Research About Meet PRIA

Support Data Sources Privacy Policy Terms of Servicehello@policyrisk.com

© 2026 PRIA Technologies, LLC. All rights reserved.

PRIA provides educational policy intelligence and is not a source of investment, legal, or financial advice. Content is for informational purposes only.

™

Your Policy Risk Impact Agent

Research

At My Address
Federal Courts
Daily Briefings
Medicare & Social Security
Policy Risk Index
Congressional Bills
Federal Register
Tariffs
Fed Decisions & The Economy
State Tracker
World Watch
U.S. Code
U.S. Constitution
Aliens

Knowledge

Search Polipedia
Daily Briefings
Calculators
Policy Risk Index
What is Policy Risk?
The Countdown

Company

About PRIA
Support

Get PRIA

Support Data Sources Privacy Policy Terms of Service

hello@policyrisk.com

© 2026 PRIA Technologies, LLC. All rights reserved.

PRIA is a trademark of PRIA Technologies, LLC.

PRIA provides educational policy intelligence and is not a source of investment, legal, or financial advice. Content is for informational purposes only.

Missouri Attorney General Opinions

™

Your Policy Risk Impact Agent

Missouri/AG Opinions

← All Missouri coverage

Missouri AG Opinions, 2003

7 opinions issued in 2003.

All years8,473 202016 2019272 2018116 2017476 2016283 2015337 20131 2011101 200968 200887 200740 200633 20058 20046 20037 200215 200165 200058 199943 199827 199722 199679 199522 199415 199335 199243 199168 199052 198948 198877 198788 198658 198572 198462 198371 198272 198191 1980134 1979121 1978104 1977136 1976148 1975152 1974212 1973193 1972171 1971279 1970107 1969291 1968192 1967182 1966215 1965200 1964248 1963203 1962184 196169 196047 195845 195761 195664 195579 195473 195379 195262 195173 195071 194871 194781 194681 194576 194468 194386 194285 194181 194080 193888 193786 193684 193591 193493 193393

7 opinions·Filtered by2003✕

Opinion No. 58-2003 — PRIVACY.; SECRETARY OF STATE.; SUNSHINE LAW.
Apr 23, 2003
There is no conflict between the provisions of Chapter 355, RSMo, requiring the release of addresses of members of not-for-profit corporations and the Federal Privacy Act.
Open opinion ↗
Opinion No. 37-2003 — JUVENILE COURT.; JUVENILES.; SUNSHINE LAW.
Feb 3, 2003
All identifiable information regarding a juvenile in records of a juvenile court proceeding must be kept confidential unless the specific instances set forth in Section 211.321 are met.
Open opinion ↗
Opinion No. 51-2003 — COMPETITIVE BIDDING.; COUNTY.; COUNTY COMMISSION.; JAIL.; SHERIFF.
Jan 31, 2003
Contracts subject to the provisions of Section 50.660, RSMo 2000, that are not let pursuant to those provisions are unenforceable against the county; however, the provider of the supplies, materials, or equipment has a cause of action for those obligations against the bond of the public official who acquired the supplies, materials, or equipment.
Open opinion ↗

Opinion No. 32-2003 — ANIMALS.; MUNICIPALITIES.; WILDLIFE.

Jan 31, 2003

Municipal animal pounds are only authorized to impound or harbor dogs and cats. Decompression is not a recommended method of euthanasia by the American Veterinary Medical Association's Panel on Euthanasia. Therefore, a municipal animal pound is not authorized to use a decompression chamber to euthanize wildlife.

Open opinion ↗

Opinion No. 15-2003 — BOARD FOR ARCHITECTS, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS.; LAND SURVEYORS.; RECORDER OF DEEDS.

Jan 31, 2003

A recorder of deeds shall accept for recordation land surveys prepared by a registered land surveyor that has either an embossed seal or a rubber stamp of the surveyor's seal.

Open opinion ↗

Opinion No. 88-2003 — INITIATIVE PETITION.

Jan 27, 2003

Review and approval pursuant to Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition relating to amending of Chapter 386 by modifying Section 386.887, the Consumer Clean Energy Act.

Open opinion ↗

Opinion No. 63-2003 — FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS.; FIRST CLASS COUNTIES.

Jan 7, 2003

Because the Sullivan Fire Protection District lies within Franklin County, which is a first class county with fewer than 900,000 inhabitants and borders three first class counties, and because Franklin County is a first class county without a charter form of government, which adjoins a first class county with a charter form of government with at least 900,000 inhabitants and adjoins at least four other counties, directors of that district may contemporaneously hold the position of director and hold a lucrative office or be employed by the state or a political subdivision thereof.

Open opinion ↗