PrEP Access and Coverage Act of 2026
Sponsored By: Senator Tina Smith
Introduced
Summary
Guarantees no-cost access to PrEP and PEP across public and private health coverage. This bill would require plans to cover FDA-approved HIV prevention drugs, diagnostics, counseling, and follow-up, ban most prior authorization rules, strengthen privacy for family plans, bar insurers from penalizing people who take PrEP/PEP, and fund grants and education to boost access and uptake.
Show full summary
- People and families would get FDA-approved PrEP and PEP plus related tests, counseling, lab work, and adherence services with no cost-sharing in covered plans and, for most plans, no prior authorization. It would also keep PrEP/PEP use private within family health plans so other enrollees do not see that information.
- Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, VA, and DoD beneficiaries would see expanded prevention coverage. Medicare would add prevention services to Part B with no coinsurance or deductible and place prevention drugs in Part D with zero cost-sharing for plan years after January 1, 2027, while Medicaid and CHIP would align coverage and VA and DoD would remove cost-sharing as specified.
- States, tribes, community health centers, rural clinics, and nonprofit providers would be eligible for grants to pay for drugs, testing, outreach, administration, and adherence services, with programs required within 1 year of enactment. The bill would fund national public and provider education campaigns through FY2026–2030 and require evaluations and annual reports for five years.
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
10 provisions identified: 10 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
Insurers cannot penalize PrEP users
If enacted, life, disability, and long-term care insurers could not deny coverage, change terms, or charge higher premiums just because someone takes medication to prevent HIV. State insurance regulators would enforce these non-discrimination rules upon enactment.
Free PrEP for federal, military, veterans
If enacted, Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) plans would have to cover HIV prevention drugs and related care with no cost-sharing for plan years starting January 1, 2027. TRICARE would also cover HIV prevention with no cost-sharing for plan years starting January 1, 2027. The VA would stop charging copays for HIV prevention drugs, tests, and follow-up upon enactment.
Medicaid and CHIP cover PrEP free
If enacted, Medicaid would explicitly cover FDA-approved HIV prevention drugs, lab tests, and follow-up care upon enactment. Medicaid beneficiaries could not be charged copays or other cost-sharing for those covered HIV prevention services. CHIP would also be required to cover the same HIV prevention services with no cost-sharing starting January 1, 2027, though States that need new state law could delay until after their next legislative session ends.
Medicare covers PrEP with no drug fees
If enacted, Medicare Part B would treat HIV prevention services as covered Part B benefits for services furnished on or after January 1, 2027. For Part D, plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2027 would have no deductible, coinsurance, or other cost-sharing for covered HIV prevention drugs.
No preapproval and no-cost PrEP
If enacted, group health plans would generally have to cover FDA-approved PrEP and PEP drugs and related services without patient cost-sharing for plan years starting January 1, 2027. The bill would also bar most preauthorization rules for those drugs starting with plan years that begin January 1, 2027. A plan could impose preauthorization for a specific drug only if it covers a therapeutically equivalent drug without preauthorization.
Enforcement, reporting, and private lawsuits
If enacted, HHS and CDC would issue guidance, monitor compliance, and require group health plans to submit annual compliance data for ten years starting within one year of enactment. The bill would also let people sue in court if harmed by violations and recover costs and attorney fees. HHS must report to Congress about noncompliant plans starting two years after enactment and every two years for ten years.
Grant money and public PrEP campaigns
If enacted, HHS would set up a grant program within one year to fund state, tribal, and community PrEP and PEP programs. Grants could pay for drugs, labs, outreach, staff, and adherence services. The bill would also fund national public and provider education campaigns about PrEP/PEP for fiscal years 2026–2030.
Indian Health Service PrEP funding
If enacted, the Indian Health Service would be directed to provide FDA-approved HIV prevention drugs and related lab and follow-up services. The bill authorizes appropriations of such sums as are necessary to carry out this IHS funding upon enactment.
Privacy for family-plan PrEP use
If enacted, HHS would change HIPAA-related rules so people on a family health plan can get PrEP or PEP without the primary policyholder being told. The change is intended to prevent disclosures like explanations of benefits that would reveal PrEP use and would take effect upon enactment.
