MinnesotaSF 220094th Legislature, 2025-2026Senate

Restorative practices statements and documents inadmissibility in civil and criminal proceedings establishment and data classification provision

Sponsored By: Sandra L. Pappas (Democratic)

Became Law

Judiciary and Public Safety

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.

More privacy for restorative justice participants

Minnesota law protects people attending restorative justice gatherings, where people work together to address and repair harm. Participants include facilitators, people harmed, people who caused harm, and others attending. Personal information collected or created to support participation is confidential. Participants’ statements and actions during registration, preparation, the gathering, and follow-up are also protected. These materials cannot be obtained through legal discovery or used in court or agency hearings, subject to listed exceptions. Government-held participant data are private, limiting public access. Participants can share their own information, statements, or actions and authorize others to disclose them. Organizers can share summaries that do not identify people and information needed to show compliance with court-ordered participation. Required abuse reporting still applies, and evidence otherwise allowed remains usable or available through discovery. Disclosures are also allowed to prevent death, serious bodily harm, or a crime, or report professional violations or abuse related to the practice.

Sponsors & Cosponsors

Sponsor

  • Sandra L. Pappas

    Democratic • Senate

Cosponsors

  • Anderson

    Affiliation unavailable

  • Jim Carlson

    Democratic • Senate

  • Curran

    Affiliation unavailable

  • Feist

    Affiliation unavailable

  • Harder

    Affiliation unavailable

  • Warren Limmer

    Republican • Senate

  • Schwartz

    Affiliation unavailable

  • Virnig

    Affiliation unavailable

  • Bonnie S. Westlin

    Democratic • Senate

Roll Call Votes

All Roll Calls

Yes: 162 • No: 36

House vote • 5/12/2025

Passage

Yes: 98 • No: 36

Senate vote • 4/25/2025

Third Reading

Yes: 64 • No: 0

Actions Timeline

  1. Secretary of State Chapter 24

    5/19/2025Senate
  2. Governor's action Approval

    5/19/2025Senate
  3. Returned from House

    5/13/2025Senate
  4. Bill was passed vote: 98-36

    5/12/2025House
  5. Third reading

    5/12/2025House
  6. House rule 1.21, placed on Calendar for the Day Monday, May 12, 2025

    5/8/2025House
  7. Second reading

    4/29/2025House
  8. Bills not identical, SF substituted on General Register

    4/29/2025House
  9. Senate file first reading, referred for comparison HF104

    4/28/2025House
  10. Received from Senate

    4/28/2025House
  11. Third reading Passed as amended vote: 64-0

    4/25/2025Senate
  12. Special Order: Amendeda 2

    4/25/2025Senate
  13. Author added Carlson

    4/1/2025Senate
  14. Second reading

    4/1/2025Senate
  15. Comm report: To pass as amendeda 1

    4/1/2025Senate
  16. Authors added Anderson; Limmer

    3/17/2025Senate
  17. Referred to Judiciary and Public Safety

    3/6/2025Senate
  18. Introduction and first reading

    3/6/2025Senate

Bill Text

Related Bills

Back to State Legislation