosponsors
Edward Markey
MA • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Timothy Kaine
VA • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Jeanne Shaheen
NH • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Sen. Luján, Ben Ray [D-NM]
NM • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Amy Klobuchar
MN • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Alex Padilla
CA • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Tina Smith
MN • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Richard Blumenthal
CT • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Patty Murray
WA • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Bernie Sanders
VT • I
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Elissa Slotkin
MI • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Elizabeth Warren
MA • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Catherine Cortez Masto
NV • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Jeff Merkley
OR • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
John Reed
RI • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
John Hickenlooper
CO • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Tammy Duckworth
IL • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Christopher Coons
DE • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Chris Van Hollen
MD • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Martin Heinrich
NM • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Michael Bennet
CO • D
Sponsored 4/28/2025
Kirsten Gillibrand
NY • D
Sponsored 4/30/2025
Brian Schatz
HI • D
Sponsored 5/7/2025
Raphael Warnock
GA • D
Sponsored 6/3/2025
Richard Durbin
IL • D
Sponsored 6/11/2025
John Fetterman
PA • D
Sponsored 7/9/2025
Angela Alsobrooks
MD • D
Sponsored 7/22/2025
Gary Peters
MI • D
Sponsored 7/28/2025
Andy Kim
NJ • D
Sponsored 7/28/2025
Peter Welch
VT • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Cory Booker
NJ • D
Sponsored 1/12/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
S51 — Washington, D.C. Admission Act
This bill would admit the District of Columbia as the State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth, giving its residents full congressional representation. It would also carve out a separate federal 'Capital' around core federal buildings and set a staged transition for courts, services, and federal property. - Residents: District residents would gain two Senators and one Representative immediately upon admission and the current non‑voting Delegate office would be repealed. - Territory and federal limits: A defined Capital area including the Capitol, White House, Supreme Court, and adjacent federal lands would remain under U.S. title or jurisdiction and generally would not be subject to state taxation except where Congress permits. - Courts, justice, and transition supports: The bill would keep federal prosecution support, U.S. Marshals services, pretrial and public defender arrangements, and Bureau of Prisons housing rules during transition; it would provide a temporary Federal Medical Assistance Percentage uplift for five years and establish an 18‑member Statehood Transition Commission to oversee the change.
S1503 — Equality Act
Treat sexual orientation and gender identity as forms of sex discrimination across federal law. The bill would explicitly add sexual orientation and gender identity to federal sex‑discrimination protections and apply those rules across many statutes and programs.
S852 — Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2025
Strengthens worker organizing rights and enforcement. The bill would expand who counts as employees and joint employers, speed representation and bargaining, require voter lists and workplace postings, and increase penalties and remedies for unfair labor practices. - Workers and jobseekers: Would broaden employee coverage and set a three-factor test that presumes employee status unless all three criteria are met. It would protect use of employer-provided electronic communications for organizing and clarify that the duration or pattern of strikes does not strip protection. - Employers and bargaining: Would require employers to provide unions detailed voter lists and timely notices. It would force a fast initial bargaining process with mandatory mediation and binding arbitration if negotiations fail. - Enforcement and remedies: Would expand National Labor Relations Board authority, allow private civil suits after a waiting period, make Board orders immediately effective, and raise civil penalties for unfair labor practices to up to $50,000 per violation and up to $100,000 for repeat or aggravated offenses.
S2150 — Women’s Health Protection Act of 2025
Guarantee nationwide protections for a person's right to obtain abortion services and a provider's right to deliver them. The Women's Health Protection Act of 2025 would create a federal rule that stops laws and rules that single out abortion or place heavier burdens on abortion than on similar medical procedures. It defines key terms, protects pre-viability care, allows post-viability care to protect life or health, and explicitly protects interstate travel and the movement of medicines, equipment, patients, and providers. - Families and patients: Would protect access to abortion before viability and allow post-viability care when needed to protect life or health. It would bar medically unnecessary in-person visit rules and stop forced disclosure of why a patient seeks care. - Health care providers: Would protect providers' ability to give abortion care including by telemedicine and across state lines, and would forbid facility, staffing, testing, or disclosure requirements that are not required for similar procedures. - States and interstate commerce: Would preempt conflicting state laws and recognize a right to travel and to assist others in getting reproductive health services across state lines. - Courts and enforcement: Would let the Attorney General sue and would create a private right of action so patients and providers can seek injunctive relief and attorney's fees. It would limit state sovereign immunity where federal law allows challenges.
S422 — Right to Contraception Act
This bill would create a federal guarantee of the right to obtain contraception and protect health care providers who offer contraceptives, related information, referrals, and services. - Individuals and families could obtain contraceptives and receive information or referrals without new federal or state restrictions stated in the bill. The protection expressly covers people regardless of income, race, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, immigration status, or location. - Health care providers would be protected when they prescribe, dispense, counsel about, or refer for contraceptives. The bill preserves the Food and Drug Administration's authority over approval, clearance, authorization, and licensure of contraceptives. - The law would preempt state and federal laws that restrict the sale, provision, or use of contraceptives while keeping certain federal coverage requirements intact. It establishes enforcement through private lawsuits and actions by the Attorney General in federal court, including injunctive relief and possible recovery of attorney's fees.
S2523 — John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025
This bill would restore and strengthen federal voting-rights protections by rewriting Section 2, creating a practice-based preclearance process for certain election changes, and boosting transparency and enforcement. - Voters in racial, language-minority, and Tribal communities would gain broader legal standards to challenge discrimination. The bill would add distinct Section 2 tests for vote-dilution, vote-denial, and intentional discrimination and add a retrogression standard that applies to actions taken on or after 2021. - State and local election officials would face new preclearance and public-notice rules. Covered changes like election methods, redistricting shifts, ID rules, polling-place moves, and voter-list removals would need review before implementation and require pre-election notices 30 days before Federal elections with 48-hour updates. - The Department of Justice and private citizens would get stronger tools to enforce rights. The Attorney General would centralize observers, extend bilingual protections to 2037, seek preventive relief, issue pre-action information demands, and pursue expanded court remedies.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in