WisconsinAB4532025-2026 Wisconsin Legislature (Biennial Session)HouseWALLET

An Act to repeal 66.1001 (1) (am) and 66.1001 (3m); to renumber and amend 66.1001 (2) (h), 66.1001 (3), 66.10016 (3) and 66.10016 (4); to amend 59.69 (3) (a), 62.23 (3) (b), 66.1001 (2m) (title), 66.1001 (2m) (a), 66.1002 (2) (intro.), 66.1105 (6) (g) 1. (intro.) and 66.1105 (6) (g) 3.; to repeal and recreate 66.1001 (3) (title); to create 66.1001 (2) (h) 4., 66.1001 (3) (b), 66.1001 (3) (c), 66.10016 (3) (b), 66.10016 (4) (b), 66.10016 (5) and 66.1105 (2) (cs) of the statutes; Relating to: required approvals of rezoning requests related to residential development, contents of and consistency of local ordinances with local comprehensive plans, certain tax incremental district project costs related to residential development, and tax incremental district lifespan extension. (FE)

Sponsored By: David Armstrong (Republican), Robert Brooks (Republican), Barbara Dittrich (Republican), Daniel Knodl (Republican), Rob Kreibich (Republican), David Murphy (Republican), Jerry O'Connor (Republican), William Penterman (Republican), Jim Piwowarczyk (Republican), Rob Summerfield (Republican)

Became Law

AdministrationDepartment of -- Agency and general functionsCountyFarmland preservationHousingLand use planning and controlMunicipality -- PlanningOrdinanceProperty taxTown

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

3 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 0 costs, 3 mixed.

Faster housing permits and 60-day rezoning

If you file a complete permit application for a housing project that meets all rules in place that day, the local government must grant it. The filing date is the day they receive it. For needed rezoning, if the site is shown for housing in the plan, is near existing development and can be served, fits the plan’s current 5-year density range, and the plan shows a housing shortfall within five years, the government must approve within 60 days. You must certify the land is not in a farmland preservation zoning district, not in an agricultural enterprise area, and not under a farmland preservation agreement. A false certification makes you pay the costs to undo or fix any rezoning, and you cannot recover those costs. You may state preferences for zoning class, setbacks, lot width or frontage, and lot size.

Stronger local plans with housing densities

Counties and cities that take listed land-use actions must use full, modern comprehensive plan elements. Plans must list existing land uses and net density, study land supply, demand, and prices, add 20-year projections in 5-year steps, and map current and future uses and service areas. Net density excludes wetlands, 100-year floodplains, and government-owned lands not meant for redevelopment. Plans, except for towns and counties, must also map future housing areas and set the minimum and maximum homes per acre for each 5-year period across 20 years. This adds work for local governments but gives residents and builders clearer, measurable targets for housing and growth.

Zoning must match the adopted plan

When a local government passes or changes certain land-use ordinances, they must be consistent with the adopted land-use map and its category descriptions. Only the map and those descriptions count, and an ordinance can still be consistent even if it allows extra uses beyond the map. These consistency definitions do not apply to towns or counties. For residential areas, governments other than towns and counties must put the plan’s minimum and maximum net housing densities into their ordinances, and when adding land by annexation or consolidation for housing, they must do the same and fix any missing plan material within 180 days after a related application. Adopting a plan by ordinance does not itself make the plan a regulation. The law also repeals a prior subsection to align timing and consistency rules.

Sponsors & Cosponsors

Sponsors

  • David Armstrong

    Republican • House

  • Robert Brooks

    Republican • House

  • Barbara Dittrich

    Republican • House

  • Daniel Knodl

    Republican • House

  • Rob Kreibich

    Republican • House

  • David Murphy

    Republican • House

  • Jerry O'Connor

    Republican • House

  • William Penterman

    Republican • House

  • Jim Piwowarczyk

    Republican • House

  • Rob Summerfield

    Republican • House

Cosponsors

  • Jodi Emerson

    Democratic • House

  • John Jagler

    Republican • Senate

  • Melissa Ratcliff

    Democratic • Senate

Roll Call Votes

All Roll Calls

Yes: 155 • No: 100

Senate vote 2/18/2026

Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15

Yes: 18 • No: 15

Senate vote 2/18/2026

Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 28, Noes 5

Yes: 28 • No: 5

House vote 10/7/2025

Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 54, Noes 41

Yes: 54 • No: 41

House vote 10/7/2025

Read a third time and passed, Ayes 55, Noes 39

Yes: 55 • No: 39

Actions Timeline

  1. Published 4-3-2026

    4/2/2026House
  2. Report approved by the Governor on 4-2-2026. 2025 Wisconsin Act 173

    4/2/2026House
  3. Presented to the Governor on 4-1-2026

    4/1/2026House
  4. Representative Emerson added as a coauthor

    3/19/2026House
  5. Report correctly enrolled on 2-23-2026

    2/23/2026House
  6. LRB correction (Senate Substitute Amendment 1)

    2/23/2026House
  7. Action ordered immediately messaged

    2/19/2026House
  8. Senate Substitute Amendment 1 concurred in

    2/19/2026House
  9. Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 concurred in

    2/19/2026House
  10. Received from Senate amended and concurred in as amended (Senate amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 and Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted)

    2/18/2026House
  11. Ordered immediately messaged

    2/18/2026Senate
  12. Senator Ratcliff added as a cosponsor

    2/18/2026Senate
  13. Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 28, Noes 5

    2/18/2026Senate
  14. Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

    2/18/2026Senate
  15. Ordered to a third reading

    2/18/2026Senate
  16. Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

    2/18/2026Senate
  17. Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15

    2/18/2026Senate
  18. Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

    2/18/2026Senate
  19. Read a second time

    2/18/2026Senate
  20. Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senators Ratcliff, L. Johnson, Wall, Spreitzer, Drake, Dassler-Alfheim, Habush Sinykin, Hesselbein, Keyeski, Pfaff, Roys and Smith

    2/18/2026Senate
  21. Placed on calendar 2-18-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

    2/17/2026Senate
  22. Available for scheduling

    11/11/2025Senate
  23. Report concurrence as amended recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0

    11/11/2025Senate
  24. Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0

    11/11/2025Senate
  25. Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0

    11/11/2025Senate

Bill Text

Related Bills

Back to State Legislation