8,473 official opinions issued by the Missouri Attorney General.
Opinion No. 22-87
Jan 27, 1987
Opinion letter to The Honorable Bob F. Griffin
Opinion No. 13-87 — ATTORNEYS.; BI-STATE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY.; CONFLICT OF INTEREST.; INCOMPATIBILITY OF OFFICES.; LEGISLATORS.
Jan 27, 1987
An attorney who is also a member of the General Assembly of the State of Missouri may not render legal services to the Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District because such would constitute “employment under … any municipality” of the State of Missouri and would be prohibited by Article , Section 12, Missouri Constitution.
Opinion No. 14-87
Jan 22, 1987
Opinion letter to The Honorable Merrill Townley
Opinion No. 61-87 — CITIES, TOWNS & VILLAGES.; CONSTITUTION.; CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.; FREEHOLDERS.; SAINT LOUIS CITY.
Jan 1, 1987
1. A board of freeholders organized under Article VI, Section 30(a), Missouri Constitution (as amended 1966) has the power to propose for a vote by the qualified electors of the City of St. Louis and St. Louis County a plan involving the disincorporation of existing municipalities and the incorporation of new municipalities provided the changes affect all or part of both the City of St. Louis and St. Louis County. 2. The people of the City of St. Louis and St. Louis County do not have the power under Article VI, Section 30(a) to enact a plan which consolidates municipalities in St. Louis County without providing for changes in all or part of the City of St. Louis. 3. The language in Article VI, Section 30(a) which provides “to establish a metropolitan district or districts for the functional administration of services common to the area included therein” does not authorize the board of freeholders to consolidate existing municipalities and incorporate new municipalities.