NevadaSB31683rd Regular Session (2025)SenateWALLET

AN ACT relating to insurance; requiring health insurers, pharmacy benefit managers and the Commissioner of Insurance to prepare certain reports; expanding the scope of certain provisions relating to pharmacy benefit managers; prohibiting pharmacy benefit managers from engaging in certain practices; requiring pharmacy benefit managers to make certain disclosures; imposing requirements relating to the compensation of pharmacy benefit managers; revising requirements relating to the collection of certain medical debt; providing civil and criminal penalties; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.

Sponsored By: Jeff Stone (Republican), Robin L. Titus (Republican), Rochelle T. Nguyen (Democratic)

Failed

BDR 57-777

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

12 provisions identified: 11 benefits, 1 costs, 0 mixed.

Patients gain hospital debt cancellation protections

Beginning January 1, 2026, hospitals violating specified state or federal price-transparency rules cannot pursue qualifying medical debt. This covers debt originally billed with a charge above the published amount for the service, product, or device. Hospitals cannot send it to collectors, sue, seek arbitration or mediation, or cause it to be reported to reporting agencies. Collection must stop during investigation when you file with Nevada’s Bureau of Consumer Protection and immediately notify the hospital. If the Bureau finds a violation, the hospital must cancel the covered and related medical debt and refund payments. The protections reach qualifying debt incurred before, on, or after January 1, 2026; operation of the specified sections requires enactment and approval of Assembly Bill 343.

People can request electronic public records

Beginning January 1, 2026, Nevada government entities must provide electronic public records on request, generally in the requested format. They cannot deny access merely because confidential information appears in a record when it can be separated or removed. Exceptions cover records neither created nor available electronically, access to proprietary software, and confidential information that cannot be separated. The requested-format requirement also remains subject to limits in Nevada’s public-records law.

Drug benefit managers must protect patients

Pharmacy benefit managers must put covered patients’ interests first and act fairly toward contracting parties and pharmacies. The duty to patients takes priority when these duties conflict, and waivers of the duties are void. Managers must give written notice of interfering conflicts and avoid practices reasonably expected to create them. They must follow insurance-law requirements when managing benefits for a licensed insurer. They also cannot make or share false, deceptive, or misleading statements or ads.

Drug rebates count toward patient costs

Covered health plans must calculate your prescription drug cost-sharing at the pharmacy counter using the drug’s net price, including rebates. This rule applies when the policy or plan provides prescription drug coverage and falls within the law’s scope. It can lower what you pay when rebates reduce that price, but the law guarantees no fixed savings amount. The law phases in cost-sharing provisions, with some taking effect January 1, 2028.

Patients keep more pharmacy choices

Pharmacy benefit managers cannot steer patients to affiliated pharmacies when an eligible, unaffiliated pharmacy is in the network. They cannot unfairly restrict pharmacy choice, mislead patients about required pharmacies, or obstruct timely access to prescribed drugs or devices. Unaffiliated pharmacies cannot receive worse terms or lose network or preferred status when they accept the terms given to affiliated pharmacies. Managers cannot use pharmacy or pharmacy-services-group contracts to restrict unaffiliated pharmacies from contracting with others. They also cannot make, change, enforce, or renew manufacturer contracts that give plans exclusive coverage of a drug, device, or product.

State employee plans gain insurance oversight

Beginning January 1, 2028, the Nevada Board must follow listed insurance rules when providing health coverage through self-insurance. It must comply in the same manner as a licensed insurer. This includes applicable provisions of this act, except section 36. The change extends oversight but does not set a specific new benefit amount.

Patients and pharmacies gain complaint protections

Nevada’s Insurance Commissioner must receive, investigate, and track complaints about pharmacy benefit managers from people in Nevada. The Commissioner must publish complaints found more likely than not justified by a violation of the covered laws. Managers cannot punish pharmacies for reporting possible insurance-law violations or trying to settle related disputes. Banned retaliation includes specified contract actions, extra audits, and unjustified payment delays. Managers face $1,000 to $7,500 per covered violation; the Attorney General can recover these penalties in addition to other remedies.

Drug benefit contracts become more transparent

Pharmacy benefit managers must give contracting third parties requested written totals and types of charges, fees, commissions, and specified rebates. They must also provide requested clinical evidence about decisions on which drugs a plan covers. Nevada’s Insurance Commissioner can inspect managers’ contracts with pharmacies and third parties upon request. Pharmacies can share their contracts with the Commissioner, and terms blocking that disclosure are void.

