DelawareSS 1 for SB 21153rd General Assembly (2024–2026)Senate

AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 8 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO THE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW.

Sponsored By: Bryan Townsend (Democratic)

Signed by Governor

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

6 provisions identified: 2 benefits, 1 costs, 3 mixed.

Directors can inspect broader company records

Directors can inspect the company’s stock ledger, stockholder list, books, and other corporate records. Their purpose must reasonably relate to their role as directors. The Court of Chancery alone decides disputes over this access. The company must prove that a challenged inspection has an improper purpose.

Stockholders can seek additional company records

The Court of Chancery can order substitute records when a company lacks certain required records. These include board or committee minutes and actions, financial statements, and independence questionnaires. Substitutes must be necessary and essential to the stockholder’s proper purpose. For records beyond the statutory list, stockholders must meet the inspection requirements and show a compelling need. They must also prove, with clear and convincing evidence, that the specific records are necessary and essential; reasonable restrictions can apply. These routes take effect upon enactment and exclude inspection demands made on or before February 17, 2025.

Investors lose some controlling-owner damage claims

Stockholders cannot collect monetary damages from controlling stockholders or control-group members solely for breaching the duty of care. This protection applies when those owners act in their controlling-owner role. It does not cover loyalty breaches, bad faith, intentional misconduct, knowing law violations, or improper personal benefits. The rule takes effect upon enactment and covers earlier and later acts. It excludes court cases completed or pending on or before February 17, 2025.

Company insiders gain shields against lawsuits

The law protects directors and officers from damages and court-ordered relief over qualifying deals involving their own interests. A deal qualifies through informed approval by disinterested directors, informed and unpressured stockholder approval, or fairness to the company and stockholders. Director approval requires a majority of disinterested directors serving, acting in good faith and without gross negligence. If most directors are not disinterested, the director-approval route requires a committee of at least 2 disinterested directors. Interested directors can count toward a quorum, and disinterested directors can approve even without making up a quorum. At exchange-listed companies, directors the board finds independent under exchange rules are presumed disinterested; rebuttal requires substantial, specific evidence of a material interest or relationship. Nomination by an interested person alone does not prove a director has a conflict. The amendments take effect upon enactment and cover earlier and later acts, but exclude court cases completed or pending and inspection demands made on or before February 17, 2025.

Controlling owners gain deal lawsuit protections

Qualifying deals involving controlling stockholders or control groups are protected from damages and court-ordered relief against covered participants. For deals that do not take the company private, one route is enough: committee approval, disinterested-stockholder approval, or fairness. The committee needs at least 2 disinterested directors and authority to negotiate or oversee negotiations and reject the deal. Members must know the material facts, and a majority must approve or recommend the deal in good faith without gross negligence. The stockholder route requires the deal to be conditioned on an informed, unpressured majority of votes cast by disinterested stockholders. Going-private deals need both approval routes, or must be fair to the company and stockholders. Controlling-stockholder tests cover majority voting power, director-election rights, or at least one-third voting power plus the required managerial authority, including affiliates and associates. Going-private deals include covered federal securities transactions and, for other companies, deals eliminating all or nearly all disinterested stockholders’ shares. The rules take effect upon enactment and cover past and future acts, excluding court cases completed or pending by February 17, 2025. Common-law duties and remedies, including fairness review and claims for helping a breach, remain subject to the statutory protections.

Stockholders get defined records with limits

The law lists company records stockholders can request, including the charter, bylaws, board and committee minutes, and board materials. It also includes stockholder meeting minutes and written consents, stockholder communications, and annual financial statements from the preceding 3 years. Covered records also include specified company agreements and director and officer independence questionnaires. Requests must be made in good faith, clearly describe the purpose and records, and seek records specifically tied to that purpose. The purpose must reasonably relate to the requester’s interest as a stockholder. Beneficial owners must document ownership and certify a true copy; agents or attorneys need written authorization. Companies can impose reasonable confidentiality, use, and sharing limits and remove material unrelated to the stated purpose. Produced information is treated as part of related complaints based on that information. The Court of Chancery alone decides inspection disputes and can order inspection, copies, or extracts. The amendments take effect upon enactment and do not apply to demands made on or before February 17, 2025.

Sponsors & Cosponsors

Sponsor

  • Bryan Townsend

    Democratic • Senate

Cosponsors

  • Timothy D. Dukes

    Republican • House

  • Krista Griffith

    Democratic • House

  • Kerri Evelyn Harris

    Democratic • House

  • Gerald W. Hocker

    Republican • Senate

  • Russell Huxtable

    Democratic • Senate

  • S. Elizabeth Lockman

    Democratic • Senate

  • Melissa Minor-Brown

    Democratic • House

  • Edward S. Osienski

    Democratic • House

  • Brian Pettyjohn

    Republican • Senate

  • Ray Seigfried

    Democratic • Senate

  • David P. Sokola

    Democratic • Senate

  • Jeffrey N. Spiegelman

    Republican • House

Roll Call Votes

All Roll Calls

Yes: 52 • No: 7

House vote • 3/25/2025

Passed (2/3 required)

Yes: 32 • No: 7

Senate vote • 3/13/2025

Passed (2/3 required)

Yes: 20 • No: 0

Actions Timeline

  1. Signed by Governor

    3/25/2025Governor
  2. Passed By House. Votes: 32 YES 7 NO 2 ABSENT

    3/25/2025House
  3. Amendment HA 7 to SS 1 - Defeated By House. Votes: 8 YES 31 NO 2 ABSENT

    3/25/2025House
  4. Amendment HA 6 to SS 1 - Stricken in House

    3/25/2025House
  5. Amendment HA 5 to SS 1 - Defeated By House. Votes: 8 YES 31 NO 2 ABSENT

    3/25/2025House
  6. Amendment HA 4 to SS 1 - Defeated By House. Votes: 8 YES 31 NO 2 ABSENT

    3/25/2025House
  7. Amendment HA 3 to SS 1 - Defeated By House. Votes: 9 YES 30 NO 2 ABSENT

    3/25/2025House
  8. Amendment HA 2 to SS 1 - Defeated By House. Votes: 6 YES 32 NO 1 NOT VOTING 2 ABSENT

    3/25/2025House
  9. Amendment HA 1 to SS 1 - Stricken in House

    3/25/2025House
  10. Amendment HA 2 to SS 1 - Introduced and Placed With Bill

    3/25/2025Senate
  11. Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in House with 9 On Its Merits

    3/19/2025House
  12. Amendment HA 1 to SS 1 - Introduced and Placed With Bill

    3/18/2025Senate
  13. Assigned to Judiciary Committee in House

    3/13/2025House
  14. Passed By Senate. Votes: 20 YES 1 ABSENT

    3/13/2025Senate
  15. Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in Senate with 2 Favorable, 2 On Its Merits

    3/12/2025Senate
  16. Adopted in lieu of the original bill SB 21, and Assigned to Judiciary Committee in Senate

    3/12/2025Senate

Bill Text

  • Current

    3/12/2025

Related Bills

Back to State Legislation