All Roll Calls
Yes: 354 • No: 0
Sponsored By: Diane Blair-Sherlock (Democratic)
Became Law
Personalized for You
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
2 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.
Courts must dismiss a guardianship case when the legal basis is not proven. If a person lacks some, but not all, decision-making ability, the court appoints a limited guardian for the person, the estate, or both, and writes the facts and the guardian’s duties and powers. If the person is totally without capacity and a limited guardian is not enough, the court appoints a plenary guardian and states the reasons in writing. When choosing a guardian, the court considers the person’s wishes and the guardian’s qualifications, with the person’s best interests and well-being first. The court can name different people for the person and the estate and must write down the factual basis for its choice.
Beginning January 1, 2024, the State Guardian offers courts a free training program with two parts: caring for a person and managing an estate. The caring part covers Alzheimer’s and dementia, including how to communicate, interact, and support a person’s rights. Guardians of the person must complete approved training and file a certificate within one year of getting letters of guardianship. A chief judge can approve a similar program from another provider. Employees of the Office of the State Guardian, public guardians, licensed attorneys, corporate fiduciaries, and people certified by the Center for Guardianship Certification are exempt; courts may also grant an exemption for good cause shown by affidavit. The State Guardian sets content after consulting courts, guardianship groups, advocates, and people with lived experience, and works to make materials accessible.
Diane Blair-Sherlock
Democratic • House
Bob Morgan
Democratic • House
Laura Fine
Democratic • Senate
Terra Costa Howard
Democratic • House
All Roll Calls
Yes: 354 • No: 0
House vote • 5/30/2025
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 House Concurs
Yes: 116 • No: 0
House vote • 5/29/2025
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Recommends Be Adopted Judiciary - Civil Committee;
Yes: 18 • No: 0
Senate vote • 5/21/2025
Third Reading - Passed;
Yes: 58 • No: 0
Senate vote • 5/8/2025
Do Pass as Amended Judiciary;
Yes: 9 • No: 0
House vote • 4/9/2025
Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed
Yes: 114 • No: 0
House vote • 4/9/2025
House Floor Amendment No. 2 Recommends Be Adopted Judiciary - Civil Committee;
Yes: 20 • No: 0
House vote • 3/12/2025
Do Pass / Short Debate Judiciary - Civil Committee;
Yes: 19 • No: 0
Public Act . . . . . . . . . 104-0237
Effective Date January 1, 2026
Governor Approved
Sent to the Governor
Passed Both Houses
House Concurs
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 House Concurs 116-000-000
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Recommends Be Adopted Judiciary - Civil Committee; 018-000-000
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Rules Referred to Judiciary - Civil Committee
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Referred to Rules Committee
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion Filed Concur Rep. Diane Blair-Sherlock
Placed on Calendar Order of Concurrence Senate Amendment(s) 1
Arrived in House
Third Reading - Passed; 058-000-000
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading May 15, 2025
Second Reading
Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading May 13, 2025
Do Pass as Amended Judiciary; 009-000-000
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Assignments Refers to Judiciary
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Assignments
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Laura Fine
Postponed - Judiciary
Assigned to Judiciary
Referred to Assignments
Engrossed
Enrolled
House Amendment 1
House Amendment 2
Introduced
Senate Amendment 1