UtahS.B. 2922026 General SessionSenate

Autonomous Systems Amendments

Sponsored By: Kirk A. Cullimore (Republican)

Signed by Governor

Judicial OperationsLegislative OperationsSunsets and RepealersMotor VehiclesTransportationAutonomous VehiclesCivil Procedure

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

4 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 2 costs, 1 mixed.

Fewer claim options for automated-driving victims

Beginning May 6, 2026, Level 4 or 5 system makers and developers are shielded from negligence claims for covered injuries, deaths, and property damage. The shield applies while the system is engaged in an equipped or dedicated vehicle. Negligent design, development, testing, manufacture, and deployment claims instead count as product-liability claims; product-liability and separate driverless-operation claims remain available. A claimant's own fault can reduce recovery. Punitive damages—money meant to punish wrongdoing—are barred in Level 4 or 5 cases under Utah's liability-limits chapter.

Tougher defect cases for automated-driving victims

Beginning May 6, 2026, victims alleging Level 4 or 5 operating defects must prove two points as more likely than not. A reasonable, workable alternative design existed when the system was designed and made, and the system causes more injuries overall than humans doing similar tasks. Systems are presumed defect-free if they met federal safety, bumper, and theft-prevention standards at manufacture and were authorized in Utah; victims can challenge that presumption. Makers and developers can defeat design, manufacturing, or warning claims by showing compliance with scientific and technical knowledge and circumstances at manufacture, or fewer injuries overall than humans doing the same activity. The law repeals that defense on July 1, 2030.

Safety and operating rules for automated vehicles

Beginning May 6, 2026, Utah defines automated vehicles using Level 3–5 categories from an April 2021 industry standard. Dedicated driverless vehicles must be designed exclusively for Level 4 or 5 operation within their system's operating limits. Automated driving systems must meet federal vehicle safety, bumper, and theft-prevention standards in effect when the vehicle is made. When engaged in an equipped vehicle, the system counts as the operator and is responsible for lawful operation. The system does not need an operator license.

Automated-driving liability protections end in 2030

On July 1, 2030, the law repeals Utah's special liability limits for automated vehicles, including the negligence shield and punitive-damages ban. It also repeals specified automated-driving definitions, special product-defect rules, and the defense based on knowledge at manufacture or lower overall injuries. This ends those limits on victims' claims and those protections for makers and other covered defendants.

Sponsors & Cosponsors

Sponsor

  • Kirk A. Cullimore

    Republican • Senate

Cosponsors

  • Jordan D. Teuscher

    Republican • House

Roll Call Votes

All Roll Calls

Yes: 149 • No: 26

Senate vote • 3/6/2026

Senate/ concurs with House amendment

Yes: 24 • No: 2

House vote • 3/6/2026

House/ passed 3rd reading

Yes: 55 • No: 15

House vote • 3/4/2026

House Comm - Substitute Recommendation

Yes: 10 • No: 0

House vote • 3/4/2026

House Comm - Favorable Recommendation

Yes: 9 • No: 1

Senate vote • 3/2/2026

Senate/ circled

Yes: 0 • No: 0

Senate vote • 3/2/2026

Senate/ uncircled

Yes: 0 • No: 0

Senate vote • 3/2/2026

Senate/ passed 3rd reading

Yes: 21 • No: 5

Senate vote • 2/27/2026

Senate/ passed 2nd reading

Yes: 24 • No: 3

Senate vote • 2/27/2026

Senate/ uncircled

Yes: 0 • No: 0

Senate vote • 2/27/2026

Senate/ substituted

Yes: 0 • No: 0

Senate vote • 2/27/2026

Senate/ circled

Yes: 0 • No: 0

Senate vote • 2/20/2026

Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation

Yes: 6 • No: 0

Actions Timeline

  1. Governor Signed

    3/23/2026
  2. Senate/ to Governor

    3/13/2026Senate
  3. Senate/ received enrolled bill from Printing

    3/13/2026Senate
  4. Senate/ enrolled bill to Printing

    3/12/2026Senate
  5. Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate

    3/12/2026
  6. Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared

    3/10/2026
  7. Bill Received from Senate for Enrolling

    3/10/2026
  8. Senate/ signed by President/ sent for enrolling

    3/6/2026Senate
  9. Senate/ received from House

    3/6/2026Senate
  10. House/ to Senate

    3/6/2026House
  11. House/ signed by Speaker/ returned to Senate

    3/6/2026House
  12. House/ received from Senate

    3/6/2026House
  13. Senate/ to House

    3/6/2026Senate
  14. Senate/ concurs with House amendment

    3/6/2026Senate
  15. Senate/ placed on Concurrence Calendar

    3/6/2026Senate
  16. Senate/ received from House

    3/6/2026Senate
  17. House/ to Senate

    3/6/2026House
  18. House/ passed 3rd reading

    3/6/2026House
  19. House/ 3rd reading

    3/6/2026House
  20. House/ Rules to 3rd Reading Calendar

    3/5/2026House
  21. House/ 3rd Reading Calendar to Rules

    3/4/2026House
  22. House/ 2nd reading

    3/4/2026House
  23. House/ comm rpt/ substituted

    3/4/2026House
  24. House Comm - Favorable Recommendation

    3/4/2026
  25. House Comm - Substitute Recommendation

    3/4/2026

Bill Text

  • Enrolled

    3/12/2026

  • Substitute #2

    3/4/2026

  • Substitute #1

    2/26/2026

  • Introduced

    2/12/2026

Related Bills

Back to State Legislation