All Roll Calls
Yes: 186 • No: 92
Sponsored By: James Burchett (Republican), Chuck Efstration (Republican), Kimberly New (Republican), Holt Persinger (Republican), Mitchell Scoggins (Republican), Tyler Paul Smith (Republican)
Became Law
Personalized for You
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
3 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 2 mixed.
Nonpartisan elections for judges and magistrates run with the general primary in even-numbered years. Candidate names go on the nonpartisan part of the ballot. Parties and petitions do not nominate these candidates. For local offices already set by local law to use nonpartisan primaries, the separate nonpartisan primary is removed. Those offices are elected in a single nonpartisan election held with the general primary. These changes take effect July 1, 2025.
Most of the law takes effect July 1, 2025. A later section starts January 1, 2027 only if voters approve a state constitutional change to make probate judge elections nonpartisan. If that amendment is not approved, this Act repeals itself. Where there is a conflict at ratification, this Act and the amendment control. All conflicting laws are repealed to the extent of the conflict.
County voters elect the chief magistrate at the general election before the term ends. The term starts on January 1 after the election and runs four years. Other magistrates are appointed by the chief magistrate with consent of superior court judges. Their terms line up with the chief magistrate’s term. Starting July 1, 2025, no local law can set partisan elections for any magistrate.
James Burchett
Republican • House
Chuck Efstration
Republican • House
Kimberly New
Republican • House
Holt Persinger
Republican • House
Mitchell Scoggins
Republican • House
Tyler Paul Smith
Republican • House
Rick Williams
Republican • Senate
All Roll Calls
Yes: 186 • No: 92
Senate vote • 3/21/2025
MOTION TO ENGROSS: HB 266, HB 426
Yes: 32 • No: 22
Senate vote • 3/21/2025
PASSAGE
Yes: 43 • No: 11
House vote • 3/4/2025
PASSAGE
Yes: 111 • No: 59
Effective Date
House Date Signed by Governor
Act 302
House Sent to Governor
Senate Engrossed
Senate Third Read
Senate Passed/Adopted
Senate Read Second Time
Senate Committee Favorably Reported
Senate Read and Referred
House Third Readers
House Passed/Adopted
House Committee Favorably Reported
House Withdrawn, Recommitted
House Second Readers
House First Readers
House Hopper
HB 426/AP* (v3)
HB 90 — Revenue and taxation; increase maximum acreage to qualify for assessment and taxation as a bona fide conservation use property
HB 739 — Lawrenceville, City of; annexation of certain territory; provide
HB 579 — Professions and businesses; licensure to engage in trade; provisions
SB 566 — Ad Valorem Taxation of Property; the acceptance of tax digests in the event of a publication error made by a newspaper; provide
SB 284 — "Georgia Uniform Securities Act of 2008,"; issuance of orders by the Commissioner of Securities directing persons who have violated certain securities provisions to return; authorize
HB 413 — Agriculture; prohibit local ordinances that prohibit operation of mobile sawmills on agricultural land