152 opinions issued in 1975.
Opinion No. 27-75 — CITIES.; COUNTIES.; CITY PARKS.; RECREATION.; FEDERAL GRANTS.; WATERSHED DISTRICTS.; COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.; UNIFORM RELOCATION ASSISTANCE ACT.
Mar 24, 1975
(1) The city of Holden may contribute funds to a multi-purpose watershed protection project six miles outside the city limits which includes recreational facilities pursuant to Section 278.145, RSMo, and (2) the city of Holden, Missouri, Johnson County, Missouri, and the South Fork of the Blackwater River Watershed Subdistrict have the authority to make relocation assistance payments pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 4601, et seq.
Opinion No. 39-75
Mar 20, 1975
Opinion letter to the Honorable Christopher S. Bond
Opinion No. 62-75 — SAVINGS AND LOAN.; DEPOSITARIES.; SCHOOL DISTRICTS.; SCHOOLS.
Mar 19, 1975
Qualifying school districts may place certain funds in savings accounts or certificates of deposit in insured savings and loan associations under the provisions of Section 369.194, RSMo Supp. 1973 and Section 165.051, RSMo.
Opinion No. 53-75 — COMPENSATION.; ADJUTANT GENERAL.; STATE EMPLOYEES.; REORGANIZATION ACT.; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY.
Mar 18, 1975
(1) Department heads have authority under Senate Bill No. 1, General Assembly, to set the salary of division and other administrative positions subject to appropriations therefor. (2) The salary of the Adjutant General established by the first departmental plan filed before June 30, 1974, providing for a salary of $18,000.00 per year for the Adjutant General, constitutes the salary which the Adjutant General may be paid at present. The salary may be changed by a subsequent departmental plan.
Opinion No. 50-75 — CONVICTS.; PROBATION AND PAROLE.
Mar 12, 1975
Section 549.071, RSMo 1969, authorizes courts to grant extensions of paroles subject to statutory restrictions and authorizes such courts to grant terms of parole which extend beyond the original expiration date of a parolee's sentence.
Opinion No. 3-75
Mar 11, 1975
Opinion letter to the Honorable Phillip H. Snowden
Opinion No. 29-75
Mar 11, 1975
Opinion letter to the Honorable John W. , II
Opinion No. 12-75
Mar 11, 1975
Opinion letter to Herbert R. Domke , M.D.
Opinion No. 26-75
Mar 5, 1975
Opinion letter to the Honorable Robert 0. Snyder
Opinion No. 33-75 — SCHOOLS.
Mar 4, 1975
In computing “the average cost of transporting all children of the district” and in computing “the additional cost of transporting handicapped and severely handicapped children” for the purposes of Section 162.985, RSMo 1973 Supp., all expenditures reasonably related to the school district’s transportation program should be included in the computation. The amount of additional state transportation aid authorized by Section 162.985, RSMo 1973 Supp., with respect to handicapped and severely handicapped children should be determined by the following formula: a district’s average cost of transporting a handicapped or severely handicapped child minus average per pupil cost of transporting all children in the district (handicapped, severely handicapped and non-handicapped) times the number of handicapped and severely handicapped children transported divided by two.
Opinion No. 93-75
Mar 3, 1975
Opinion letter to the Honorable John W. , II
Opinion No. 88-75 — ASSESSMENTS.; STATE AUDITOR.; STATE TAX COMMISSION.
Feb 28, 1975
(1) The State Tax Commission has the authority and is obligated to equalize the assessments of property among the various counties and the City of St. Louis pursuant to Section 138.390, RSMo, and has the duty to order any county in which valuations of property are below 33 1/3% of true value to raise the valuation of such property to 33 1/3% of true value and to order any county in which valuations of property are above 33 1/3% of true value to lower the valuation of such property to 33 1/3% of true value. (2) The State Tax Commission has no authority to equalize the assessments among various parcels of property within a county as such, but individual assessments can be raised or lowered pursuant to Sections 138.380, 138.460, and 138.470, RSMo. (3) The State Auditor has no authority to compel the State Tax Commission to require the equalization of assessments among the various counties or the City of St. Louis at 33 1/3% of true value.
