All Roll Calls
Yes: 177 • No: 21
Sponsored By: Kimberly A. Lightford (Democratic)
Became Law
Personalized for You
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
6 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 1 costs, 2 mixed.
Starting July 1, 2025, after your district’s evaluation system is in place, a district may skip a second remediation and seek dismissal if you are tenured, finished a remediation after an Unsatisfactory overall rating, and then get another Unsatisfactory overall rating within 36 months. This speeds up dismissal for repeat Unsatisfactory ratings.
Beginning July 1, 2025, you can seek court review of a dismissal under the Administrative Review Law. In districts with 500,000 or more people—and in smaller districts when the hearing officer recommended dismissal—you must file directly in the appellate court within 35 days after service. The court can reverse only if the decision is arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or not in accordance with law. You must pay the costs to prepare and file the record. If you win, the court sends the case back to order back pay, and you can use expedited arbitration to challenge the board’s back‑pay order; the board pays the arbitration costs.
Beginning July 1, 2025, a district may choose an optional process to dismiss a tenured teacher after an "Unsatisfactory" PERA evaluation and completed remediation. The hearing focuses on three issues: correct use of evaluation components, whether the remediation plan met the law, and whether the teacher failed remediation. Each side usually has two days to present evidence, and the hearing officer must finish a recommendation in 30 days. Only PERA‑trained board members may vote, and the board must decide within 45 days of the recommendation. If the board keeps the teacher, it must order back pay and lost benefits within 45 days, subject to mitigation. If the board dismisses against a retention recommendation, it must give written reasons. A board cannot waive its right to dismiss under this process by agreement.
Starting July 1, 2025, districts that use the optional process must keep a list of at least two second evaluators before the first remediation. Teacher representatives can submit names within 21 days, up to the district’s number unless the district agrees to more. Each second evaluator must be National Board certified with strong recent ratings, or be a highly rated evaluator (two "Excellent" ratings in the last three with no low ratings). The district and teacher representatives set a selection process, but the district makes the pick. The second evaluator cannot be the original rater or that person’s direct report, and must do mid‑point and final checks or an independent assessment with observations.
Until July 1, 2025, principal and assistant principal evaluations must treat student growth as a significant factor. Starting July 1, 2025, evaluations may include student growth as a factor, but it is no longer required to be significant. This applies to districts outside Article 34.
Starting July 1, 2025, your district may include student growth as a factor in teacher evaluations only if a joint committee with equal district and teacher members agrees. If there is no agreement within 180 days, the district must use the State Board’s model plan for student growth. Before July 1, 2025, student growth is a significant factor under prior rules.
Kimberly A. Lightford
Democratic • Senate
Jawaharial Williams
Democratic • House
Lakesia Collins
Democratic • Senate
Laura Faver Dias
Democratic • House
Martha Deuter
Democratic • House
Meg Loughran Cappel
Democratic • Senate
Michael Crawford
Democratic • House
Nicolle Grasse
Democratic • House
Paul Faraci
Democratic • Senate
All Roll Calls
Yes: 177 • No: 21
House vote • 5/20/2025
Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed
Yes: 92 • No: 21
House vote • 4/23/2025
Do Pass / Short Debate Elementary & Secondary Education: Administration, Licensing & Charter Schools;
Yes: 7 • No: 0
Senate vote • 4/3/2025
Third Reading - Passed;
Yes: 54 • No: 0
Senate vote • 2/26/2025
Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Recommend Do Adopt Education;
Yes: 14 • No: 0
Senate vote • 2/5/2025
Do Pass Education;
Yes: 10 • No: 0
Public Act . . . . . . . . . 104-0020
Effective Date July 1, 2025
Governor Approved
Sent to the Governor
Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Jawaharial Williams
Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Michael Crawford
Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Martha Deuter
Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Nicolle Grasse
Passed Both Houses
Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 092-021-000
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
Second Reading - Short Debate
Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
Do Pass / Short Debate Elementary & Secondary Education: Administration, Licensing & Charter Schools; 007-000-000
Assigned to Elementary & Secondary Education: Administration, Licensing & Charter Schools
Referred to Rules Committee
First Reading
Chief House Sponsor Rep. Laura Faver Dias
Arrived in House
Added as Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Lakesia Collins
Third Reading - Passed; 054-000-000
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading March 6, 2025
Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Adopted; Lightford
Second Reading
Added as Co-Sponsor Sen. Paul Faraci
Engrossed
Enrolled
Introduced
Senate Amendment 1