All Roll Calls
Yes: 217 • No: 6
Sponsored By: Matt Brass (Republican), Ed Harbison (Democrat), Harold Jones II (Democrat), Steven McNeel (Republican), Carden Summers (Republican), Larry Walker (Republican)
Became Law
Personalized for You
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
7 provisions identified: 4 benefits, 0 costs, 3 mixed.
A manufacturer or vendor cannot force a dealer to give direct or indirect access to the dealer’s data system. Any consent must be in a separate writing and can be withdrawn with 30 days’ notice, or immediately for cause. For incentive programs that began on or after July 1, 2019, consent cannot be required unless needed to run the program. No third party may access protected dealer data without the dealer’s prior written consent. Vendors may not charge more than direct integration costs and must provide a secure open API with the needed endpoints to authorized integrators on a dealer’s request, without access overcharges. Vendors must use a standard integration framework and allow reasonable STAR‑compatible integrations.
Manufacturers and their agents must follow all consumer‑data laws and cannot make dealers break them. Dealers can regularly monitor and audit data access, and can copy and back up their data to protect operations. Contracts must let dealers end a vendor or integrator with no more than 90 days’ notice, and the vendor or integrator must ensure a secure data transition in an accessible format and, if asked, list who received the data and allow an audit. On written request, once every six months, dealers get a written list of consumer data obtained and the recipients from the prior six months. On request, manufacturers must also provide a written statement of their data‑safeguard procedures. These rights cannot be waived by any contract or incentive program.
Manufacturers or distributors must give dealers a written list of features that can be changed by remote updates and any consumer charge known at the time of sale or lease. They may instead point dealers to a public website with the same information. When a customer or the manufacturer asks a dealer to help with a remote change, repair, or update at the dealership or an authorized location, the manufacturer or distributor must pay the dealer for that assistance.
Franchisors cannot take materially adverse actions against a dealer based on performance rules unless the rules are fair, reasonable, and based on accurate, relevant data. A franchisor cannot deny, delay, restrict, or bill back incentives, hold‑backs, or other amounts owed when the only reason is that the dealer followed the law instead of a conflicting program rule. If a dealer asks in writing, the franchisor must explain its vehicle allocation process in writing within 30 days. A reasonable quantity of vehicles must be fair and not unfairly discriminatory among same‑line dealers.
The law lets manufacturers and distributors use customer information tied to their own makes when needed for recalls, completing sales and delivery, paying incentives, warranty claims, market analysis, customer satisfaction checks, and reasonable marketing that benefits the dealer. It also clarifies limits: it does not give dealers ownership or broad sharing rights in vehicle diagnostic data beyond repair or warranty needs, does not cover data outside dealer systems, and does not change other duties manufacturers already have.
Vendors, integrators, and third parties must indemnify dealers for third‑party claims and costs that arise from willful, negligent, or impermissible use or disclosure of protected dealer data. Manufacturers and their affiliates must also indemnify dealers for harms caused by their illegal access, use, or disclosure of consumer data. Dealers are not responsible when a vendor’s or integrator’s actions prevent compliance or create liability; likewise, vendors and integrators are not responsible when the dealer’s own actions cause the problem. In any claim under these data‑protection rules, the person bringing the claim must prove the facts.
The law explains which actions count as acting as a new motor vehicle dealer. Selling or leasing, taking deposits or payments, processing a reservation for a specific vehicle, or negotiating a binding trade‑in value all count. Sharing MSRP, display‑only events, public websites with nonbinding conditional prices, facilitating deposits for a dealer, routed reservation systems where final terms are set by the franchised dealer, and processing a sold order entered by a franchised dealer do not count.
Matt Brass
Republican • Senate
Ed Harbison
Democrat • Senate
Harold Jones II
Democrat • Senate
Steven McNeel
Republican • Senate
Carden Summers
Republican • Senate
Larry Walker
Republican • Senate
Alan Powell
Republican • House
All Roll Calls
Yes: 217 • No: 6
House vote • 3/13/2025
PASSAGE
Yes: 165 • No: 5
Senate vote • 2/18/2025
PASSAGE BY SUBSTITUTE
Yes: 52 • No: 1
Effective Date
Senate Date Signed by Governor
Act 282
Senate Sent to Governor
House Third Readers
House Passed/Adopted
House Committee Favorably Reported
House Second Readers
House First Readers
Senate Third Read
Senate Passed/Adopted By Substitute
Senate Read Second Time
Senate Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute
Senate Read and Referred
Senate Hopper
SB 81/AP* (v8)
HB 90 — Revenue and taxation; increase maximum acreage to qualify for assessment and taxation as a bona fide conservation use property
HB 739 — Lawrenceville, City of; annexation of certain territory; provide
HB 579 — Professions and businesses; licensure to engage in trade; provisions
SB 566 — Ad Valorem Taxation of Property; the acceptance of tax digests in the event of a publication error made by a newspaper; provide
SB 284 — "Georgia Uniform Securities Act of 2008,"; issuance of orders by the Commissioner of Securities directing persons who have violated certain securities provisions to return; authorize
HB 413 — Agriculture; prohibit local ordinances that prohibit operation of mobile sawmills on agricultural land