HRES1011119th Congress

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the structure and governance of the Football Bowl Subdivision postseason should prioritize broad-based athletic opportunity, financial sustainability for college athletics, and competitive balance, and that innovative proposals to expand broad based postseason participation-such as proposals advanced by Coach Mike Leach-warrant serious consideration to mitigate anticompetitive effects in top-division college football.

Sponsored By: Representative Baumgartner, Michael [R-WA-5]

Introduced

Summary

Broader, bracketed postseason formats for FBS would expand competitive opportunity and rebalance financial rewards. The resolution would urge serious consideration of proposals like Coach Mike Leach’s 16-, 32-, or 64-team bracket paired with shorter seasons and unified media packaging.

Show full summary
  • Student-athletes and teams: More teams would get a meaningful late-season path instead of a narrow gate. FBS fields about 136 programs while the College Football Playoff currently selects a 12-team field.
  • Colleges and conferences: It would push scrutiny of postseason revenue splits that favor a few conferences. Public reporting shows the SEC and Big Ten each receive about 29% of CFP base distributions while the Group of Five collectively receive about 9%.
  • Program finances: The resolution highlights sustainability stress for many programs. The median FBS program showed about a $19.3 million operating deficit in 2022 and about 70% of public FBS colleges lost money on bowl games from 2015–2018.
  • Media and national product: Advocates argue unified packaging and a broader bracket could unlock roughly $4–$7 billion in additional distributable value to strengthen competitive balance.

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Bill Overview

No Economic Impacts Identified for this Bill

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

Baumgartner, Michael [R-WA-5]

WA • R

Cosponsors

There are no cosponsors for this bill.

Roll Call Votes

No roll call votes available for this bill.

View on Congress.gov
Back to Legislation