All Roll Calls
Yes: 107 • No: 88
Sponsored By: Senator Johnson, Ron [R-WI]
In Committee
This bill would ensure that excepted federal employees continue to receive their normal pay and benefits during government funding gaps. It authorizes temporary Treasury funding to pay standard rates of pay, allowances, pay differentials, benefits, and other regular payments for excepted work starting in fiscal year 2026.
Personalized for You
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
2 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.
If enacted, agencies would get Treasury money to pay covered workers during funding lapses starting in fiscal year 2026. You would be paid normal pay, differentials, allowances, and benefits if your agency designates you as excepted. Contractors required to work during a lapse and active-duty military would also be paid for that work. The funds would be “such sums as are necessary” from the Treasury until Congress passes appropriations for that agency for the fiscal year. The bill would take effect as if enacted on September 30, 2025.
If enacted, agency heads could not use the temporary pay authority while a continuing appropriation is in effect for the same purpose. The temporary authority would end when Congress enacts final or continuing appropriations for that fiscal year, whether those appropriations include these payments or not. Any spending made under the temporary authority must be charged to the regular agency appropriation once that law passes. This changes how agencies may obligate and account for shutdown pay.
Johnson, Ron [R-WI]
WI • R
Sen. Budd, Ted [R-NC]
NC • R
Sponsored 10/15/2025
Sen. Cassidy, Bill [R-LA]
LA • R
Sponsored 10/15/2025
Sen. Crapo, Mike [R-ID]
ID • R
Sponsored 10/15/2025
Sen. Cotton, Tom [R-AR]
AR • R
Sponsored 10/15/2025
Sen. Risch, James E. [R-ID]
ID • R
Sponsored 10/15/2025
Sen. Sullivan, Dan [R-AK]
AK • R
Sponsored 10/15/2025
Sen. Young, Todd [R-IN]
IN • R
Sponsored 10/15/2025
Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT]
UT • R
Sponsored 10/20/2025
Sen. Barrasso, John [R-WY]
WY • R
Sponsored 10/20/2025
Sen. Hoeven, John [R-ND]
ND • R
Sponsored 10/20/2025
Sen. McCormick, David [R-PA]
PA • R
Sponsored 10/20/2025
Sen. Scott, Rick [R-FL]
FL • R
Sponsored 10/21/2025
Sen. Lankford, James [R-OK]
OK • R
Sponsored 10/22/2025
All Roll Calls
Yes: 107 • No: 88
senate vote • 11/7/2025
On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed S. 3012
Yes: 53 • No: 43
senate vote • 10/23/2025
On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed S. 3012
Yes: 54 • No: 45
S3752, SAVE America Act
Would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship and a tangible photo ID to register and vote in federal elections. It would create a nationwide verification system using DHS SAVE, Social Security Administration checks, and state DMV and other databases and would expand removal rules, private lawsuits, and criminal penalties for registration violations. - Voters and registrants: People seeking to register for federal office would need to present listed documents such as a U.S. passport, REAL ID showing citizenship, naturalization certificate, or certified birth records. Those without documents could use a uniform affidavit under penalty of perjury as an alternative. - State and election agencies: Motor vehicle agencies and voter registration offices would have to collect and verify documentary proof and regularly cross-check SAVE, SSA, and state records. Federal departments would be required to provide verification data on request and, where practicable, within 24 hours to support verification. - Voting process and enforcement: In-person voters would need a tangible photo ID and absentee voters would include an ID copy with requests and ballots. The bill would add a mechanism to remove registrants verified as noncitizens and broaden private rights of action and criminal penalties for assisting improper registration.
S186, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2025
Blocks federal funding for abortions and for health plans that cover abortion. The bill would permanently ban the use of federal funds for abortions or for any health plan paid for in whole or in part with federal money and would bar abortions in federal facilities or by federal employees. - Families and marketplace enrollees would not be able to use premium tax credits or cost‑sharing reductions to buy plans that include abortion. They could purchase a separate abortion-only plan but would receive no federal subsidy for that coverage. - People who receive care in federal facilities and anyone served by federal employees would not get abortions paid for with federal funds. The bill extends funding restrictions to federal trust funds and the District of Columbia. Exceptions are preserved for rape, incest, and life‑threatening conditions. - Employers and insurers would face new rules. Plans that include abortion would be excluded from the small employer health insurance credit. Qualified health plans and marketplace materials would have to prominently disclose whether they cover abortion and any separate surcharge for that coverage.
