GOSAFE Act
Sponsored By: Senator Martin Heinrich
Introduced
Summary
This bill would create a federal framework that bans certain gas-operated semi-automatic firearms and most large-capacity ammunition feeding devices. It sets new definitions, criminal penalties, ATF design-approval rules, marking requirements, buy-back funding, and a prohibited-firearm list.
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
4 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 1 costs, 2 mixed.
Ban on gas-operated guns and magazines
If enacted, the bill would make it illegal to import, sell, make, transfer, receive, or possess many gas-operated semi-automatic firearms in interstate commerce. It would also bar magazines and similar feeding devices that hold or can be converted to hold more than 10 rounds. Violating the ban could bring fines up to $5,000 and up to 12 months in jail. If a person has a banned gun and commits another federal felony, they could face up to $250,000 in fines and 2 to 10 years in prison in addition to other penalties.
New approvals, fees, and dealer rules
If enacted, the Attorney General would publish a list of covered gas-operated guns within 180 days. Once published, licensed dealers would have to record a buyer's acknowledgment of that list before selling non-prohibited firearms. Any new semi-automatic design made after enactment would need Attorney General approval before manufacture and sale, and manufacturers must file detailed applications. The Attorney General must set manufacturer application fees within 60 days and create a trust fund for collected ATF taxes and fees. Denied manufacturers would have a 90-day appeal window and the Attorney General must decide appeals within 180 days.
Buy-back payments using Byrne grants
If enacted, Byrne grant funds could be used to pay people who surrender covered gas-operated firearms or large-capacity devices in buy-back programs. State and local governments would decide whether to run such buy-backs and how much to pay. The law would allow recipients to use Byrne money for these specific buy-back activities.
Exemptions and marking rules for makers
If enacted, the bill would exempt the United States, states, tribes, and certain Atomic Energy licensees and contractors from the bans for specific security and training uses. It would let people keep firearms lawfully made and transferred before enactment and allow some immediate family transfers under strict steps. Licensed importers and manufacturers would have to mark exempted firearms and may not remove or alter serial numbers before transfers.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Martin Heinrich
NM • D
Cosponsors
Angus King
ME • I
Sponsored 4/9/2025
Mark Kelly
AZ • D
Sponsored 4/9/2025
Michael Bennet
CO • D
Sponsored 4/9/2025
Timothy Kaine
VA • D
Sponsored 4/9/2025
Tammy Duckworth
IL • D
Sponsored 4/9/2025
Sheldon Whitehouse
RI • D
Sponsored 4/9/2025
Jeanne Shaheen
NH • D
Sponsored 4/9/2025
Alex Padilla
CA • D
Sponsored 4/9/2025
Chris Van Hollen
MD • D
Sponsored 4/9/2025
John Fetterman
PA • D
Sponsored 4/9/2025
Edward Markey
MA • D
Sponsored 4/9/2025
Ron Wyden
OR • D
Sponsored 4/9/2025
Mazie Hirono
HI • D
Sponsored 4/9/2025
Richard Durbin
IL • D
Sponsored 5/1/2025
Brian Schatz
HI • D
Sponsored 7/22/2025
Cory Booker
NJ • D
Sponsored 9/10/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
S1503 — Equality Act
Treat sexual orientation and gender identity as forms of sex discrimination across federal law. The bill would explicitly add sexual orientation and gender identity to federal sex‑discrimination protections and apply those rules across many statutes and programs.
S2295 — Child Care for Working Families Act
This bill creates a new, comprehensive federal entitlement for children from birth through five that guarantees access to affordable, high‑quality early care and learning. It pairs a universal preschool program with multi‑year grants to stabilize providers and new Head Start wage and expansion funding.
S852 — Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2025
Strengthens worker organizing rights and enforcement. The bill would expand who counts as employees and joint employers, speed representation and bargaining, require voter lists and workplace postings, and increase penalties and remedies for unfair labor practices. - Workers and jobseekers: Would broaden employee coverage and set a three-factor test that presumes employee status unless all three criteria are met. It would protect use of employer-provided electronic communications for organizing and clarify that the duration or pattern of strikes does not strip protection. - Employers and bargaining: Would require employers to provide unions detailed voter lists and timely notices. It would force a fast initial bargaining process with mandatory mediation and binding arbitration if negotiations fail. - Enforcement and remedies: Would expand National Labor Relations Board authority, allow private civil suits after a waiting period, make Board orders immediately effective, and raise civil penalties for unfair labor practices to up to $50,000 per violation and up to $100,000 for repeat or aggravated offenses.
S2150 — Women’s Health Protection Act of 2025
Guarantee nationwide protections for a person's right to obtain abortion services and a provider's right to deliver them. The Women's Health Protection Act of 2025 would create a federal rule that stops laws and rules that single out abortion or place heavier burdens on abortion than on similar medical procedures. It defines key terms, protects pre-viability care, allows post-viability care to protect life or health, and explicitly protects interstate travel and the movement of medicines, equipment, patients, and providers. - Families and patients: Would protect access to abortion before viability and allow post-viability care when needed to protect life or health. It would bar medically unnecessary in-person visit rules and stop forced disclosure of why a patient seeks care. - Health care providers: Would protect providers' ability to give abortion care including by telemedicine and across state lines, and would forbid facility, staffing, testing, or disclosure requirements that are not required for similar procedures. - States and interstate commerce: Would preempt conflicting state laws and recognize a right to travel and to assist others in getting reproductive health services across state lines. - Courts and enforcement: Would let the Attorney General sue and would create a private right of action so patients and providers can seek injunctive relief and attorney's fees. It would limit state sovereign immunity where federal law allows challenges.
S2523 — John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025
This bill would restore and strengthen federal voting-rights protections by rewriting Section 2, creating a practice-based preclearance process for certain election changes, and boosting transparency and enforcement. - Voters in racial, language-minority, and Tribal communities would gain broader legal standards to challenge discrimination. The bill would add distinct Section 2 tests for vote-dilution, vote-denial, and intentional discrimination and add a retrogression standard that applies to actions taken on or after 2021. - State and local election officials would face new preclearance and public-notice rules. Covered changes like election methods, redistricting shifts, ID rules, polling-place moves, and voter-list removals would need review before implementation and require pre-election notices 30 days before Federal elections with 48-hour updates. - The Department of Justice and private citizens would get stronger tools to enforce rights. The Attorney General would centralize observers, extend bilingual protections to 2037, seek preventive relief, issue pre-action information demands, and pursue expanded court remedies.
S1115 — Paycheck Fairness Act
Stronger enforcement against sex-based wage discrimination. This bill would tighten legal remedies, expand pay-data reporting, and fund training and grants to help close persistent pay gaps between men and women. - Workers: Would expand protections so employees can discuss pay without retaliation and pursue compensatory and, for willful misconduct, punitive damages. It also narrows the employer "bona fide factor" defense so pay differences must be job-related and business-necessary. - Employers: Private firms with 100 or more employees would face new pay-data reporting requirements by sex, race, and ethnicity and public disclosure of aggregated results by industry, occupation, and metro area. - Federal contractors and agencies: The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs would restart and expand contractor pay surveys and must annually select not less than half of nonconstruction contractor establishments to report. The Bureau of Labor Statistics would continue tracking women in its employment survey. - Training, grants, and outreach: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and OFCCP must receive training funded by appropriations. A new competitive Negotiation Skills Training grant program would fund entities to teach pay negotiation and report on outcomes.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Start a Free Government Policy Watch to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.
Already have an account? Sign in