MinnesotaHF 397094th Legislature, 2025-2026HouseWALLET

Remedy to extinguish a joint interest in a contract for deed of a perpetrator of domestic abuse or sexual assault established.

Sponsored By: Kelly Moller (Democratic)

Became Law

Judiciary Finance and Civil LawRules and Administration for comparison to SF3907

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.

Survivors can remove abusive co-buyers’ property interests

Beginning August 1, 2027, Minnesota gives unmarried victims a court process to remove an abusive co-buyer’s contract-for-deed interest. A contract for deed is a home purchase agreement with the seller. Qualifying conduct includes domestic abuse, criminal sexual assault, sexual extortion, or harassment. The process applies to petitions filed and served on or after that date, regardless of when the contract began. Victims must serve the co-buyer and current seller and record a public notice of the property case. Both have 90 days after notice to contest; if neither contests, the court must grant the petition. In contested cases, victims must show the abuse more likely happened than not. They must also prove six consecutive months when the co-buyer did not physically occupy the property and made no documented contract payments. Qualifying evidence includes protection orders, current no-contact orders, court or police records, or a prescribed statement from a qualified professional. Qualified professionals include licensed health-care professionals, domestic abuse advocates, and sexual assault counselors. Certain convictions or stays of adjudication create a legal presumption of the qualifying conduct. A court judgment transfers the removed interest to the victim and binds the seller and all buyers. The victim must record the judgment, which lists known liens but does not erase them. The removed co-buyer no longer has purchaser rights or duties to cure defaults or pay under the contract-for-deed enforcement notice process, even if the contract says otherwise.

Sponsors & Cosponsors

Sponsor

  • Kelly Moller

    Democratic • House

Cosponsors

  • Brion Curran

    Democratic • House

  • Cedrick Frazier

    Democratic • House

  • Gustafson

    Affiliation unavailable

Roll Call Votes

All Roll Calls

Yes: 184 • No: 15

Senate vote • 4/30/2026

Third Reading

Yes: 64 • No: 2

House vote • 4/23/2026

Passage, as amended

Yes: 120 • No: 13

Actions Timeline

  1. Secretary of State Chapter 80

    5/7/2026Senate
  2. Governor's action Approval

    5/7/2026Senate
  3. Presentment date

    5/6/2026Senate
  4. Returned from Senate

    5/4/2026House
  5. Third reading Passed vote: 64-2

    4/30/2026Senate
  6. Special Order: Rule 45 amendment stricken

    4/30/2026Senate
  7. Second reading

    4/28/2026Senate
  8. Comm report: Rule 45-amend, subst. General Orders SF3907

    4/28/2026Senate
  9. Referred to Rules and Administration for comparison to SF3907, now on General Orders

    4/27/2026Senate
  10. Introduction and first reading

    4/27/2026Senate
  11. Received from House

    4/27/2026Senate
  12. Bill was passed as amended vote: 120-13

    4/23/2026House
  13. Third reading as amended

    4/23/2026House
  14. Amendeda

    4/23/2026House
  15. House rule 1.21, placed on Calendar for the Day 04/23/2026

    4/22/2026House
  16. Second reading

    4/7/2026House
  17. Committee report, to adopt as amendeda

    4/7/2026House
  18. Author added Frazier and Curran

    3/26/2026House
  19. Introduction and first reading, referred to Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

    3/5/2026House

Bill Text

Related Bills

Back to State Legislation