All Roll Calls
Yes: 300 • No: 190
Sponsored By: Brandon Ler (Republican)
Became Law
Personalized for You
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
7 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 2 costs, 4 mixed.
The law sets strict review clocks: 60 days for scoping, 90 days for a regular review, and 180 days for a detailed statement. Each can be extended once by up to 50%. After that, any delay needs the sponsor’s OK. If time runs out, the agency cannot block a permit unless it puts in writing that issuing it likely breaks a law or rule. Some permits are not covered by this “no withholding” rule. Agencies can only ask sponsors for information that is relevant and cannot demand extra‑detailed engineering. Public scoping notices must be neutral and avoid speculation. Sponsors can meet with the agency director, and if needed, speak to the environmental quality council or water policy committee with 30 days’ notice. Agencies also cannot deny or add permit conditions under this review law, unless the sponsor asks for mutual measures.
Only people who filed formal comments can challenge a final decision, and only on issues they raised. They must file within 60 days, and the case must be in the county where the project will happen. The challenger must pay the agency’s actual costs to compile and submit the certified record. Courts must rely on the agency record; new evidence must be sworn as new, material, and not previously public and is sent back to the agency first. Challengers must prove their claims by clear and convincing evidence. Injunctions are available only with a likely win on the merits, irreparable harm, and a public‑interest finding. The court must make written findings and require a bond or other written promise to cover costs, lost wages, and up to one year of lost project revenue if the injunction was wrong. For certain permit or license constitutional claims, the plaintiff must first prove the underlying statute is unconstitutional.
State environmental reviews cannot include greenhouse gas or climate‑impact analysis. Two exceptions apply: a joint review with a federal agency that requires it, or if Congress later regulates carbon dioxide under the Clean Air Act. Courts also cannot vacate or delay permits or similar approvals based only on greenhouse gas claims unless those federal conditions apply. If a coordination condition with another bill applies, the Department of Environmental Quality must issue public‑noticed guidance on when a greenhouse gas assessment is needed and how to do it.
At least half of certain environmental quality council appointees must come from legislative committees that handle these issues. The council must gather environmental data, review state programs, recommend policy, do studies, report to leaders, help lawmakers, and review rules and programs for DEQ, FWP, and DNRC.
The law repeals several earlier MEPA policy, goal, constitutionality, and venue sections. If this law and another bill both change the same code section, the overlapping changes are void and the coordinated text in this law controls.
When the public service regulator sets rates and charges for utilities, railroads, and motor carriers, it does not use these environmental review parts. This streamlines those cases but narrows environmental review in those proceedings.
Reviews must include a detailed statement of impacts, unavoidable harms, and reasonable alternatives that work with current technology. Alternatives must be economically feasible for similar projects, and the review must include a real no‑action option and note effects on private property. Agencies must look at cumulative impacts, but only count future projects already under study or permitting now. The law does not change agencies’ separate duties to meet Montana environmental standards or to coordinate with other governments. It also keeps state programs running during reviews and does not change constitutional private‑property rights.
Brandon Ler
Republican • House
There are no cosponsors for this bill.
All Roll Calls
Yes: 300 • No: 190
House vote • 4/15/2025
Do Concur
Yes: 63 • No: 34
House vote • 4/14/2025
Do Concur
Yes: 61 • No: 35
House vote • 4/4/2025
Do Concur
Yes: 31 • No: 18
House vote • 4/3/2025
Do Concur
Yes: 30 • No: 19
House vote • 2/13/2025
Do Pass
Yes: 57 • No: 42
House vote • 2/12/2025
Do Pass
Yes: 58 • No: 42
Chapter Number Assigned
Signed by Governor
Transmitted to Governor
Signed by President
Signed by Speaker
Returned from Enrolling
Sent to Enrolling
3rd Reading Passed as Amended by Senate
2nd Reading Senate Amendments Concurred
Returned to House with Amendments
3rd Reading Concurred
2nd Reading Concurred
2nd Reading Pass Consideration
Committee Report--Bill Concurred as Amended
Committee Executive Action--Bill Concurred as Amended
Hearing
Referred to Committee
First Reading
Transmitted to Senate
3rd Reading Passed
2nd Reading Passed
Committee Report--Bill Passed
Committee Executive Action--Bill Passed
Hearing
First Reading
Enrolled
4/15/2025
As Amended (Version 2)
3/31/2025
Introduced
1/22/2025