MontanaSB 30069th Legislature, Regular Session (2025)SenateWALLET

Providing protections for service dogs and handlers

Sponsored By: Denley Loge (Republican)

Became Law

SafetyCrimesDiscrimination and Human Rights

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

3 provisions identified: 2 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.

Criminal penalties and restitution for service animals

It is a misdemeanor to harass a service animal after a warning or to negligently harm, disable, or kill it. Owners who negligently let their animal interfere can be charged, with a fine up to $1,000. It is also misdemeanor theft to purposely take or control a service animal to deprive the handler. After any conviction, courts must order full restitution. Restitution can pay the animal’s value (purchase, training, licensing, equipment), retraining or replacement training, vet care, the handler’s medical bills, handler training, and lost wages. Civil lawsuits are still allowed.

Stronger dog-bite liability protecting service animals

If a dog, without provocation, bites a person or a service animal in public or when lawfully on private property in a city or town, the owner is liable for damages. Owners are liable even if the dog had no prior vicious history. Counties may regulate, restrain, control, kill, or quarantine vicious dogs, and these rules expressly protect service animals. Violations of local rules remain misdemeanors.

Clear access and control rules for service animals

Places that ban animals must post that service animals are allowed. A service animal in training must wear written ID readable from at least 20 feet. A service animal must be under the handler’s control as required by federal rules (28 CFR 35.136 as of Oct 1, 2019). Staff may ask two questions: if the animal is needed because of a disability and what task it performs. A business can require removal if the animal is not controlled and the handler does not act, or if it is not housebroken. If removed, the handler must be allowed to get the service without the animal.

Sponsors & Cosponsors

Sponsor

  • Denley Loge

    Republican • Senate

Cosponsors

  • Jane Weber

    Democrat • House

Roll Call Votes

All Roll Calls

Yes: 288 • No: 5

Senate vote 4/9/2025

Do Concur

Yes: 97 • No: 0

Senate vote 4/8/2025

Do Concur

Yes: 96 • No: 1

Senate vote 3/5/2025

Do Pass

Yes: 47 • No: 2

Senate vote 3/4/2025

Do Pass

Yes: 48 • No: 2

Actions Timeline

  1. Chapter Number Assigned

    5/13/2025Senate
  2. Signed by Governor

    5/8/2025Senate
  3. Transmitted to Governor

    4/30/2025Senate
  4. Signed by Speaker

    4/29/2025House
  5. Signed by President

    4/21/2025Senate
  6. Returned from Enrolling

    4/11/2025Senate
  7. Sent to Enrolling

    4/9/2025Senate
  8. 3rd Reading Concurred

    4/9/2025House
  9. 2nd Reading Concurred

    4/8/2025House
  10. Committee Report--Bill Concurred

    3/26/2025House
  11. Committee Executive Action--Bill Concurred

    3/25/2025House
  12. Hearing

    3/19/2025House
  13. First Reading

    3/6/2025House
  14. Referred to Committee

    3/5/2025House
  15. Transmitted to House

    3/5/2025Senate
  16. 3rd Reading Passed

    3/5/2025Senate
  17. 2nd Reading Passed

    3/4/2025Senate
  18. Committee Report--Bill Passed

    3/1/2025Senate
  19. Committee Executive Action--Bill Passed

    2/28/2025Senate
  20. Hearing

    2/21/2025Senate
  21. Referred to Committee

    2/13/2025Senate
  22. First Reading

    2/12/2025Senate
  23. Introduced

    2/11/2025Senate

Bill Text

  • Enrolled

    4/15/2025

  • Introduced

    2/11/2025

Related Bills

Back to State Legislation