Nevada can oversee some out-of-state policies

Nevada’s Insurance Commissioner can require specified Nevada standards for policies issued by Nevada-based insurers to residents of another state. The other state’s insurance official must first report that the policy is not subject to that state’s approval or disapproval. The Commissioner applies these standards by ruling. This authority does not guarantee a new coverage amount or lower premium.

Pharmacies face fewer late claim changes

Pharmacy benefit managers generally cannot cut or deny a drug claim after it has been processed. Exceptions cover fraud, services already paid for, or services not provided. Before reversing and resubmitting a claim, managers must notify the pharmacy and try to resolve the issue. Reversal and resubmission must happen within 90 days of the claim’s first approval. Managers cannot refuse payment because a pharmacy contract ended, except while investigating possible insurance fraud.

Pharmacies gain payment floors and protections

Pharmacy benefit managers cannot pay a pharmacy less for a drug than its purchase cost shown on the wholesaler’s invoice. They cannot use later payment reconciliations to lower the pharmacy’s effective payment rate. They also cannot charge pharmacies or pharmacists a fee for processing claims electronically. These rules protect pharmacy revenue but do not require savings to reach patients.

Some plans miss or delay protections

Plans governed by the federal ERISA law are exempt from Nevada’s pharmacy benefit manager rules unless their contracts require compliance. Specified managed-care coverage for Medicaid, CHIP, public employee benefits members, and local government officers, employees, and dependents is also exempt. These exemptions concern the specified coverage, not every obligation elsewhere in the law. The act’s amendments do not apply to agreements made before January 1, 2026, while the original agreements remain in effect. They apply when those agreements renew.

Sponsors & Cosponsors

Sponsors

  • Jeff Stone

    Republican • Senate

  • Robin L. Titus

    Republican • Senate

  • Rochelle T. Nguyen

    Democratic • Senate

Cosponsors

  • Carrie Ann Buck

    Republican • Senate

  • James Ohrenschall

    Democratic • Senate

  • Lisa Krasner

    Republican • Senate

  • Melanie Scheible

    Democratic • Senate

  • Michelee "Shelly" Cruz-Crawford

    Democratic • Senate

  • Skip Daly

    Democratic • Senate

Roll Call Votes

All Roll Calls

Yes: 60 • No: 2

House vote • 6/2/2025

Final Passage - Assembly (3rd Reprint)

Yes: 42 • No: 0

Senate vote • 5/29/2025

Final Passage - Senate (1st Reprint)

Yes: 18 • No: 2

Actions Timeline

  1. From printer. To reengrossment. Reengrossed. Fourth reprint.

    6/4/2025House
  2. (No further action taken.)

    6/3/2025House
  3. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 42, Nays: None.) To printer.

    6/2/2025House
  4. Dispensed with reprinting.

    6/2/2025House
  5. Read third time. Amended. (Amend. No. 999.)

    6/2/2025House
  6. From printer. To reengrossment. Reengrossed. Third reprint.

    6/2/2025House
  7. Read third time. Amended. (Amend. No. 957.) To printer.

    6/1/2025House
  8. Read second time.

    5/31/2025House
  9. Placed on Second Reading File.

    5/31/2025House
  10. From committee: Do pass.

    5/31/2025House
  11. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. To committee.

    5/30/2025House
  12. In Assembly.

    5/30/2025House
  13. From printer. To re-engrossment. Re-engrossed. Second reprint. To Assembly.

    5/30/2025Senate
  14. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 18, Nays: 2, Excused: 1.) To printer.

    5/29/2025Senate
  15. Reprinting dispensed with.

    5/29/2025Senate
  16. Read third time. Amended. (Amend. No. 848.)

    5/29/2025Senate
  17. Placed on General File.

    5/29/2025Senate
  18. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended.

    5/29/2025Senate
  19. To committee.

    4/22/2025Senate
  20. From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint.

    4/22/2025Senate
  21. Taken from General File. Re-referred to Committee on Finance. Exemption effective. To printer.

    4/18/2025Senate
  22. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 190.)

    4/18/2025Senate
  23. Notice of eligibility for exemption.

    4/18/2025Senate
  24. Placed on Second Reading File.

    4/18/2025Senate
  25. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended.

    4/18/2025Senate

Bill Text

Related Bills

Back to State Legislation