Critical US export controls for civil nuclear power projects
US export controls could restrict transfers of civil nuclear equipment and technology for power projects.
Source →The trace
How it reaches your house.
Starting from TENEX (JSC Techsnabexport), we walked the supply graph hop by hop to the goods you buy and the companies you own. Each step is the engine’s reasoning, scored for confidence and cited where a source backs it.
First impact
JSC TENEX (Rosatom State Atomic Energy Corporation) →Shortage riskLow-Enriched Uranium (LEU) Nuclear Fuel
TENEX is a major LEU supplier on this edge (35% share, 60-month replacement lead time, low substitutability), so export controls that curb Rosatom/TENEX civil-nuclear project activity would likely tighten LEU availability.
57% confidenceTENEX (JSC Techsnabexport) →Shortage riskLow-Enriched Uranium (LEU) Nuclear Fuel
TENEX supplies a sizable share of LEU and replacement is slow, so tighter nuclear trade controls can meaningfully constrain LEU availability.
44% confidenceConstellation Energy (Everett LNG) →Shortage riskHop 2
Low-Enriched Uranium (LEU) Nuclear Fuel →Prices riseLow-enriched uranium is a critical nuclear fuel input, so tighter supply would raise generation costs and likely push residential electricity prices higher even if the broader grid prevents immediate shortages.
74% confidenceLow-Enriched Uranium (LEU) Nuclear Fuel →Shortage riskThe U.S. supplies 10% of LEU, so a U.S. export-control tightening can directly curtail that slice of supply, though the market share is modest.
66% confidenceLow-Enriched Uranium (LEU) Nuclear Fuel →Prices rise