Child Care for Working Families Act
Sponsored By: Senator Patty Murray
Introduced
Summary
This bill creates a new, comprehensive federal entitlement for children from birth through five that guarantees access to affordable, high‑quality early care and learning. It pairs a universal preschool program with multi‑year grants to stabilize providers and new Head Start wage and expansion funding.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
6 provisions identified: 6 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
Child care entitlement and copays
If enacted, beginning October 1, 2026, eligible children in States, Tribes, or Territories with approved plans who apply and are found eligible would be entitled to direct child care assistance. States would have to use a sliding fee scale tied to State median income: no copay at or below 85% of SMI, up to 2% between 85%–100% SMI, up to 4% between 100%–125% SMI, up to 7% between 125%–150% SMI, and 7% above 150% SMI; part-time care is prorated. After a State adopts the required cost model, providers could not charge families more than the public assistance plus the family copayment for eligible children.
Large grants to boost child care pay
If enacted, the bill would fund $9 billion a year from FY2026 through FY2031 for new grants to States and Tribal organizations. Most grant money would be paid as five-year subgrants and at least 70% of subgrant funds would have to go to child care personnel costs (wages, COLAs, and graduated pay increases). Lead agencies could keep up to 10% for administration and supply activities. Providers applying for grants would need to show plans for annual cost-of-living raises and pay steps, and BASE grant money would have to add to, not replace, existing public child care funding.
State rules for child care pay
If enacted, States getting program funds would have to certify that payment rates cover true child care costs and set rates using a statistically valid cost model updated at least every 3 years. States would have to ensure rates fund at least a living wage and match pay for elementary educators with similar credentials, and wages must get annual cost-of-living increases. For FY2026–2031 States must set aside 5%–10% of prior-year child care payments for quality and supply activities. Funds would have to supplement, not replace, existing public child care spending based on a 2023–2025 baseline.
More Head Start pay and hours
If enacted, the bill would provide $2.7 billion each year starting in FY2026 to help Head Start and Early Head Start raise teacher and staff pay to match elementary educators or at least a living wage. It would also reserve funds (including $4 billion from FY2026 funds) to help Head Start programs offer full-day, full-year services or continuous services for migrant programs and to improve quality. Grants would be used to extend hours for current slots and could not be used to expand total enrollment.
Federal funding for universal preschool
If enacted, the bill would pay a share of State preschool spending for FY2026–FY2031: 90% in FY2026–FY2027, 80% in FY2028, 75% in FY2029, 65% in FY2030, and 60% in FY2031. It would also provide large FY2026 appropriations, including $20 billion for local grants and Head Start awards, $2.5 billion for Tribes, $1.25 billion for Territories, and other funds available until September 30, 2031. Local programs getting funds would have to meet strong preschool standards (at least 1,020 hours per year, universal free access, outreach and priority enrollment for high-need children, and teacher degree and pay rules), follow nondiscrimination laws, and keep State pre-K funding from falling below the 2023–2025 baseline.
Federal oversight of child care programs
If enacted, the Secretary would review and monitor State, Tribal, Territory, and local compliance with the titles and State plans. The agency would set rules for receiving and deciding complaints, notify States when they fail to comply, require progress updates, and impose sanctions where allowed.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Patty Murray
WA • D
Cosponsors
Timothy Kaine
VA • D
Sponsored 7/15/2025
Mazie Hirono
HI • D
Sponsored 7/15/2025
Andy Kim
NJ • D
Sponsored 7/15/2025
Charles Schumer
NY • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Angela Alsobrooks
MD • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Tammy Baldwin
WI • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Michael Bennet
CO • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Richard Blumenthal
CT • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Lisa Blunt Rochester
DE • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Cory Booker
NJ • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Maria Cantwell
WA • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Christopher Coons
DE • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Catherine Cortez Masto
NV • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Tammy Duckworth
IL • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Richard Durbin
IL • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
John Fetterman
PA • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Ruben Gallego
AZ • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Kirsten Gillibrand
NY • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Maggie Hassan
NH • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Martin Heinrich
NM • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
John Hickenlooper
CO • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Mark Kelly
AZ • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Angus King
ME • I
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Amy Klobuchar
MN • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Sen. Luján, Ben Ray [D-NM]
NM • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Edward Markey
MA • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Jeff Merkley
OR • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Christopher Murphy
CT • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Alex Padilla
CA • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Gary Peters
MI • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
John Reed
RI • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Jacky Rosen
NV • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Bernie Sanders
VT • I
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Brian Schatz
HI • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Adam Schiff
CA • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Jeanne Shaheen
NH • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Elissa Slotkin
MI • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Tina Smith
MN • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Chris Van Hollen
MD • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Raphael Warnock
GA • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Peter Welch
VT • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Sheldon Whitehouse
RI • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Ron Wyden
OR • D
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
S1503 — Equality Act
Treat sexual orientation and gender identity as forms of sex discrimination across federal law. The bill would explicitly add sexual orientation and gender identity to federal sex‑discrimination protections and apply those rules across many statutes and programs.
