WisconsinAB5302025-2026 Wisconsin Legislature (Biennial Session)House

An Act to renumber and amend 114.045 (1) and 114.045 (3); to amend 114.045 (2); to create 114.045 (1b), 114.045 (1m) (b) and 114.045 (3) (b) of the statutes; Relating to: the operation of drones over school property and providing a penalty.

Sponsored By: Elijah Behnke (Republican), Barbara Dittrich (Republican), Benjamin Franklin (Republican), Russell Goodwin (Democratic), Rick Gundrum (Republican), Joel Kitchens (Republican), Daniel Knodl (Republican), Paul Melotik (Republican), David Murphy (Republican), Jeffrey Mursau (Republican), Jerry O'Connor (Republican), William Penterman (Republican), Jim Piwowarczyk (Republican), Joe Sheehan (Democratic), Christine Sinicki (Democratic), David Steffen (Republican), Angela Stroud (Democratic), Chuck Wichgers (Republican)

Signed by Governor

AviationForfeitureIndians and tribal issuesParochial and private schoolsPoliceSchool -- AdministrationSchool -- BuildingSheriff

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

1 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 1 costs, 0 mixed.

Drone pilots face school and prison limits

Wisconsin law bans drone flights over school-owned property or property where a school is located. This covers public elementary and high schools, including charter schools, plus private and tribal schools. The school’s governing board or body, or its designee, can expressly authorize flights. A public safety agency chief with authority in the area can also direct flights for specific purposes. These include active search and rescue, finding an escaped prisoner, or watching a location to carry out an arrest warrant. Flights to prevent imminent danger to someone or imminent destruction of evidence also require an officer’s reasonable suspicion that drone use is necessary. Eligible agencies include law enforcement, tribal law enforcement, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Flights over correctional institutions, including their grounds, require express permission from the corrections secretary, county sheriff, or their designee, as applicable. Violating either ban can lead to a forfeiture of up to $5,000. Officers investigating an alleged violation must seize drone-created images, recordings, and data representing visual images from that flight. School-related material goes to, or stays with, the local law enforcement agency with jurisdiction. Correctional-facility material goes to the Department of Corrections or the authority in charge of the facility.

Sponsors & Cosponsors

Sponsors

  • Elijah Behnke

    Republican • House

  • Barbara Dittrich

    Republican • House

  • Benjamin Franklin

    Republican • House

  • Russell Goodwin

    Democratic • House

  • Rick Gundrum

    Republican • House

  • Joel Kitchens

    Republican • House

  • Daniel Knodl

    Republican • House

  • Paul Melotik

    Republican • House

  • David Murphy

    Republican • House

  • Jeffrey Mursau

    Republican • House

  • Jerry O'Connor

    Republican • House

  • William Penterman

    Republican • House

  • Jim Piwowarczyk

    Republican • House

  • Joe Sheehan

    Democratic • House

  • Christine Sinicki

    Democratic • House

  • David Steffen

    Republican • House

  • Angela Stroud

    Democratic • House

  • Chuck Wichgers

    Republican • House

Cosponsors

  • Jenna Jacobson

    Democratic • House

  • Jesse James

    Republican • Senate

  • Howard Marklein

    Republican • Senate

  • Sylvia Ortiz-Velez

    Democratic • House

  • Jeff Smith

    Democratic • Senate

  • Shelia Stubbs

    Democratic • House

  • Cory Tomczyk

    Republican • Senate

Roll Call Votes

No roll call votes available for this bill.

Bill Text

Related Bills

Back to State Legislation