Opinion No. 25-75 — DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES.; REORGANIZATION ACT.; MERIT SYSTEM.
Feb 28, 1975
No merit status can be lost by the transfer or realignment of a unit or position under the Reorganization Act where the essential identity of the position or unit is retained and the position or unit was within merit coverage on the effective date of the Act. A position which was subject to the provisions of the merit system law on the effective date of the Reorganization Act cannot be named as one of three "exempt" positions by a division director under Section 13.1 of that Act.
Opinion No. 89-75
Feb 27, 1975
Opinion letter to Mr. Paul W. Collins
Opinion No. 72-75
Feb 27, 1975
Opinion letter to Mr. Edward A. Godar
Opinion No. 14-75
Feb 21, 1975
Opinion letter to Mr. Mark L. Edelman
Opinion No. 44-75
Feb 19, 1975
Opinion letter to the Honorable Howard M. Garrett
Opinion No. 30-75
Feb 19, 1975
Opinion letter to Dr. Robert D. Elsea
Opinion No. 85-75
Feb 14, 1975
Opinion letter to the Honorable Nelson B. Tinnin
Opinion No. 10-75 — SUNSHINE BILL.; COUNTY COUNCIL.; PUBLIC MEETINGS.
Feb 11, 1975
Luncheon meetings of either the majority party members or of the minority party members of the St. Louis County Council, at which public business is discussed, are required to be open to the public under the Sunshine Bill.
Opinion No. 87-75
Feb 10, 1975
Opinion letter to the Honorable Skelton
Opinion No. 51-75
Feb 10, 1975
Opinion letter to the Honorable D. R. Osbourn
Opinion No. 31-75
Feb 10, 1975
Opinion letter to Mr. George M. Camp
Opinion No. 80-75
Feb 6, 1975
Opinion letter to Mr. Lawrence Graham
Opinion No. 37-75 — GOVERNOR.; MERIT SYSTEM.; REORGANIZATION ACT.; DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION.; COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION.
Feb 5, 1975
Division heads who are provided for in departmental plans pursuant to Section 1.6(2) of S.B. No. 1, First Extraordinary Session, General Assembly, are division heads who are to be appointed by the department director under Section 1.6(6) of S.B. No. 1, and therefore such appointments come under the exemption of subsection 1(1) of Section 36.030, H.B. No. 8, First Extraordinary Session, General Assembly, and are not covered by provisions of the merit system law, subject, of course, to Article IV, Section 19, Constitution of Missouri.
Opinion No. 78-75
Feb 4, 1975
Opinion letter to the Honorable Theodore L. Johnson,
Opinion No. 71-75
Feb 4, 1975
Opinion letter to the Honorable Fred Williams
Opinion No. 1-75
Jan 31, 1975
Opinion letter to Herbert R. Domke , M.D.
Opinion No. 73-75
Jan 29, 1975
Opinion letter to Mr. William J. Raftery
Opinion No. 21-75 — STATE EMPLOYEES.; TORT DEFENSE FUND.; CONSERVATION COMMISSION.
Jan 29, 1975
The Conservation Commission may not pay a final judgment for actual or punitive damages obtained against one of its enforcement officers as a result of his conduct while he was in the actual performance of his enforcement duties.
Opinion No. 16-75
Jan 29, 1975
Opinion letter to Mr. Lee E. Norbury
Opinion No. 74-75
Jan 27, 1975
Opinion letter to Mr. William J. Raftery
Opinion No. 43-75
Jan 27, 1975
Opinion letter to Harold P. , M.D.
Opinion No. 42-75
Jan 27, 1975
Opinion letter to the Honorable Lawrence J. Lee
Opinion No. 61-75
Jan 23, 1975
Opinion letter to the Honorable Frank
Opinion No. 47-75 — LIENS.; MECHANICS' LIENS.
