All Roll Calls
Yes: 184 • No: 15
Sponsored By: Kelly Moller (Democratic)
Became Law
Personalized for You
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
Beginning August 1, 2027, Minnesota gives unmarried victims a court process to remove an abusive co-buyer’s contract-for-deed interest. A contract for deed is a home purchase agreement with the seller. Qualifying conduct includes domestic abuse, criminal sexual assault, sexual extortion, or harassment. The process applies to petitions filed and served on or after that date, regardless of when the contract began. Victims must serve the co-buyer and current seller and record a public notice of the property case. Both have 90 days after notice to contest; if neither contests, the court must grant the petition. In contested cases, victims must show the abuse more likely happened than not. They must also prove six consecutive months when the co-buyer did not physically occupy the property and made no documented contract payments. Qualifying evidence includes protection orders, current no-contact orders, court or police records, or a prescribed statement from a qualified professional. Qualified professionals include licensed health-care professionals, domestic abuse advocates, and sexual assault counselors. Certain convictions or stays of adjudication create a legal presumption of the qualifying conduct. A court judgment transfers the removed interest to the victim and binds the seller and all buyers. The victim must record the judgment, which lists known liens but does not erase them. The removed co-buyer no longer has purchaser rights or duties to cure defaults or pay under the contract-for-deed enforcement notice process, even if the contract says otherwise.
Kelly Moller
Democratic • House
Brion Curran
Democratic • House
Cedrick Frazier
Democratic • House
Gustafson
Affiliation unavailable
All Roll Calls
Yes: 184 • No: 15
Senate vote • 4/30/2026
Third Reading
Yes: 64 • No: 2
House vote • 4/23/2026
Passage, as amended
Yes: 120 • No: 13
Secretary of State Chapter 80
Governor's action Approval
Presentment date
Returned from Senate
Third reading Passed vote: 64-2
Special Order: Rule 45 amendment stricken
Second reading
Comm report: Rule 45-amend, subst. General Orders SF3907
Referred to Rules and Administration for comparison to SF3907, now on General Orders
Introduction and first reading
Received from House
Bill was passed as amended vote: 120-13
Third reading as amended
Amendeda
House rule 1.21, placed on Calendar for the Day 04/23/2026
Second reading
Committee report, to adopt as amendeda
Author added Frazier and Curran
Introduction and first reading, referred to Judiciary Finance and Civil Law
1st Engrossment
2nd Engrossment
Introduction
SF 4282, Various agency forecast adjustments
SF 4476, Omnibus Human Services supplemental appropriations
SF 334, Human Services Systems Modernization Advisory Council and Legislative Commission on Human Services Systems; creation
HF 3489, Licensing boards reporting required, criminal offense of grooming established, criminal penalties provided, and money appropriated.
HF 4188, Commerce policy bill.
HF 4252, Higher education finance and policy bill.