Research About Meet PRIA

Support Data Sources Privacy Policy Terms of Servicehello@policyrisk.com

© 2026 PRIA Technologies, LLC. All rights reserved.

PRIA provides educational policy intelligence and is not a source of investment, legal, or financial advice. Content is for informational purposes only.

™

Your Policy Risk Impact Agent

Research

At My Address
Federal Courts
Daily Briefings
Medicare & Social Security
Policy Risk Index
Congressional Bills
Federal Register
Tariffs
Fed Decisions & The Economy
State Tracker
World Watch
U.S. Code
U.S. Constitution
Aliens

Knowledge

Search Polipedia
Daily Briefings
Calculators
Policy Risk Index
What is Policy Risk?
The Countdown

Company

About PRIA
Support

Get PRIA

Support Data Sources Privacy Policy Terms of Service

hello@policyrisk.com

© 2026 PRIA Technologies, LLC. All rights reserved.

PRIA is a trademark of PRIA Technologies, LLC.

PRIA provides educational policy intelligence and is not a source of investment, legal, or financial advice. Content is for informational purposes only.

Missouri Attorney General Opinions

™

Your Policy Risk Impact Agent

Missouri/AG Opinions

← All Missouri coverage

Missouri AG Opinions, 2004

6 opinions issued in 2004.

All years8,473 202016 2019272 2018116 2017476 2016283 2015337 20131 2011101 200968 200887 200740 200633 20058 20046 20037 200215 200165 200058 199943 199827 199722 199679 199522 199415 199335 199243 199168 199052 198948 198877 198788 198658 198572 198462 198371 198272 198191 1980134 1979121 1978104 1977136 1976148 1975152 1974212 1973193 1972171 1971279 1970107 1969291 1968192 1967182 1966215 1965200 1964248 1963203 1962184 196169 196047 195845 195761 195664 195579 195473 195379 195262 195173 195071 194871 194781 194681 194576 194468 194386 194285 194181 194080 193888 193786 193684 193591 193493 193393

6 opinions·Filtered by2004✕

Opinion No. 80-2004 — CHARTER COUNTIES.; COUNTY COLLECTOR.; JACKSON COUNTY.; TAX COLLECTIONS.
Apr 8, 2004
The Jackson County Collector lacks authority to waive interest or penalties assessed on delinquent real or personal property taxes.
Open opinion ↗
Opinion No. 93-2004 — INITIATIVE PETITION.; INITIATIVES.
Mar 4, 2004
Review and approval pursuant to Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of a statutory initiative petition relating to electoral reform (version 4).
Open opinion ↗
Opinion No. 85-2004 — INITIATIVE PETITION.; INITIATIVES.
Feb 13, 2004
Review and approval pursuant to Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition relating to amendments to various provisions of the Constitution of Missouri concerning highways and transportation (version 2).
Open opinion ↗

Opinion No. 82-2004 — INITIATIVE PETITION.; INITIATIVES.

Feb 5, 2004

Review and approval pursuant to Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition relating to amendments to various provisions of the Constitution of Missouri concerning highways and transportation (version 1).

Open opinion ↗

Opinion No. 69-2004 — AMBULANCES AND AMBULANCE SERVICE.; AMBULANCE DISTRICTS.; MERCHANTS AND MANUFACTURERES REPLACEMENT TAX.; PROPERTY TAX.; SALES TAX.; TAXATION; DEFINITION.

Feb 3, 2004

An action by an ambulance district to impose a sales tax pursuant to Section 321.552, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2002, and make an accompanying reduction in its tax rate as defined in Section 137.073, RSMo 2000, thus setting that tax rate at zero, does not interfere with the district’s entitlement to revenue from the replacement tax imposed pursuant to Article X, Section 6 of the Missouri Constitution.

Open opinion ↗

Opinion No. 54-2004 — COUNTY LIBRARY DISTRICT.; COUNTY LIBRARY TAXES.; CONSOLIDATION OF DISTRICTS.; LIBRARY DISTRICTS.; LIBRARY TAXES.; REGIONAL LIBRARY DISTRICTS.

Feb 3, 2004

The “same rate of taxation” in Section 182.610, RSMo 2000, refers to the current rate of taxation actually in effect for each county library district that proposes to consolidate. Therefore, to consolidate pursuant to that statute, the county library districts must have the same current tax rate in effect. It is not sufficient that the districts previously had the same rate approved by voters in the past.

Open opinion ↗