Event Contract Enforcement Act
Sponsored By: Representative Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1]
In Committee
Summary
This bill would bar exchanges from listing or trading event-based contracts that bet on unlawful or sensitive real-world happenings, while letting States opt out of the gaming ban. It targets agreements, contracts, transactions, or swaps in excluded commodities that are based on the occurrence or extent of certain events or contingencies and sets a 180-day implementation window after enactment.
Show full summary
- Registered exchanges and market operators would be prohibited from offering contracts tied to things like unlawful activity, terrorism, assassination, war, election results, or government conduct. This removes a pathway for those specific event wagers on regulated platforms.
- Creators and sellers of event contracts would lose access to regulated trading venues for products tied directly to the listed occurrences. That limits where these products can be marketed and traded.
- States can exempt themselves from the gaming prohibition by passing a clear state law that allows the conduct. This preserves state-level choices about gaming markets.
- The bill defines gaming as any live, simulated, or virtual physical or mental challenge or game of chance. It also clarifies the ban does not cover ordinary contracts that are based on a commodity's price, rate, value, or level.
*It would block event contracts tied to unlawful or sensitive activities while preserving a State option to exempt gaming.*
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.
Ban on event-based trading contracts
This bill would ban listing or offering for trading certain contracts in excluded commodities when they are tied to events. Covered events would include unlawful activity, terrorism, assassination, war, gaming, election results, or government conduct. Gaming would mean any live, simulated, or virtual physical or mental challenge or game of chance. A State law could expressly exempt conduct in that State from the gaming ban. The ban would exclude contracts based only on price, rate, value, or level of certain commodities. It would take effect 180 days after enactment, and the CFTC could add other activities by rule.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1]
UT • R
Cosponsors
Rep. Amodei, Mark E. [R-NV-2]
NV • R
Sponsored 10/22/2026
Rep. Horsford, Steven [D-NV-4]
NV • D
Sponsored 10/22/2026
Rep. Ruiz, Raul [D-CA-25]
CA • D
Sponsored 10/22/2026
Rep. Levin, Mike [D-CA-49]
CA • D
Sponsored 10/22/2026
Rep. Carbajal, Salud O. [D-CA-24]
CA • D
Sponsored 3/5/2026
Rep. Vasquez, Gabe [D-NM-2]
NM • D
Sponsored 4/21/2026
Rep. Arrington, Jodey C. [R-TX-19]
TX • R
Sponsored 5/26/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.gov