Which breast screening rules apply
If enacted, the bill would say which U.S. Preventive Services Task Force breast cancer screening recommendations count as the current guidance for this law and other laws. It treats current USPSTF guidance as current except for recommendations from around November 2009. This clarification would take effect upon enactment.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Tina Smith
MN • D
Cosponsors
Adam Schiff
CA • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Angela Alsobrooks
MD • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Tammy Baldwin
WI • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Richard Blumenthal
CT • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Cory Booker
NJ • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Christopher Coons
DE • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Catherine Cortez Masto
NV • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Tammy Duckworth
IL • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Andy Kim
NJ • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Amy Klobuchar
MN • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Edward Markey
MA • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Jeff Merkley
OR • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Alex Padilla
CA • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
John Reed
RI • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Jacky Rosen
NV • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Jeanne Shaheen
NH • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Elizabeth Warren
MA • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Ron Wyden
OR • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
John Hickenlooper
CO • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
S51 — Washington, D.C. Admission Act
This bill would admit the District of Columbia as the State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth, giving its residents full congressional representation. It would also carve out a separate federal 'Capital' around core federal buildings and set a staged transition for courts, services, and federal property. - Residents: District residents would gain two Senators and one Representative immediately upon admission and the current non‑voting Delegate office would be repealed. - Territory and federal limits: A defined Capital area including the Capitol, White House, Supreme Court, and adjacent federal lands would remain under U.S. title or jurisdiction and generally would not be subject to state taxation except where Congress permits. - Courts, justice, and transition supports: The bill would keep federal prosecution support, U.S. Marshals services, pretrial and public defender arrangements, and Bureau of Prisons housing rules during transition; it would provide a temporary Federal Medical Assistance Percentage uplift for five years and establish an 18‑member Statehood Transition Commission to oversee the change.
S1503 — Equality Act
Treat sexual orientation and gender identity as forms of sex discrimination across federal law. The bill would explicitly add sexual orientation and gender identity to federal sex‑discrimination protections and apply those rules across many statutes and programs.
S852 — Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2025
Strengthens worker organizing rights and enforcement. The bill would expand who counts as employees and joint employers, speed representation and bargaining, require voter lists and workplace postings, and increase penalties and remedies for unfair labor practices. - Workers and jobseekers: Would broaden employee coverage and set a three-factor test that presumes employee status unless all three criteria are met. It would protect use of employer-provided electronic communications for organizing and clarify that the duration or pattern of strikes does not strip protection. - Employers and bargaining: Would require employers to provide unions detailed voter lists and timely notices. It would force a fast initial bargaining process with mandatory mediation and binding arbitration if negotiations fail. - Enforcement and remedies: Would expand National Labor Relations Board authority, allow private civil suits after a waiting period, make Board orders immediately effective, and raise civil penalties for unfair labor practices to up to $50,000 per violation and up to $100,000 for repeat or aggravated offenses.
S2150 — Women’s Health Protection Act of 2025
Guarantee nationwide protections for a person's right to obtain abortion services and a provider's right to deliver them. The Women's Health Protection Act of 2025 would create a federal rule that stops laws and rules that single out abortion or place heavier burdens on abortion than on similar medical procedures. It defines key terms, protects pre-viability care, allows post-viability care to protect life or health, and explicitly protects interstate travel and the movement of medicines, equipment, patients, and providers. - Families and patients: Would protect access to abortion before viability and allow post-viability care when needed to protect life or health. It would bar medically unnecessary in-person visit rules and stop forced disclosure of why a patient seeks care. - Health care providers: Would protect providers' ability to give abortion care including by telemedicine and across state lines, and would forbid facility, staffing, testing, or disclosure requirements that are not required for similar procedures. - States and interstate commerce: Would preempt conflicting state laws and recognize a right to travel and to assist others in getting reproductive health services across state lines. - Courts and enforcement: Would let the Attorney General sue and would create a private right of action so patients and providers can seek injunctive relief and attorney's fees. It would limit state sovereign immunity where federal law allows challenges.
S2523 — John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025
This bill would restore and strengthen federal voting-rights protections by rewriting Section 2, creating a practice-based preclearance process for certain election changes, and boosting transparency and enforcement. - Voters in racial, language-minority, and Tribal communities would gain broader legal standards to challenge discrimination. The bill would add distinct Section 2 tests for vote-dilution, vote-denial, and intentional discrimination and add a retrogression standard that applies to actions taken on or after 2021. - State and local election officials would face new preclearance and public-notice rules. Covered changes like election methods, redistricting shifts, ID rules, polling-place moves, and voter-list removals would need review before implementation and require pre-election notices 30 days before Federal elections with 48-hour updates. - The Department of Justice and private citizens would get stronger tools to enforce rights. The Attorney General would centralize observers, extend bilingual protections to 2037, seek preventive relief, issue pre-action information demands, and pursue expanded court remedies.
S1115 — Paycheck Fairness Act
Stronger enforcement against sex-based wage discrimination. This bill would tighten legal remedies, expand pay-data reporting, and fund training and grants to help close persistent pay gaps between men and women. - Workers: Would expand protections so employees can discuss pay without retaliation and pursue compensatory and, for willful misconduct, punitive damages. It also narrows the employer "bona fide factor" defense so pay differences must be job-related and business-necessary. - Employers: Private firms with 100 or more employees would face new pay-data reporting requirements by sex, race, and ethnicity and public disclosure of aggregated results by industry, occupation, and metro area. - Federal contractors and agencies: The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs would restart and expand contractor pay surveys and must annually select not less than half of nonconstruction contractor establishments to report. The Bureau of Labor Statistics would continue tracking women in its employment survey. - Training, grants, and outreach: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and OFCCP must receive training funded by appropriations. A new competitive Negotiation Skills Training grant program would fund entities to teach pay negotiation and report on outcomes.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Start a Free Government Policy Watch to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.
Already have an account? Sign in