S852 — Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2025
Strengthens worker organizing rights and enforcement. The bill would expand who counts as employees and joint employers, speed representation and bargaining, require voter lists and workplace postings, and increase penalties and remedies for unfair labor practices. - Workers and jobseekers: Would broaden employee coverage and set a three-factor test that presumes employee status unless all three criteria are met. It would protect use of employer-provided electronic communications for organizing and clarify that the duration or pattern of strikes does not strip protection. - Employers and bargaining: Would require employers to provide unions detailed voter lists and timely notices. It would force a fast initial bargaining process with mandatory mediation and binding arbitration if negotiations fail. - Enforcement and remedies: Would expand National Labor Relations Board authority, allow private civil suits after a waiting period, make Board orders immediately effective, and raise civil penalties for unfair labor practices to up to $50,000 per violation and up to $100,000 for repeat or aggravated offenses.
S2150 — Women’s Health Protection Act of 2025
Guarantee nationwide protections for a person's right to obtain abortion services and a provider's right to deliver them. The Women's Health Protection Act of 2025 would create a federal rule that stops laws and rules that single out abortion or place heavier burdens on abortion than on similar medical procedures. It defines key terms, protects pre-viability care, allows post-viability care to protect life or health, and explicitly protects interstate travel and the movement of medicines, equipment, patients, and providers. - Families and patients: Would protect access to abortion before viability and allow post-viability care when needed to protect life or health. It would bar medically unnecessary in-person visit rules and stop forced disclosure of why a patient seeks care. - Health care providers: Would protect providers' ability to give abortion care including by telemedicine and across state lines, and would forbid facility, staffing, testing, or disclosure requirements that are not required for similar procedures. - States and interstate commerce: Would preempt conflicting state laws and recognize a right to travel and to assist others in getting reproductive health services across state lines. - Courts and enforcement: Would let the Attorney General sue and would create a private right of action so patients and providers can seek injunctive relief and attorney's fees. It would limit state sovereign immunity where federal law allows challenges.
S2523 — John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025
This bill would restore and strengthen federal voting-rights protections by rewriting Section 2, creating a practice-based preclearance process for certain election changes, and boosting transparency and enforcement. - Voters in racial, language-minority, and Tribal communities would gain broader legal standards to challenge discrimination. The bill would add distinct Section 2 tests for vote-dilution, vote-denial, and intentional discrimination and add a retrogression standard that applies to actions taken on or after 2021. - State and local election officials would face new preclearance and public-notice rules. Covered changes like election methods, redistricting shifts, ID rules, polling-place moves, and voter-list removals would need review before implementation and require pre-election notices 30 days before Federal elections with 48-hour updates. - The Department of Justice and private citizens would get stronger tools to enforce rights. The Attorney General would centralize observers, extend bilingual protections to 2037, seek preventive relief, issue pre-action information demands, and pursue expanded court remedies.
S1115 — Paycheck Fairness Act
Stronger enforcement against sex-based wage discrimination. This bill would tighten legal remedies, expand pay-data reporting, and fund training and grants to help close persistent pay gaps between men and women. - Workers: Would expand protections so employees can discuss pay without retaliation and pursue compensatory and, for willful misconduct, punitive damages. It also narrows the employer "bona fide factor" defense so pay differences must be job-related and business-necessary. - Employers: Private firms with 100 or more employees would face new pay-data reporting requirements by sex, race, and ethnicity and public disclosure of aggregated results by industry, occupation, and metro area. - Federal contractors and agencies: The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs would restart and expand contractor pay surveys and must annually select not less than half of nonconstruction contractor establishments to report. The Bureau of Labor Statistics would continue tracking women in its employment survey. - Training, grants, and outreach: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and OFCCP must receive training funded by appropriations. A new competitive Negotiation Skills Training grant program would fund entities to teach pay negotiation and report on outcomes.
S3214 — Background Check Expansion Act
Would require background checks for most private firearm transfers by routing them through licensed dealers. This bill would create a new transfer framework that makes it unlawful for two unlicensed people to complete a firearm transfer without a licensed importer, manufacturer, or dealer first taking possession to run the check and comply with federal transfer rules. - Private sellers and buyers would have to route most sales through a licensed importer, manufacturer, or dealer who would take possession to run the background check and follow all transfer requirements. - Licensed importers, manufacturers, and dealers would be required to provide a notice of the prohibition and collect a certification on a form prescribed by the Attorney General before completing a transfer. - Close family and estate transfers would be exempt, including transfers between spouses, domestic partners, parents and children, siblings, aunts or uncles and nieces or nephews, and grandparents and grandchildren, and transfers by operation of law to executors or trustees. - Temporary and specific transfers would be exempt in narrowly defined situations. These include short-term transfers to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm, transfers approved under the tax code, and transfers that occur only at a shooting range or for hunting, trapping, or fishing while the transferor is present and has no reason to believe the transferee is prohibited. - Transfers to law enforcement officers, armed private security professionals acting within official duties, and members of the Armed Forces acting in their official capacity would be exempt. - The bill's amendments would take effect 180 days after enactment.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in