ConnecticutSB 002912026 Regular SessionSenateWALLET

AN ACT CONCERNING THE RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES OF THE STATE MARSHAL COMMISSION, THE STATE MARSHALS ADVISORY BOARD AND STATE MARSHALS.

Sponsored By: Judiciary Committee

Signed by Governor

Summary

To: (1) Make revisions to the duties and composition of the State Marshals Commission, (2) make revisions to the duties of the State Marshals Advisory Board, (3) ensure timely and reliable access to state marshals for service of a restraining order or a civil protection order, and (4) revise the fees associated with certain removal actions.

judiciary

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

6 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 1 costs, 2 mixed.

Debt collection fees track amounts recovered

Beginning October 1, 2026, the 15% execution fee follows the amount collected and paid over, or debt secured. When only part of the debt is collected or secured, the percentage applies only to that part. The $50 minimum fee still applies.

Stronger protections against improper marshal charges

Beginning October 1, 2026, marshals cannot knowingly charge or receive fees for work they did not perform. They cannot let someone else serve legal papers in their place. They also cannot knowingly file a false or illegal report of service. A violation without good cause can lead to a removal hearing. Removal requires cause, notice, and a hearing.

Prompt service required for protection orders

Beginning October 1, 2026, Connecticut’s State Marshal Commission must assign restraining and civil protection orders fairly within each county. It must also ensure prompt service. A marshal who refuses an assigned civil protection order without good cause can face a removal hearing. The same applies to failure to serve that order promptly.

Higher fee caps for eviction services

Beginning October 1, 2026, the fee cap for serving and scheduling eviction or foreclosure removal orders rises from $100 to $150. The hourly cap for specified removal services also rises from $100 to $150. These are maximum charges, not required prices. Mileage remains a separate charge.

Marshal applicants face screening and training

Beginning October 1, 2026, marshal applicants must be county voters with their permanent home, legal residence, and domicile there. They must pass application, exam, bonding, background investigation, interview, and training requirements, without disqualification under the specified criminal-record or licensing rules. Approved candidates get one statewide training program covering statutory duties, with approved vendor-led classes and supervised field instruction by experienced marshals. They must finish training before appointment. The Commission may favor regular weekday court-hour availability, or a good-faith ability and intent to transition within a reasonable time; neither is required.

Stronger marshal oversight with staffing limits

Beginning October 1, 2026, Connecticut’s State Marshal Commission oversees service, conduct, competence, appointments, and administrative systems. It oversees training and continuing education within available funding; no amount is specified. Before recruitment or exams, it must consult the advisory board and record county appointment numbers, adjustable for resignations or retirements. Interview committees must review applications, interview suitable candidates, and recommend candidates to the Commission. The Commission cannot fill vacancies in counties at or above statutory staffing limits, except under the existing exception in section 6-38f(a).

Sponsors & Cosponsors

Sponsor

  • Judiciary Committee

    Affiliation unavailable

Cosponsors

  • Steven J. Stafstrom

    Democratic • House

Roll Call Votes

All Roll Calls

Yes: 0 • No: 0

Senate vote • 3/30/2026

Senate Roll Call Vote 212

Yes: 0 • No: 0

House vote • 3/30/2026

House Roll Call Vote 246

Yes: 0 • No: 0

Senate vote • 3/30/2026

JUD Vote Tally Sheet (Joint Favorable Substitute)

Yes: 0 • No: 0

Bill Text

  • Public Act No. 26-80

    4/30/2026

  • File No. 613

    4/14/2026

  • JUD Joint Favorable Substitute

    3/30/2026

  • Raised Bill

    2/23/2026

  • Bill Analysis For File Copy 613

  • Fiscal Note For File Copy 613

  • House Roll Call Vote 246

  • JUD Joint Fav. Rpt

  • JUD Vote Tally Sheet (Joint Favorable Substitute)

  • Senate Roll Call Vote 212

  • Summary for Public Act No. 26-80

Related Bills

Back to State Legislation