Jan 15, 1975
Only a contractor who deals directly with a consumer is required to provide the notice specified in Section 429.010, House Bill 1251, General Assembly. A subcontractor who further subcontracts the supplying of labor or materials is not required to provide notice. An original contractor supplying materials which its own employees install in the home of a consumer is required to give the notice provided for in Section 429.010.
Opinion No. 17-75
Jan 15, 1975
Opinion letter to the Honorable J. William Holliday
Opinion No. 32-75 — SHERIFFS.; PARTITION.; COMPENSATION.; CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
Jan 13, 1975
Sheriffs in a third or fourth class county may not be appointed to the office of special commissioner pursuant to Section 528.540, RSMo 1969, relating to partitions; a sheriff in the above counties may be appointed as one of the commissioners under Section 528.200, RSMo 1969; a sheriff appointed to the position of commissioner under Section 528.200, RSMo 1969, may retain the fees he receives as compensation for his service in that position, and the wife of a sheriff may be appointed to either the position of commissioner or special commissioner and may retain the fees that she receives therefor.
Opinion No. 2-75
Jan 8, 1975
Opinion letter to the Honorable Ed
Opinion No. 6-75
Jan 6, 1975
Opinion letter to the Honorable James A. Noland , Jr.
Opinion No. 54-75
Jan 6, 1975
Opinion letter to the Honorable Richard J. DeCoster
Opinion No. 99-75
Jan 1, 1975
Opinion letter to the Honorable Clarence H. Heflin
Opinion No. 84-75
Jan 1, 1975
Opinion letter to Mr. William J. Raftery
Opinion No. 70-75 — SEWERS.; SEWER DISTRICTS.; COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.; COUNTY COURT.; SEWER SUBDISTRICTS.
Jan 1, 1975
A county court may create a sewer subdistrict pursuant to Sections 204.331 and 204.332, RSMo Supp. 1973, and such subdistrict shall have, in addition to those powers specified in Section 204.331, the powers given to sewer districts under Sections 249.430 to 249.660, RSMo 1969. However, in the creation of such a sewer subdistrict under Section 204.331, et seq. , the county court must comply with the provisions of Sections 249.470 and 249.480, RSMo 1969. If such a sewer subdistrict is created, the county court, as governing body of the sewer subdistrict, may enter into a contract with a common sewer district created pursuant to Section 204.250, RSMo Supp. 1973, and Sections 204.260 to 204.470, RSMo 1969, whereby the common sewer district would provide any engineering, construction, maintenance, repair and administrative services required for the collection and treatment of sewage generated within the subdistrict.
Opinion No. 46-75
Jan 1, 1975
Opinion letter to Dr. Jack Cross
Opinion No. 41-75
Jan 1, 1975
Opinion letter to Mr. Edward A. Godar
Opinion No. 40-75 — HOSPITALS.; PHYSICIANS.; FEDERAL GRANTS.; PUBLIC RECORDS.; DIVISION OF HEALTH.
Jan 1, 1975
The State Board of Health is authorized by law to adopt and enforce regulations requiring hospitals licensed by the state to submit reports containing certain data relating to hospital discharges.
Opinion No. 224-75 — AUDITS.; COUNTIES.; STATE AUDITOR.; COUNTY HOSPITALS.
Jan 1, 1975
The State Auditor is obligated to include county hospitals established pursuant to Sections 205.160 to 205.340, RSMo, within the scope of his audit of counties containing such an institution.
Opinion No. 22-75
Jan 1, 1975
Opinion letter to Mr. George M. Camp
Opinion No. 111-75 — SCHOOLS.; SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION.
Jan 1, 1975
The board of education of a six-director public school district is not authorized by Section 167.231, RSMo, to submit to the voters of the district the question of whether transportation to and from school at the expense of the district should be provided for pupils living one mile or more from school.