WisconsinAB4532025-2026 Wisconsin Legislature (Biennial Session)House

An Act to repeal 66.1001 (1) (am) and 66.1001 (3m); to renumber and amend 66.1001 (2) (h), 66.1001 (3), 66.10016 (3) and 66.10016 (4); to amend 59.69 (3) (a), 62.23 (3) (b), 66.1001 (2m) (title), 66.1001 (2m) (a), 66.1002 (2) (intro.), 66.1105 (6) (g) 1. (intro.) and 66.1105 (6) (g) 3.; to repeal and recreate 66.1001 (3) (title); to create 66.1001 (2) (h) 4., 66.1001 (3) (b), 66.1001 (3) (c), 66.10016 (3) (b), 66.10016 (4) (b), 66.10016 (5) and 66.1105 (2) (cs) of the statutes; Relating to: required approvals of rezoning requests related to residential development, contents of and consistency of local ordinances with local comprehensive plans, certain tax incremental district project costs related to residential development, and tax incremental district lifespan extension. (FE)

Sponsored By: David Armstrong (Republican), Robert Brooks (Republican), Barbara Dittrich (Republican), Daniel Knodl (Republican), Rob Kreibich (Republican), David Murphy (Republican), Jerry O'Connor (Republican), William Penterman (Republican), Jim Piwowarczyk (Republican), Rob Summerfield (Republican)

Signed by Governor

AdministrationDepartment of -- Agency and general functionsCountyFarmland preservationHousingLand use planning and controlMunicipality -- PlanningOrdinanceProperty taxTown

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

3 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 1 costs, 1 mixed.

Housing developers gain faster rezoning and remedies

Beginning January 1, 2028, covered Wisconsin local governments must grant qualifying residential rezoning requests within 60 days. Requests must state minimum and maximum homes per acre and address unmet housing demand now or within five years. Land must be planned for housing, near existing development, and reasonably served by existing infrastructure and public services. Density must match the plan's current five-year range. Exceptions to the planned-use and density tests apply when required density details remain missing after the required plan update. Qualifying projects must reasonably expect public sewer and water service, with no reasonable belief of environmental contamination. Applicants must certify that the land has none of the listed farmland protections. Towns, counties, protected farmland, and land within city or village extraterritorial zoning areas are excluded. Governments may deny requests to prevent public-facility shortages or overloads, or significant health or safety threats. A housing-proposal solicitation receiving no qualifying responses can suspend the expedited pathway for one year after its response deadline. Applicants can ask a court to order approval of qualifying permits or rezoning requests improperly left unapproved. For missed rezoning deadlines, applicants may also recover court costs and reasonable attorney fees caused by the delay.

Local housing plans get clearer density rules

Beginning January 1, 2028, covered Wisconsin local governments must plan residential areas in five-year steps over 20 years. Plans must set minimum and maximum homes per acre for each area and period. When adopting or changing covered ordinances, or adding residential land through annexation or consolidation, governments must include these standards in plans and ordinances. If required plan details are missing when a residential permit or rezoning request arrives, governments have 180 days to amend the plan. Only the adopted land-use map and its category descriptions control whether an ordinance matches the plan. An ordinance that allows a mapped use can also allow extra uses without that alone making it inconsistent. Towns and counties are exempt from these requirements.

Housing applicants must certify farmland protections

Beginning January 1, 2028, residential-development permit applicants must certify that their land has none of three farmland protections. These are a farmland preservation zoning district, a farmland preservation agreement, or an agricultural enterprise area. Applicants who falsely certify must pay the local government's costs to reverse or remedy the rezoning. They also lose access to the specified cost-recovery remedies. The law sets no fixed dollar amount.

Sponsors & Cosponsors

Sponsors

  • David Armstrong

    Republican • House

  • Robert Brooks

    Republican • House

  • Barbara Dittrich

    Republican • House

  • Daniel Knodl

    Republican • House

  • Rob Kreibich

    Republican • House

  • David Murphy

    Republican • House

  • Jerry O'Connor

    Republican • House

  • William Penterman

    Republican • House

  • Jim Piwowarczyk

    Republican • House

  • Rob Summerfield

    Republican • House

Cosponsors

  • Jodi Emerson

    Democratic • House

  • John Jagler

    Republican • Senate

  • Melissa Ratcliff

    Democratic • Senate

Roll Call Votes

All Roll Calls

Yes: 155 • No: 100

Senate vote • 2/18/2026

Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15

Yes: 18 • No: 15

Senate vote • 2/18/2026

Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 28, Noes 5

Yes: 28 • No: 5

House vote • 10/7/2025

Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 54, Noes 41

Yes: 54 • No: 41

House vote • 10/7/2025

Read a third time and passed, Ayes 55, Noes 39

Yes: 55 • No: 39

Actions Timeline

  1. Published 4-3-2026

    4/2/2026House
  2. Report approved by the Governor on 4-2-2026. 2025 Wisconsin Act 173

    4/2/2026House
  3. Presented to the Governor on 4-1-2026

    4/1/2026House
  4. Representative Emerson added as a coauthor

    3/19/2026House
  5. Report correctly enrolled on 2-23-2026

    2/23/2026House
  6. LRB correction (Senate Substitute Amendment 1)

    2/23/2026House
  7. Action ordered immediately messaged

    2/19/2026House
  8. Senate Substitute Amendment 1 concurred in

    2/19/2026House
  9. Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 concurred in

    2/19/2026House
  10. Received from Senate amended and concurred in as amended (Senate amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 and Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted)

    2/18/2026House
  11. Ordered immediately messaged

    2/18/2026Senate
  12. Senator Ratcliff added as a cosponsor

    2/18/2026Senate
  13. Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 28, Noes 5

    2/18/2026Senate
  14. Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

    2/18/2026Senate
  15. Ordered to a third reading

    2/18/2026Senate
  16. Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

    2/18/2026Senate
  17. Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15

    2/18/2026Senate
  18. Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

    2/18/2026Senate
  19. Read a second time

    2/18/2026Senate
  20. Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senators Ratcliff, L. Johnson, Wall, Spreitzer, Drake, Dassler-Alfheim, Habush Sinykin, Hesselbein, Keyeski, Pfaff, Roys and Smith

    2/18/2026Senate
  21. Placed on calendar 2-18-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

    2/17/2026Senate
  22. Available for scheduling

    11/11/2025Senate
  23. Report concurrence as amended recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0

    11/11/2025Senate
  24. Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0

    11/11/2025Senate
  25. Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0

    11/11/2025Senate

Bill Text

Related Bills

Back to State Legislation