KansasSB 2412025–2026 Regular SessionSenateWALLET

Providing that restrictive covenants in certain contracts are enforceable and not considered a restraint of trade in certain circumstances.

Sponsored By: Sponsor information unavailable

Signed by Governor

judiciary

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

4 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 1 costs, 2 mixed.

Tougher non-solicit rules for owners

Written non-solicit promises by owners are presumed enforceable. A promise not to recruit a company’s employees or owners can last up to four years after the ownership ends. A promise not to contact the company’s customers is enforceable only for customers the owner had material contact with, and for no more than four years. A written promise to give advance notice before selling or ending an ownership stake is also enforceable. These rules protect a company’s staff and customers, but they can limit an owner’s actions after leaving.

Some industries exempt from restraint law

The law exempts some groups from the Kansas restraint of trade act. These include cooperative marketing groups, Capper-Volstead farm associations, certain electric cooperatives and wholesale providers owned by multiple cooperatives, credit union associations, entities under the Packers and Stockyards Act, and franchise agreements and covenants not to compete. These arrangements are not treated as unlawful restraints under state law.

Stronger non-solicit rules for workers

Written non-solicit promises between an employer and an employee are easier to enforce. A ban on recruiting a company’s employees or owners is presumed valid if it protects trade secrets, confidential info, or goodwill, or if it lasts no more than two years after the job ends. A ban on contacting customers is presumed valid if it is limited to customers the worker had material contact with and lasts no more than two years. These rules make some post-job limits on workers easier to enforce.

New court rules on covenants and antitrust

Courts judge restraints by what is reasonable under all the facts and cannot allow restraints that harm public welfare. If a covenant is too broad or not needed, the court must narrow it and enforce only what is reasonably necessary. Employees and owners can still raise any legal or fairness defenses, and existing private suits and attorney general actions remain. Kansas follows U.S. Supreme Court antitrust rulings, except the new subsection (c) rules control if there is a conflict. The law defines key terms and replaces the prior version of K.S.A. 50-163.

Sponsors & Cosponsors

Sponsors

There is no primary sponsor on record.

Cosponsors

There are no cosponsors for this bill.

Roll Call Votes

All Roll Calls

Yes: 179 • No: 17

Senate vote 4/23/2026

Yea: 38 Nay: 0

Yes: 38 • No: 0

Senate vote 4/23/2026

Yea: 101 Nay: 17

Yes: 101 • No: 17

Senate vote 4/23/2026

Yea: 40 Nay: 0

Yes: 40 • No: 0

Actions Timeline

  1. Enrolled and presented to Governor on Friday, April 4, 2025

    4/10/2025Senate
  2. Approved by Governor on Tuesday, April 8, 2025

    4/10/2025Senate
  3. Concurred with amendments; Yea: 38 Nay: 0

    3/25/2025Senate
  4. Committee of the Whole - Committee Report be adopted

    3/20/2025House
  5. Committee of the Whole - Be passed as amended

    3/20/2025House
  6. Emergency Final Action - Passed as amended; Yea: 101 Nay: 17

    3/20/2025House
  7. Committee Report recommending bill be passed as amended by Committee on Judiciary

    3/19/2025House
  8. Hearing: Thursday, February 27, 2025, 3:30 PM Room 582-N

    2/27/2025House
  9. Received and Introduced

    2/20/2025House
  10. Referred to Committee on Judiciary

    2/20/2025House
  11. Committee of the Whole - Be passed

    2/19/2025Senate
  12. Emergency Final Action - Passed; Yea: 40 Nay: 0

    2/19/2025Senate
  13. Committee Report recommending bill be passed by Committee on Judiciary

    2/17/2025Senate
  14. Hearing: Friday, February 14, 2025, 10:30 AM Room 346-S

    2/14/2025Senate
  15. Referred to Committee on Judiciary

    2/7/2025Senate
  16. Introduced

    2/6/2025Senate

Bill Text

  • As Amended by House Committee

  • As introduced

  • Enrolled

Related Bills

Back to State Legislation