Title 42 › Chapter 129— NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE › Subchapter I— NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE STATE GRANT PROGRAM › § 12639
The Corporation must run regular evaluations of programs that get national service money. The reviews must check how well programs meet their goals and how much they cost. They must also look at how services are delivered (for example, how participants’ time is used, how participants are managed, and how easy it is for people to get services). Where useful, evaluations should compare program participants with similar people who did not join. Independent reviewers who are not running the program must do the work. The Corporation must create and publish basic rules for these evaluations, ask participants and community members for their views, and compare different program types (full- and part-time, different service types, recruitment methods, benefit options, and individual versus team placements). For programs under division C, evaluations must check nine goals, including recruiting diverse participants, helping participants get more education, encouraging service after the program, building civic attitudes, reducing student loan need, providing community benefits, matching volunteer help to agency capacity, not replacing paid workers, and bringing more people into service. The Corporation can require participants and applicants to give information but must keep personal information private unless the person agrees in writing; it may share only summary data. Each year the Corporation must arrange an independent evaluation that reports participant demographics, total participants (by state and other categories), and how grant funds were spent; the first such report for the year beginning September 21, 1993 was due within 18 months after that date, and later yearly reports are due within 18 months after the start of each year. The Corporation may set aside up to 1 percent of certain appropriated funds each year to pay for accountability work. It must set performance targets with grant recipients and use measures like enrollment and completion, volunteers recruited, people served, disadvantaged youth served, program sustainability and community support, changes in civic attitudes, and other agreed measures. Programs that miss targets must make corrective plans. Newer programs (under 3 years) get technical help and must send quarterly progress reports; older programs must send quarterly reports. If a program still fails after the correction period, the Corporation must cut its grant by at least 25 percent each remaining year or end funding. Starting not later than two years after April 21, 2009, and every year after, the Corporation must report to the authorizing congressional committees with counts of programs under corrective plans, those getting technical help, those whose funding was ended, rejected applicants, and recipients meeting or exceeding their targets.
Full Legal Text
The Public Health and Welfare — Source: USLM XML via OLRC
Legislative History
Reference
Citation
42 U.S.C. § 12639
Title 42 — The Public Health and Welfare
Last Updated
Apr 5, 2026
Release point: 119-73not60