S6, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
This bill would require health care practitioners to give the same standard of care and immediate hospital admission for infants born alive after an abortion. It would also create mandatory reporting rules and civil and criminal penalties for failures. - Health care practitioners: Would have to provide the same professional care any newborn at the same gestational age would receive and ensure immediate hospital admission. Violations can lead to fines or up to 5 years in prison. - Clinic and hospital staff: Anyone who knows a practitioner failed to meet the care rules must immediately report that failure to state or federal law enforcement. - Mothers: The woman on whom the abortion was performed could not be prosecuted under this law and may sue providers for violations. - Civil remedies: A successful suit can win verifiable damages for injuries, punitive damages, and statutory damages equal to three times the cost of the abortion. - Homicide exposure: Intentionally killing or attempting to kill an infant born alive would be prosecuted as murder.
S128, SAVE Act
Requires documentary proof of U.S. citizenship for federal voter registration. This bill would bar states from processing any application for a federal election unless the applicant presents specified citizenship documents and would add verification, information-sharing, removal, and enforcement rules to the voter registration system. - Prospective voters: People applying to register for a federal election would need to present specified documentary proof of U.S. citizenship when they apply, whether by mail, online, in person, or at the polling place. States must provide an alternate uniform affidavit under penalty of perjury for applicants who cannot produce documents. - State agencies and driver license offices: States would be required to verify citizenship during driver’s license issuance or renewal and to link those checks to voter registration records. The bill would require states to create programs to identify and remove noncitizens and sets implementation timing, including a 30-day program deadline and a 60-day early-adoption window. - Election officials, enforcement, and naturalization: The bill would expand criminal penalties and create a private right of action against officials who register applicants without required proof. It also directs the Department of Homeland Security to notify state election officials of naturalizations and preserves the ability to cast provisional ballots while citizenship is verified.
S65, Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025
Creates nationwide concealed-carry reciprocity for qualified permit holders. The bill would let people who are federally eligible to possess firearms and who carry a photo ID plus a valid state concealed-carry permit, or who are eligible to carry in their home State, carry a concealed handgun in other States that allow resident permits or do not prohibit resident concealed carry. - Nonresidents who meet federal eligibility and permit rules would be subject to the same conditions and limits that apply to resident permit holders in the destination State. This means where and how they may carry will follow the destination State's rules. - Preserves State control over who gets a concealed-carry permit while requiring that, in States that allow restricted permits, a nonresident carrying under this law be treated under the same terms as an unrestricted resident permit. - Federal prohibitions still bar certain people from carrying, and the reciprocity excludes machineguns and destructive devices. - The changes would take effect 90 days after enactment.
S5, Laken Riley Act
Mandatory detention for certain theft-related offenses. The law requires the Department of Homeland Security to detain non-U.S. nationals who are unlawfully present or lack proper admission documents and who are charged with, arrested for, convicted of, or admit to burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting. - Non-U.S. nationals: Individuals charged with those offenses can be held, designated as inadmissible when seeking admission, and are subject to a DHS detainer. If not already detained by federal, state, or local officials, DHS must effectively and expeditiously take custody. - States: State attorneys general and other authorized state officers may sue the Secretary of Homeland Security in federal court for injunctive relief when a federal decision or alleged failure causes harm to the state or its residents, including financial harm over $100, and such suits can receive expedited docketing where harm exists. - Federal enforcement and courts: The law codifies a DHS detainer mechanism, emphasizes DHS authority over parole and detention language, and creates a limited set of exceptions governing when injunctive relief is available to states.
Surfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph, ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.
Would block federal eminent domain for most agricultural land when a feasible alternative exists, defines covered land, and excludes tiny low‑income parcels.
Federal homeless assistance — primarily funded through the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act 1987 42 U.S.C. §§ 11301–11473 and administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD
Federal identity theft law criminalizes the fraudulent creation, transfer, and use of identification documents and personal identifying information. The two primary statutes — 18 U.S.C. § 1028 identif
The U.S. Department of Labor is revising its implementing regulations for Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (Section 503). The revisions align the regulations with applicable law and recent executive orders, including Executive Order 14173, "Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity," and Executive Order 14219, "Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's `Department of Government Efficiency' Deregulatory Initiative."
“Bill HR10135 contains provision HR10135::prov_1”
Dependency and Indemnity Compensation DIC is a tax-free monthly payment from the VA to surviving spouses, dependent children, and in some cases parents of veterans who died from a service-connected co